Which of the old "Big Three" will win a race first?
#1
Posted 06 April 2009 - 19:02
You can never count out what the engineers from Maranello can produce
Advertisement
#2
Posted 06 April 2009 - 19:11
#3
Posted 06 April 2009 - 19:12
#4
Posted 06 April 2009 - 19:15
#5
Posted 06 April 2009 - 19:16
#6
Posted 06 April 2009 - 19:18
#7
Posted 06 April 2009 - 19:19
#8
Posted 06 April 2009 - 19:20
As of now, Ferrari seems in better shape than McLaren or Renault, but the Chinese upgrades can change things between them. I'd put my money on Ferrari anyhow.
#9
Posted 06 April 2009 - 19:32
Originally posted by Atreiu
IMO, the big three would have Williams and not Renault, even though Williams hasn't won in a very long while.
big three i mean the last 3 teams to win wdc/wcc and more then 1 race a year.
#10
Posted 06 April 2009 - 19:34
I fancy Lewis Hamilton.
#11
Posted 06 April 2009 - 19:48
Which two teams are you referring to?
#12
Posted 06 April 2009 - 19:53
#13
Posted 06 April 2009 - 19:55
Originally posted by raiseyourfistfor
big three i mean the last 3 teams to win wdc/wcc and more then 1 race a year.
I know.
#14
Posted 06 April 2009 - 19:57
Originally posted by mursuka80
I hope none of them wins,so tv ratings plummet and Bernie loses money
Believe it or not, TV ratings are up in the UK by ~25% even without the big three winning.
#15
Posted 06 April 2009 - 19:57
#16
Posted 06 April 2009 - 20:01
sure..that's what everybody said kimi would do when he comes to ferrariOriginally posted by jesee
On balance you have to say the fastest car of the three seems to be Ferari. So they should be able to do it. I can bet my bottom dollar that if it was lewis or alonso in that car, we wouldn't be talking of diffusors, but evenly matched car to brawn-gp.
show the whole world bla bla, wipe the floor with massa etc
it's not like on tv ninja
lewis or alonso in their cars show exactly that a good driver needs a good car.
neither lewis nor alonso would have done ANYTHING about the 3 out 4 race ending failures of ferrari in the last 2 races.
#17
Posted 06 April 2009 - 20:07
#18
Posted 06 April 2009 - 21:51
ooo er.Originally posted by Dalek Caan
I fancy Lewis Hamilton.
#19
Posted 06 April 2009 - 21:57
Advertisement
#20
Posted 06 April 2009 - 21:58
Originally posted by D.M.N.
Believe it or not, TV ratings are up in the UK by ~25% even without the big three winning.
Source? And are those figures for Malaysia?
#21
Posted 06 April 2009 - 21:59
Originally posted by Dalek Caan
Source? And are those figures for Malaysia?
http://www.f1fanatic...-races-of-2009/
#22
Posted 06 April 2009 - 22:41
Originally posted by giacomo
Hamilton always makes his way through the field, even from rubbish grid positions.
My vote is recorded thusly.
#23
Posted 06 April 2009 - 22:52
Originally posted by giacomo
Hamilton always makes his way through the field, even from rubbish grid positions.
Just imagine if they'd put him on inters at his frst stop...
#24
Posted 06 April 2009 - 22:59
Bernie will be pleased and use this to further his agenda of nightraces in Asia.Originally posted by D.M.N.
Believe it or not, TV ratings are up in the UK by ~25% even without the big three winning.
First win for a big three team, I'd say Ferrari if they clean up their act.
#25
Posted 06 April 2009 - 23:06
Originally posted by D.M.N.
Believe it or not, TV ratings are up in the UK by ~25% even without the big three winning.
That may be because the BIG 3 aren't winning. Which I like.
#26
Posted 06 April 2009 - 23:11
Originally posted by Dalek Caan
I fancy Lewis Hamilton.
I'm not at all sure his girlfriend would appreciate that
#27
Posted 06 April 2009 - 23:30
#28
Posted 07 April 2009 - 00:29
Oi!! I got there firstOriginally posted by tifosi
I'm not at all sure his girlfriend would appreciate that
;)
#29
Posted 07 April 2009 - 01:14
Originally posted by Yellowmc
Ferrari, IMO, greatest potential and Kimi has been in 2 good positions to only throw it away.
