X beat Y who beat Z, so X is best
#151
Posted 18 August 2011 - 15:43
Edit; here you go - page 2
Advertisement
#152
Posted 18 August 2011 - 15:45
I wonder if we can make Piquet jnr > Piquet snr ?
Edited by Tsarwash, 18 August 2011 - 15:46.
#153
Posted 18 August 2011 - 15:53
That's where it ends. Nice try I guess
EDIT: If we count Spec
Yeah a nice failed try
Edited by Wheels23, 18 August 2011 - 16:02.
#154
Posted 18 August 2011 - 15:58
Damn. You beat me to it.
But Ive got another one too...
RS > Button > Villeneuve > Frentzen > Wendlinger > MS
The best is indeed Dani Sordo >Raikkonen>montoya>Ralf.....
#155
Posted 18 August 2011 - 16:07
Ok gentleman new challenge...................I tried but failed
Danica Patrick>Takuma Sato> ending with Hamilton/Schumacher would be perfect.
Here you go... Proof that Danica Patrick is better than Schumi, Hamilton, Alonso, Button and Vettel!!!
Patrick > Sato > Courtney > van der Merwe > Piquet jnr > Di Grassi > Di Resta > Vettel > Webber > Rosberg > M.Schumacher
Patrick > Sato > Courtney > van der Merwe > Piquet jnr > Di Grassi > Di Resta > Vettel > Webber > Rosberg > Hamilton
Patrick > Sato > Courtney > van der Merwe > Piquet jnr > Di Grassi > Di Resta > Vettel > Webber > Rosberg > Hamilton > Alonso
Patrick > Sato > Courtney > van der Merwe > Piquet jnr > Di Grassi > Di Resta > Vettel > Webber > Rosberg > Hamilton > Button
Patrick > Sato > Courtney > van der Merwe > Piquet jnr > Di Grassi > Di Resta > Vettel
Danica Patrick...
Where are you???
F1 needs you... and your talent...
Edited by gillesthegenius, 18 August 2011 - 16:20.
#156
Posted 18 August 2011 - 16:13
But I did it first
Oh!!! You did too...
This is becoming hillarious... Awesome stuff!!!
#157
Posted 18 August 2011 - 16:40
Even though I first used this system to show Irvine > Schumacher, this does break the second rule of the game. However a quick glance at wiki suggests that Piquet snr > Schumacher.
I wonder if we can make Piquet jnr > Piquet snr ?
Piquet Jr. > Petrov > Hulkenberg > Kamui Kobayashi > Heidfeld > Massa > Villeneuve > Frentzen > Hill > Senna (Williams when they were racing together) > Prost > Mansell > Piquet Srn.
I tried.
EDIT: New change
Edited by Wheels23, 18 August 2011 - 16:53.
#158
Posted 18 August 2011 - 16:49
Here you go... Proof that Danica Patrick is better than Schumi, Hamilton, Alonso, Button and Vettel!!!
Patrick > Sato > Courtney > van der Merwe > Piquet jnr > Di Grassi > Di Resta > Vettel > Webber > Rosberg > M.Schumacher
Patrick > Sato > Courtney > van der Merwe > Piquet jnr > Di Grassi > Di Resta > Vettel > Webber > Rosberg > Hamilton
Patrick > Sato > Courtney > van der Merwe > Piquet jnr > Di Grassi > Di Resta > Vettel > Webber > Rosberg > Hamilton > Alonso
Patrick > Sato > Courtney > van der Merwe > Piquet jnr > Di Grassi > Di Resta > Vettel > Webber > Rosberg > Hamilton > Button
Patrick > Sato > Courtney > van der Merwe > Piquet jnr > Di Grassi > Di Resta > Vettel
Danica Patrick...
Where are you???
F1 needs you... and your talent...
You are a genius! /thread
or not this is too much fun.
#159
Posted 18 August 2011 - 17:30
that's why we have rule #2
There must be some other way to show why Barrichello is better than Schumacher....
Barichello > The Stig = Schumacher
Advertisement
#160
Posted 18 August 2011 - 17:38
dang!Barichello > The Stig = Schumacher
Buttoneer, do TopGear track times count? that could add a few options.
#161
Posted 18 August 2011 - 17:43
that's why we have rule #2
There must be some other way to show why Barrichello is better than Schumacher....
Rubens Barrichello > Eddie Irvine > Heinz-Harald Frentzen > Andrea de Cesaris > Michael Schumacher
(Irvine beat Frentzen when they were driving for Jordan in F3000)
#162
Posted 18 August 2011 - 19:12
This is surrealRubens Barrichello > Eddie Irvine > Heinz-Harald Frentzen > Andrea de Cesaris > Michael Schumacher
#163
Posted 18 August 2011 - 19:29
I think there's a post on page 1 where RS is to the left of MS, but the significance wasn't spotted at the time.
