Craig Scarborough
#1
Posted 01 February 2012 - 19:45
Advertisement
#2
Posted 01 February 2012 - 19:51
...This doesn't mean you'll be taking away Dieter Rencken's column, does it?
Edited by Risil, 01 February 2012 - 20:06.
#3
Posted 01 February 2012 - 20:04
Craig Scarborough
@The_Real_Visu not a job at Autosport, just a few one-off pieces. Massive (free, but donations accepted) blog article coming up
1 hour ago
#4
Posted 02 February 2012 - 05:28
#5
Posted 04 February 2012 - 18:57
#6
Posted 04 February 2012 - 19:00
#7
Posted 04 February 2012 - 19:04
#8
Posted 04 February 2012 - 21:44
Painful to read. I really hope that none of the decision makers at Autosport are able to read that and feel good about what they're publishing.
#9
Posted 07 February 2012 - 21:34
#10
Posted 08 February 2012 - 03:23
#11
Posted 11 February 2012 - 09:14
http://plus.autospor...s-andrew-green/
Painful to read. I really hope that none of the decision makers at Autosport are able to read that and feel good about what they're publishing.
Yep, poor interview. I have yet to read a piece from Gary Anderson that had anything new to those who follow the technical side of F1.
Scarbs has brought multiple technical scoops to Autosport in the past, has better prose and tech writing skills and is more presentable.
#12
Posted 11 February 2012 - 11:33
Autosports only selling point on Gary Anderson, is "former F1 designer" former being the operative word and neither was it out of choice. He simply was not good enough, and hence got cast adrift. Sadly and most predictably the BBC has hired Mr Anderson, on the grounds of "A man with all seeing knowledge" when it comes to F1 design. As a designer Anderson is a failed one and as my mum says "even a broken clock is correct, twice a day" So Anderson's claim to fame is designing a car that has won a couple of gran prix's. That's a whole 2 GP wins in his entire career and neither of them was on merit. The decision makers at Autosport, dropped the ball when the let go Scarbs, in favour of a technical non-entity like Anderson.Yep, poor interview. I have yet to read a piece from Gary Anderson that had anything new to those who follow the technical side of F1.
Scarbs has brought multiple technical scoops to Autosport in the past, has better prose and tech writing skills and is more presentable.
#13
Posted 13 February 2012 - 09:15
#14
Posted 13 February 2012 - 10:27
Ha. That clock quote made think of them tooOrbital rock btw.
#15
Posted 20 February 2012 - 20:43
Bartus(who remembers cheating Catalunya officials with Craig many years ago)
#16
Posted 22 February 2012 - 06:18
Just gonna put this here to see how this one pans out since he didn't, you know, do any journalistic work and is simply speculating.
#17
Posted 24 February 2012 - 00:34
The Ferrari tech analysis from Scarbs. More info on just one page about this car than ive been reading for weeks now on Autosport website. Honestly, why is this guy not getting a full blown contract? It doesnt get any better than this. Autosport GET HIM!!
#18
Posted 24 February 2012 - 08:40
+1. The best guy all around. This would actually make me get a subscription with Autosport, even though I'm already privileged enough to read his technical publication in local magazine in my native language.http://scarbsf1.word...-ferrari-f2012/
The Ferrari tech analysis from Scarbs. More info on just one page about this car than ive been reading for weeks now on Autosport website. Honestly, why is this guy not getting a full blown contract? It doesnt get any better than this. Autosport GET HIM!!
Edited by kvarbanov, 24 February 2012 - 08:40.
#19
Posted 29 February 2012 - 13:20
@andrewbensonf1: Lotus admit their "chassis problem" was with front suspension mount, say fix has added 1kg to the chassis: http://bit.ly/y7g9cihttp://www.autosport...rt.php/id/97620
Just gonna put this here to see how this one pans out since he didn't, you know, do any journalistic work and is simply speculating.
http://www.autosport...rt.php/id/97730
Advertisement
#20
Posted 29 February 2012 - 15:08