Malaysia was more of a team decision. It was obvious after 2-3 laps that their plan had failed.
But, yes, Ferrari will get the win. Renault (how are they a top 3 team?) and McLaren just have had too many issues in testing and the first two races. Both teams have drivers on the verge of losing their jobs. Ferrari has pretty much got this in the bag, and I would expect by the time F1 makes it to Europe, they will have already scored a win.
#30
Posted 07 April 2009 - 01:17
Originally posted by Ivan
That may be because the BIG 3 aren't winning. Which I like.
I'd rather wonder whether its gonna be mclaren or ferrari that are going to win instead of button running away with it unchallenged TBQH.
#31
Posted 07 April 2009 - 04:37
Originally posted by undersquare
Just imagine if they'd put him on inters at his frst stop...
Correctamundo.
Hamilton is showing his grit. This is why I cheer him on. He's got "it". I see more Mansell than Senna in him.
#32
Posted 07 April 2009 - 04:42
Originally posted by D.M.N.
Believe it or not, TV ratings are up in the UK by ~25% even without the big three winning.
Not just the UK, also Germany but IMHO that has got more to do with the more "civilized" starting times for European viewers than anything else.
I`d wait for the first euro races for a conclusion.
#33
Posted 07 April 2009 - 04:43
Originally posted by tifosi
I'm not at all sure his girlfriend would appreciate that
I`ll take care of her ...
#34
Posted 07 April 2009 - 05:29
hamilton has the ability to get a shock result for mclaren but with the recent negativity I think his heart wont be in it for a while.
#35
Posted 07 April 2009 - 05:44
#36
Posted 07 April 2009 - 05:46
Originally posted by undersquare
Just imagine if they'd put him on inters at his frst stop...
Just imagine if Ferrari had not put Kimi on fullwets at his first stop... and put him on inters after it actually started raining...
#37
Posted 07 April 2009 - 06:01
Originally posted by Tomerell
Just imagine if Ferrari had not put Kimi on fullwets at his first stop... and put him on inters after it actually started raining...
Fair point. No-one understands that decision, also I don't understand why Mac didn't roll the dice, they had so little to lose. But still smarting from Monza Q perhaps.
Curious how human these decisions are, when you might think the data would make them.
#38
Posted 07 April 2009 - 06:04
#39
Posted 07 April 2009 - 06:04
Curious how human these decisions are, when you might think the data would make them.
Spot on
Advertisement
#40
Posted 07 April 2009 - 08:36
I rather thought they would be the third choice in the poll too, and they've been there or thereabouts in both races, even if partly due to circumstances. Toyota could be part of the Big Three if they are rated on budget too.Originally posted by stonebutter
BMW
BMW, Toyota or Red Bull look more like winning than any of the options above, Ferrari just need a straight race with no massive errors to demonstrate their pace, McLaren have serious issues to resolve before we can really say where they stand and Renault don't look much more sorted than the McLaren, though they can at least make it to Q3.
#41
Posted 07 April 2009 - 09:23
Still, if you have a bit longer memory, if you hear "big three" being said then immediately Ferrari, McLaren and Williams tend to come to mind. Just an observation.Originally posted by raiseyourfistfor
big three i mean the last 3 teams to win wdc/wcc and more then 1 race a year.
#42
Posted 07 April 2009 - 10:24
#43
Posted 07 April 2009 - 15:01
#44
Posted 07 April 2009 - 15:42
#45
Posted 07 April 2009 - 16:52
Originally posted by stonebutter
BMW
#46
Posted 07 April 2009 - 18:33
+1Originally posted by stonebutter
BMW
#47
Posted 07 April 2009 - 18:35
I dont think any team will. They are two far behind with too many other good competitors. If they do it will be in a whacky race imhoOriginally posted by raiseyourfistfor
I'm thinking Ferrari, even if they had the worst start to the year so far.
You can never count out what the engineers from Maranello can produce