Edit; here you go - page 2
I must point out a mistake in my post there. The 1st time Ralf appears is wrong, because Fisi beat him, and I had it the other way round.
#164
Posted 18 August 2011 - 19:38
TBH, I think it makes it too easy. Part of the fun is the difficulty (IMHO) which would be taken away by some pretty random results.dang!
Buttoneer, do TopGear track times count? that could add a few options.
I do have another challenge though which is; can you get a driver who is currently losing to their teammate, ahead? So, can we get Massa ahead of Alonso or Button ahead of Hamilton etc etc?
#165
Posted 18 August 2011 - 19:53
oh, okay.TBH, I think it makes it too easy. Part of the fun is the difficulty (IMHO) which would be taken away by some pretty random results.
I do have another challenge though which is; can you get a driver who is currently losing to their teammate, ahead? So, can we get Massa ahead of Alonso or Button ahead of Hamilton etc etc?
Massa > Raikkönen > Coulthard > Webber (2007) > Rosberg > Hamilton > Alonso
yeah, it's a bit fishy at the Coulthard-Webber part, but whatever...
Button > Trulli > Glock > di Grassi > di Resta > Vettel > Webber > Rosberg > Hamilton
#166
Posted 18 August 2011 - 20:48
#167
Posted 18 August 2011 - 22:40
TBH, I think it makes it too easy. Part of the fun is the difficulty (IMHO) which would be taken away by some pretty random results.
I do have another challenge though which is; can you get a driver who is currently losing to their teammate, ahead? So, can we get Massa ahead of Alonso or Button ahead of Hamilton etc etc?
Ok. This is not a current teammate pairing.
But I thought this could put a smile on the face of a tortured soul, if he ever happens to read this thread...
Piquet jnr > di Grassi > di Resta > Vettel > Webber > Rosberg > Hamilton > Alonso
#168
Posted 18 August 2011 - 23:38
#169
Posted 18 August 2011 - 23:57
These ones really strike home with the full force of the bullshit.
Absolutely.
But this is too much fun. Not had as much fun from the time I joined this forum. Awesome thread buttoneer.
Good to have an RC host like you.
#170
Posted 19 August 2011 - 01:02
You officially deserve the as stated in the rules of the thread by Buttoneer.
I didnt read the rules in which case its just silly and i wont be posting again
Sorry mate but its the rules.
#171
Posted 19 August 2011 - 01:05
I didnt read the rules in which case its just silly and i wont be posting again
#172
Posted 19 August 2011 - 05:05
#173
Posted 19 August 2011 - 05:51
#174
Posted 19 August 2011 - 07:14
Marques > Alonso > Massa > Raikkonen > Montoya > R.Schumacher > Button > Trulli > Glock > Di Grassi > Di Resta > Vettel > Webber > Rosberg > Hamilton
What the hell is Marquez doing wasting all his talent?
Better than all 5 world champions of this generation and not to be seen in f1 at all.
Does he think he is too good for f1?
Finally the riddle is solved.
Perhaps one could write
Rosberg>[Hamilton, M.Schumacher]
#175
Posted 19 August 2011 - 08:28
Is Bernie > Senna possible at all?
I don't think Bernie ever beat a team mate. By the time he was part of a team, it was his team and he only dabbled anyway. It would be like Tony Fernandes entering a Lotus for a bit of fun. Bernie was always the slowest Connaught.
#176
Posted 19 August 2011 - 09:15
#177
Posted 19 August 2011 - 10:04
Kovalainen > Trulli > Alonso = Hamilton
#178
Posted 19 August 2011 - 11:02
I didnt read the rules in which case its just silly and i wont be posting again
Bold bit = bullshit too far for this thread, I'm afraid.Former team-mate pairings?
Kovalainen > Trulli > Alonso = Hamilton
Either Hamilton > Alonso per FIA standings or Alonso> Hamilton per races finished ahead. If you use the latter measurement, then you have to do the same with Kovi & Trulli.
The bullshit needs to be consistently applied, even if it is with a shovel rather than a 000 fine art brush.
#179
Posted 19 August 2011 - 12:51
#181
Posted 19 August 2011 - 13:16
I was hoping for a better end but thanks,I guess he was BADoer.Montermini
#182
Posted 19 August 2011 - 13:19
Arf!The bullshit needs to be consistently applied, even if it is with a shovel rather than a 000 fine art brush.
