Should Prost have been disqualified from the World Championship in 89 for intentionally punting Senna of the track and so winning the 89 World Championship.
POLL: Susuka 89
Started by
Ali_G
, Oct 15 2000 21:33
3 replies to this topic
Advertisement
#2
Jhope
-
- 9,440 posts
- Joined: February 00
Member
Posted 15 October 2000 - 21:42
personally, a poll like this doesn't belong in this forum.
since when is racing supposed to be about disqualifications?
since when is racing supposed to be about disqualifications?
#3
Marco94
-
- 393 posts
- Joined: December 99
Member
Posted 16 October 2000 - 08:18
Ali_G,
Prost didn't win the WDC because he collided with Senna, but Senna lost it because he didn't have enough points! Remember Adelaide? Senna had to win there as well.
Marco.
Prost didn't win the WDC because he collided with Senna, but Senna lost it because he didn't have enough points! Remember Adelaide? Senna had to win there as well.
Marco.
#4
Hans Etzrodt
-
- 3,188 posts
- Joined: July 00
Member
Posted 16 October 2000 - 09:24
Ali,
I remember that Prost did not intentionally punt Senna, but he sure 'closed the door' on him. I replayed my video recording time and again and found Prost not at fault. I liked both drivers.
I remember that Prost did not intentionally punt Senna, but he sure 'closed the door' on him. I replayed my video recording time and again and found Prost not at fault. I liked both drivers.
