Autosport live test coverage
#1
Posted 10 February 2012 - 13:50
I find the respect on some teams piss poor and the jokes from a very low level.
One team goes for a glory run, the other gets praised into heaven with headline articles for doing similar things.
Its gutter press mentality imo. Hope they have some power of introspection.
Advertisement
#2
Posted 10 February 2012 - 13:56
One team goes for a glory run, the other gets praised into heaven with headline articles for doing similar things.
Let me guess which ones caused you to complain...
Edited by smitten, 10 February 2012 - 13:56.
#3
Posted 10 February 2012 - 14:05
Things are not going well for Ferrari, you can get the hump about it, but thats the perception on the street
#4
Posted 10 February 2012 - 14:12
#5
Posted 10 February 2012 - 14:15
Let me guess which ones caused you to complain...
The one that caused this thread was a mod telling us that we are not allowed to discuss Autosport's Ferrari coverage in the Ferrari thread. That's all
Edited by KnucklesAgain, 10 February 2012 - 14:17.
#6
Posted 10 February 2012 - 14:16
#8
Posted 10 February 2012 - 14:50
Wash your mouth with soap and water son, autosrport articles/comments are written with highest journalistic standards in reagard.A thread about the coverage, since theres been some criticism, wich I share, on it in the racing comments forum.
I find the respect on some teams piss poor and the jokes from a very low level.
One team goes for a glory run, the other gets praised into heaven with headline articles for doing similar things.
Its gutter press mentality imo. Hope they have some power of introspection.
#9
Posted 10 February 2012 - 15:10
Wash your mouth with soap and water son, autosrport articles/comments are written with highest journalistic standards in reagard.
I hope that is sarcasm, because if you truly believe that, you clearly dont know what high standards are.
#10
Posted 10 February 2012 - 20:48
I hope it will stop snowing here.I hope that is sarcasm, because if you truly believe that, you clearly dont know what high standards are.
#11
Posted 11 February 2012 - 07:38
#12
Posted 11 February 2012 - 08:53
This article is completely 1 dimensional ****. It read's like a qualifying session. The only thing it reports on are fastest times, which we all know are meaningless in the first test.
#13
Posted 11 February 2012 - 11:44
The one thing I'd like to see more of is analysis of sector times.
Sector times means too much work for them. This is simply a meet and greet for these faux fat-@rses, on their all expenses paid jaunt to Jerez. To cap it off, their attempts at humour are about as funny "as rabies in a dog home". IMO they should stick to the day job. On second thoughts.
#14
Posted 13 February 2012 - 01:45
That's a blatant slander. Autosport brings the most comprehensive analysis out there, borderline scientific level.http://plus.autospor...1-test-roundup/
This article is completely 1 dimensional ****. It read's like a qualifying session. The only thing it reports on are fastest times, which we all know are meaningless in the first test.
#15
Posted 13 February 2012 - 09:12
#16
Posted 13 February 2012 - 18:12
You know how you say somethig opposite of what it actually is, to highlight how useless it actually is? I believe that's what they call sarcasm.I wasn't slandering Autosport, but that article. Did you read it? Before they took it down...
#17
Posted 13 February 2012 - 18:30
I wasn't slandering Autosport, but that article. Did you read it? Before they took it down...
Took what down? http://www.autosport...rt.php/id/97491
#18
Posted 14 February 2012 - 09:09