#183
Posted 19 August 2011 - 14:01
I was hoping for a better end but thanks,I guess he was BADoer.
He beat Barrichello, Coulthard, Panis, McNish et al to the 1992 F3000 title.
#184
Posted 19 August 2011 - 14:03
then:He beat Barrichello, Coulthard, Panis, McNish et al to the 1992 F3000 title.
Badoer > Coulthard > Raikkönen (2002) > Badoer
#185
Posted 19 August 2011 - 14:05
Rubens Barrichello > Eddie Irvine > Heinz-Harald Frentzen > Andrea de Cesaris > Michael Schumacher
(Irvine beat Frentzen when they were driving for Jordan in F3000)
Wasn't HHF supposed to be better than Schumacher anyway?
#186
Posted 19 August 2011 - 15:08
Wasn't HHF supposed to be better than Schumacher anyway?
Pretty much.
#187
Posted 19 August 2011 - 15:18
He beat Barrichello, Coulthard, Panis, McNish et al to the 1992 F3000 title.
good work
Badoer>Barichello>Button>Trulli >Glock>Di Grassi>Di Resta>Vettel>Webber>Rosberg>Schumacher
#188
Posted 19 August 2011 - 15:55
good work
Badoer>Barichello>Button>Trulli >Glock>Di Grassi>Di Resta>Vettel>Webber>Rosberg>Schumacher
But how about this one?
Badoer > Barrichello > Irvine > Frentzen > Hill > Senna
#189
Posted 19 August 2011 - 16:01
But how about this one?
Badoer > Barrichello > Irvine > Frentzen > Hill > Senna
This thread should be stickied,so next time someone tries to use the X Y Z formula he can have some humble pie here.
#190
Posted 19 August 2011 - 16:11
This thread should be stickied,so next time someone tries to use the X Y Z formula he can have some humble pie here.
Absolutely.
#191
Posted 19 August 2011 - 16:28
Excellent. I think this one drives the point home better than all the other ones so far.
But how about this one?
Badoer > Barrichello > Irvine > Frentzen > Hill > Senna
#192
Posted 19 August 2011 - 16:38
How can people say Barrichello>Button? According to the rules the entire periode they were teammates has to be considered.
good work
Badoer>Barichello>Button>Trulli >Glock>Di Grassi>Di Resta>Vettel>Webber>Rosberg>Schumacher
Edited by Augurk, 19 August 2011 - 16:38.
#193
Posted 19 August 2011 - 16:58
Captain Teague's voice; The code is the Law!How can people say Barrichello>Button? According to the rules the entire periode they were teammates has to be considered.
1. A driver 'X' beats driver 'Y' in the same team, this is an absolute statement of their ability.
#194
Posted 19 August 2011 - 17:01
Captain Teague's voice; The code is the Law!
1. A driver 'X' beats driver 'Y' in the same team, this is an absolute statement of their ability.
And
2. If the drivers were teammates over a number of years, we will consider the total period.
Come on we can still get him beating Button, but you'll have to put more effort in
#195
Posted 19 August 2011 - 17:03
Buttoneer (the keeper of the code) needs to clarify Rule 1&2.And
2. If the drivers were teammates over a number of years, we will consider the total period.
Come on we can still get him beating Button, but you'll have to put more effort in ;)
Edited by fieraku, 19 August 2011 - 17:14.
#196
Posted 19 August 2011 - 18:59
Buttoneer (the keeper of the code) needs to clarify Rule 1&2.
If it weren't for rule #2 then it would be too easy. Basically rule #2 is an extension to rule #1. Of course in the event they were tied on points you can look at the official standing... or better yet, invoke rule #8
So if it weren't for rule #2 we could have Button>Barichello>Button... which wouldn't be fun at all
#197
Posted 19 August 2011 - 20:03
He beat Barrichello, Coulthard, Panis, McNish et al to the 1992 F3000 title.
And also Alboreto in 1993, which opens up some intriguing historical possibilities.
#198
Posted 19 August 2011 - 21:46
The rules don't need clarifying. The first says that one driver must beat the other, and the second provides the conditions under which that rule operates. On that basis, Barrichello doesn't beat Button. Might be possible to do a count to see whether Barrichello finished in front more often (rule 8), but then you need to apply that across your entire chain to be consistent.Buttoneer (the keeper of the code) needs to clarify Rule 1&2.
#199
Posted 21 August 2011 - 17:21
Massa > Raikkonen > Montoya > R. Schumacher > Trulli > Katayama > Marques > Alonso
gogogo Massa
Advertisement
#200
Posted 21 August 2011 - 19:08
Is Bernie > Senna possible at all?
Bernie was better team boss than Prost.