Vettel asked by FIA to discuss penalty ??
#1
Posted 02 April 2009 - 10:36
Any word on this one?
"Alan Donnelly has asked to have a chat with Sebastian to go through the rationale behind their penalty,"
Sort of like being asked to come over for tea by the Grand Inquisitor - not a comfortable place to be
Seems like all penalties and decisions are open for review. I think we should go back to the SPA 2008 one and while we are at it the Bennatton fuel tank issue from 1994. Poor decisions there so they need to be reviewed.
Advertisement
#2
Posted 02 April 2009 - 10:37
#3
Posted 02 April 2009 - 10:39
#4
Posted 02 April 2009 - 10:41
I think he meant BAR in 2005 anyway.Originally posted by stevvy1986
benetton weren't in F1 in 2004, renault were
#5
Posted 02 April 2009 - 10:41
In reality though, considering all that has happened lately, I guess it could be absolutely anything
#6
Posted 02 April 2009 - 10:47
Originally posted by stevvy1986
benetton weren't in F1 in 2004, renault were
Thanks meant 1994
Where they had modified their fuel filler - and had a huge fire as a result
#7
Posted 02 April 2009 - 10:55
Regards
Andy
#8
Posted 02 April 2009 - 10:58
#9
Posted 02 April 2009 - 11:04
#10
Posted 02 April 2009 - 11:43
#11
Posted 02 April 2009 - 13:03
Can't get the crown after your dead, and since we are talking 1967, i am probaly the new WDC of 1967Originally posted by jeze
Not to talk about a secret report that Clark's engine was deliberately filled with too little fuel at Monza 1967 It appears that Denny Hulme was the offender, commanded by Jack Brabham. If either of them fail to turn up at a secret assembly in Nairobi, Kenya tomorrow, they'll be stripped of the 1967 title, and Jim Clark will posthumouosly be rewarded with the 1967 crown
#12
Posted 02 April 2009 - 13:05
#13
Posted 02 April 2009 - 13:21
#14
Posted 02 April 2009 - 13:44
That was discussed at lenght in http://forums.autosp...threadid=107308 alreadyOriginally posted by DEVO
Yet another lame penalty. Vettel did nothing wrong even though he blames himself. The video shows he was fine, Kubica on the other has to be kicking himself for not passing on a straight...at the rate he was going he could have overtaken JB.
#15
Posted 02 April 2009 - 14:38
#16
Posted 02 April 2009 - 14:50
Originally posted by Racing Dutchman
Can't get the crown after your dead
1970