My drawing was of the F300.
My apologies - I obviously have a typo in my file name.
Peter
Posted 02 July 2012 - 05:59
My drawing was of the F300.
Advertisement
Posted 02 July 2012 - 11:49
SORRY... are you doubting me??!! i told you... the first is the f1-2000 and the second the f399! pick some real pictures of both and see the color of the front wing... 1999 f399 is black! i dont know why or how,but the magazine changed the names.
Posted 03 July 2012 - 16:51
Posted 04 July 2012 - 19:22
Posted 04 July 2012 - 19:49
Posted 05 July 2012 - 16:04
Edited by Motocar, 05 July 2012 - 16:21.
Posted 05 July 2012 - 16:29
Edited by werks prototype, 10 July 2012 - 18:24.
Posted 05 July 2012 - 16:47
Posted 07 July 2012 - 01:08
I love these Ibsen. I saw these Jufuku images on a Japanese web site and I am very glad that you posted them in a suitable size. Do you have his Lancia Stratos?
Posted 07 July 2012 - 16:43
Posted 08 July 2012 - 17:03
Posted 09 July 2012 - 19:52
Posted 10 July 2012 - 18:24
Posted 11 July 2012 - 03:17
Edited by Motocar, 11 July 2012 - 03:18.
Posted 11 July 2012 - 13:52
Hi mate, could you please upload this wonderful image trying to avoid the moire patterns please??
Thanks in advance!!!
Posted 11 July 2012 - 15:29
Edited by TopGun, 11 July 2012 - 15:36.
Posted 11 July 2012 - 16:30
It's not aliasing... moire patterns is when you see the little points at full dimension... This happens when you make a scan from a magazine without filtering the image...
Posted 11 July 2012 - 17:06
Hi mate, could you please upload this wonderful image trying to avoid the moire patterns please??
Thanks in advance!!!
Posted 11 July 2012 - 18:41
Hi mate, could you please upload this wonderful image trying to avoid the moire patterns please??
Thanks in advance!!!
Edited by Karabas, 11 July 2012 - 18:48.
Posted 12 July 2012 - 16:57
I am not sure what you would like me to do - on my monitor I see no problems with my original or the download from ImageShack, whether viewed as a reduced image or full sized. Below is a thumbnail of the image uploaded in smaller scale - that often corrects issues. My original is digital - I did not do the scan.
Peter
Edited by TWest, 12 July 2012 - 17:05.
Advertisement
Posted 12 July 2012 - 17:03
Good enough for me!Does that sum it up for everyone?
Posted 12 July 2012 - 17:15
Good enough for me!
Posted 12 July 2012 - 17:37
<re: Tony Matthews>
Thanks for your amazing contributions to this whole process. Just looked up the "new guy" with 8 posts, and happened to see yours with 16000 posts. Busy boy over there for someone who has been "out of the game" for a while. I love it, as you really were my hero for many years, and right after you first started getting published with the b&w work.
Any of you guys who don't appreciate the quality of work done by our Mr. Matthews don't quite get it here ... don't think there are many of those around ...
Tom West
Posted 12 July 2012 - 21:57
Looks like my avatar sitting in one of the chairs
Posted 12 July 2012 - 23:06
Peter,
I am not quite sure what the problem is here. I have taken this scan up to 100% and am getting nothing funny out of it. Your scans are about as good as anything I have seen on the site, and the stitching and cleanup are pretty spectacular, so I am not quite sure what is expected here.
We are all scanning from magazines and old screened prints, so you get what you get. I am not sure how many I have done, but I have never used any of the screening filters as I tried a couple of things and was not happy with the result. Seemed like it took out small details on occasion, and the overall result it generally better going fairly large to begin, and I bring it down in size to post here (generally something in the 40-50% range is the repro percentage for the file). I am not sure where the expectation comes for print-ready artwork here, but I have been more than happy with the contributions, and appreciate everyone's efforts. If you truly need something better, approach the magazines or whoever and try to buy the artwork.
This is, as we have stated in the past, done for the pure academic analysis by knowledgeable and appreciative students of the art form, and is not intended to have any commercial use in any form of reproduction whatsoever. If you are looking for completely printable originals, you should go back to the source, which is going to be fairly tough for 40 or 60 year old publications, I should think. If you are looking to print it out, as I had thought at one point, you are looking at a very long process here, as there are still drawing flowing in, and there are an amazing number that have come through in the past. I will always try to clean things up with a little lightning in the shadows and a few other things, just for my personal preferences. But, the material is pretty respectable in most cases. Much appreciated here, everyone.
Does that sum it up for everyone?
Thanks.
Tom West
Posted 13 July 2012 - 17:12
It looks like a simple request caused some problems here... I'm not searching any drawing to print (or sell), and didn't say anything against simplebrother and his post.
Karabas has focused the small issue I was referring to, which is quite annoying to see on the monitor at full resolution, and i kindly asked for any possibility to avoid it... maybe someone misunderstood my words!
BTW after all I had finally the possibility to download the image and to photoshop it a bit to remove the disturb... if anyone likes here is it, naturally all credits are for simplebrother!
Cheers and peace for all!!!
Posted 14 July 2012 - 05:27
Posted 14 July 2012 - 10:41
Honda NR750, the "four cylinder", oval-piston endurance racer of 1987. This image is from the August 1987 issue of Cycle World. It carries no attribution, but may have been supplied by the Honda Racing Corporation. The cylinder configuration, quite apparent in the cutaway, does not not quite fit the definition of "oval". Rather it is more like a V8 with the circular sections of adjacent cylinders connected by straight line segments, with each cylinder having dual titanium connecting rods. It was claimed to be producing 155 horsepower from 750 cc's around 14,000 rpm. Valves were spring controlled, but, with eight per cylinder, were tiny.
The Honda NR 500 cc V-4 racing engine, oval piston, published in Popular Mechanic 02/1981, author Jeff Mangiat
Detail Piston, spark plug, and valves, author unknow
Honda NR 750 cc engine photo
Posted 14 July 2012 - 21:11
Posted 15 July 2012 - 14:22
Posted 15 July 2012 - 20:51
Yep, I think you are probably right there. (If not, then perhaps Franco Rosso) Who incidentally, it turns out, is responsible for the Fiat Campagnola on the previous page. As well as this version of the CampagnolaIt's surely a Betti's!!!
Edited by werks prototype, 15 July 2012 - 21:16.
Posted 16 July 2012 - 01:23
Edited by Motocar, 23 July 2012 - 12:14.
Advertisement
Posted 16 July 2012 - 10:48
More 'developmental' variations of the Lancia, below. (If they are correctly in sequence, then it is a thing of pure luck).