Why do you think Red Bull didn't offer DC a new contract?
#1
Posted 03 July 2008 - 15:14
Why do you think RBR did not offer DC a new contract?
Advertisement
#2
Posted 03 July 2008 - 15:27
#3
Posted 03 July 2008 - 15:38
#4
Posted 03 July 2008 - 15:39
Doug
#5
Posted 03 July 2008 - 15:43
#6
Posted 03 July 2008 - 15:44
His girlfriend is pregnant.
#7
Posted 03 July 2008 - 15:56
See Option 2Originally posted by djellison
You make the assumption that he was pushed, rather than jumped. On what basis do you state that RB did not or were never going to offer a new contract ro DC?
Doug
#8
Posted 03 July 2008 - 17:26
#9
Posted 03 July 2008 - 17:35
Oh, and I want to get this on the record - Webber will dominate SV next year 2 to 1 in qualy and points.
#10
Posted 03 July 2008 - 18:18
Originally posted by tkulla
(...)Oh, and I want to get this on the record - Webber will dominate SV next year 2 to 1 in qualy and points.
AMEN to that.
I rate Webber highly and would feel pretty stupid if he got bitten by Vettel boy.
#11
Posted 03 July 2008 - 22:37
I hope this is true. Good for DC and congrats.Originally posted by Tomecek
I voted for Because DC WANTED to retire, and he didn't want a new contract, because I know it.
His girlfriend is pregnant.
#12
Posted 04 July 2008 - 04:39
#13
Posted 04 July 2008 - 05:59
Originally posted by Ricardo F1
Because they want Vettel in the seat. And it sounds like they do have a new contract with DC, just not as a racing driver.
Ditto.
Does anyone here think if Vettel goes to RB that this could open up the door for Bruno Senna at STR?
#14
Posted 04 July 2008 - 15:32
#15
Posted 04 July 2008 - 19:37
#16
Posted 04 July 2008 - 23:06
It is. I am in touch with one guy, who used to work for West and is now close friend and in fact colleague of DC. So I hope I have reliable information!Originally posted by Buttoneer
I hope this is true. Good for DC and congrats.
#17
Posted 04 July 2008 - 23:33
Originally posted by djellison
You make the assumption that he was pushed, rather than jumped. On what basis do you state that RB did not or were never going to offer a new contract ro DC?
Doug
Has there been any sensible answer to this question? Or is it true because someone wrote it on the internet?
#18
Posted 05 July 2008 - 01:05
To be fair to Bruno(which a lot of idiots are not!) he is really holding his own and his pace looks great and he's still inside his limits apparently.
#19
Posted 05 July 2008 - 01:51
#21
Posted 05 July 2008 - 13:42
But I wouldn't generalise that much from quali, Massa, Hamilton also under performed, it was a wind hit quali, I'm sure DC should of been higher up, he's got a good chance for his best race of the year.
#22
Posted 05 July 2008 - 13:44
#23
Posted 05 July 2008 - 13:59
#24
Posted 05 July 2008 - 16:31
Originally posted by SeanValen
It's ashame, I remember a time when DC was fast in quali, I don't think from the 2003 rules onwards he was the same threat in quali as before, he tried the best with his race pace, but he definately lost something through the changes in 2003.
But I wouldn't generalise that much from quali, Massa, Hamilton also under performed, it was a wind hit quali, I'm sure DC should of been higher up, he's got a good chance for his best race of the year.
Yes he has a chance of getting a good result tomorrow due to the weather, but that's not what you want from your driver. This has been going on for years, and probably all of his career- he just doesn't have it in qualifying. There was a time in F1 when 3-4 tenths in qualifying meant 2 or 3 positions, now it means 5 or 6.