Mark Webber on Top Gear this Sunday

I didn't see it, but if Webber was German bashing he's both crass and disrespectful given his new employer.

He wasn't. This thread is a mess.

Mods, maybe time to put it out of its (and our) misery?

From the interview I got that the guy is clearly out of love with f1 now

Hardly surprising. He's been crushed year in year out and now RB are close to bringing in KR, which totally broadsides his ongoing weepy defence that RB systematically protect & favour Vettel. I used to quite like the guy, but he's taken the whole victim role too far lately.

Hardly surprising. He's been crushed year in year out and now RB are close to bringing in KR, which totally broadsides his ongoing weepy defence that RB systematically protect & favour Vettel. I used to quite like the guy, but he's taken the whole victim role too far lately.

how does bringing in KR refute his assertions?
silverstone 2010 MW front wing is given to SV. at the time MW was ahead in the championship. how does this square with you?

More of a mrs Brown's boys fan?

At least Mrs Brown's Boys doesn't tell and unfunny joke and then spend the next 20 minutes explaining...veeeeeery...slowwwwwwly...whyyyyyy...it...is...funny...

Frankly, he's nothing without Richard Herring.

how does bringing in KR refute his assertions?

Oh please, don't be obtuse. Kimi won't play second fiddle, no way, and he would want that in writing. Further, if you only want your second driver to be a lacky for Vettel - who you had to protect from Webber - why on earth bring in one of the fastest, most expensive and least line-toeing men on the grid?

silverstone 2010 MW front wing is given to SV. at the time MW was ahead in the championship. how does this square with you?

Who knows; what I do know is that if Webber was really being properly screwed that far back and was not allowed to show his brilliance at RB then he was pretty dim to stay there.

how does bringing in KR refute his assertions?
silverstone 2010 MW front wing is given to SV. at the time MW was ahead in the championship. how does this square with you?

No. Vettel 115 vs Webber 103 prior to the weekend

'Webber did not want new wing, says engineer'
http://en.espnf1.com...tory/23634.html
http://news.bbc.co.u...one/8807666.stm

No. Vettel 115 vs Webber 103 prior to the weekend

'Webber did not want new wing, says engineer'
http://en.espnf1.com...tory/23634.html
http://news.bbc.co.u...one/8807666.stm

'On Vettel's car' is probably how that quote ends.

Oh please, don't be obtuse. Kimi won't play second fiddle, no way, and he would want that in writing. Further, if you only want your second driver to be a lacky for Vettel - who you had to protect from Webber - why on earth bring in one of the fastest, most expensive and least line-toeing men on the grid?

still didn't answer the question. guess your ad hominem attack replaced your response. never said kimi would play second fiddle so why the strawman.


Who knows; what I do know is that if Webber was really being properly screwed that far back and was not allowed to show his brilliance at RB then he was pretty dim to stay there.

with all those one year contracts where was he gonna go?and who knows is your best response to silverstone 2010?

and who knows is your best response to silverstone 2010?

I suggest you see post #206. I couldn't be arsed to look back, but unfortunately for you someone else did. If you plan to rock up here being all in-yer-face and smart arsed from post #1 you really need to be sure your pivitol facts are correct.

Ah, Silverstone 2010 front wing chat again. Seems as good a sign as any that the thread has run its course.