Great class. i wish i could play around with cars in that class. Very futuristic looking cars too.
Edited by MatsNorway, 13 January 2012 - 18:43.
Posted 13 January 2012 - 18:42
Edited by MatsNorway, 13 January 2012 - 18:43.
Advertisement
Posted 13 January 2012 - 19:37
http://speedhunters....en-wheeler.aspx
Great class. i wish i could play around with cars in that class. Very futuristic looking cars too.
Posted 13 January 2012 - 21:31
I'm disgusted with this class for what it could have been,
Posted 14 January 2012 - 09:14
in my opinion, F1000 got real expensive about the time Ralph Firman took an interest, and West/Stohr/Speads had to up their game.
Those formula jedi's are just plain ugly in my eyes.
Posted 14 January 2012 - 10:31
Posted 14 January 2012 - 10:36
Posted 14 January 2012 - 10:38
"Cheap" was never the goal with the way the rules were formulated, as I told them at the time.
Posted 14 January 2012 - 11:03
In the f1000 vs F Jedy debate, I still am for F1000, for the very good reason that it is not a spec series.
Edited by NeilR, 14 January 2012 - 12:15.
Posted 14 January 2012 - 11:27
In the f1000 vs F Jedy debate, I still am for F1000, for the very good reason that it is not a spec series.
My first impression, looking at the links above... average cost per "incident"... Jedi $2,000 ... F1000 $20,000
We already discussed Cheapy's rage here...
Edited by cheapracer, 14 January 2012 - 11:34.
Posted 15 January 2012 - 06:59
I don't understand that at all, a poorly attended race with a broad performance differential between cars is better than a 30 field closely run race (both having similar vehicles/spectacle/laptimes)? There is no logic to that.
Posted 15 January 2012 - 15:14
So I guess you prefer to watch GP2 on TV instead of F1?
And, again, you prefer modern 107% limited F1 to the 70's one with its huge performance differentials?
Posted 15 January 2012 - 17:57
My statement was relevant to F1000 Vs Jedi racing.