How did Frentzen slip away from f1 so quietly?
#1
Posted 10 January 2010 - 21:15
Oh that makes alot of sense doesnt it. Frentzen was driving like a champion in 99 and 'if' he were in a ferrari that year would've beat mika to the title wouldn't you say?
I heard he was doing some german touring car racing the other year but i can't believe he wan't being hunted down ruthlessly by top teams after such a good year in 99. Anyone know whether he just decided to pack it in?
Advertisement
#2
Posted 10 January 2010 - 21:17
Yes, Frentzen would have been far better driver for Toyota than the ones they had at the time...
#3
Posted 10 January 2010 - 21:20
#4
Posted 10 January 2010 - 21:23
Observe Jarno Trulli up until and including Monaco 2004, putting pressure on Alonso, his best season, even if it was half of one before he was let go by Briatore.
Frentzen admitted I remember it was his own fault he didn't excel at Williams in 1997, but he did in 1999, 1999 we also had Rubens looking good in that Steward car, Rubens was hot property coming into ferrari in 2000 after 1999.
It shows how difficult it is to be consistently good in f1, not every driver likes every car, I'm sure Fisi can beat alot of drivers in a bad car but put him in a really good one and he won't do the business for some reason, it's odd, but not all drivers excel everytime.
And speaking about Frentzen, he never to me looked like someone with absolute conviction that he wanted to win the title, he always looked like he was blessed to just be in f1, he was content in not being under pressure situations and responsility of leading a team for wins. Truli is of the same boat as well, occassional performers.
Edited by Gareth, 12 January 2010 - 10:39.
Removing OT segment on Alonso/Trulli/Flav
#5
Posted 10 January 2010 - 21:25
Early day Heidfeld? certain drivers just seem to slip under the radar.
Yes, it is quite a parallel to the slipping of Heidfeld, and again unfairly so. Both are/were sublime and very efficient drivers, but probably exactly that is the reason why this type of drivers is so readily overlooked: not sensational enough, not enough PR-impact, and just not, even by an iota, fast enough. Without the 2009 season, Jenson Button could have ended up in the same category.
So if you address the question more broadly (the Frentzen/Heidfeld type of driver) it has a place in RC, otherwise this thread may end up in NF.
Edited by aditya-now, 10 January 2010 - 21:26.
#6
Posted 10 January 2010 - 21:33
#7
Posted 10 January 2010 - 21:49
#8
Posted 10 January 2010 - 22:18
Early day Heidfeld? certain drivers just seem to slip under the radar.
The difference is that Frentzen was very much on the radar. He joined Williams at the height of their competitiveness and disappointed.
#9
Posted 10 January 2010 - 22:34
#10
Posted 10 January 2010 - 22:40
#11
Posted 10 January 2010 - 22:47
For me, probably the biggest under-achiever of the last 20 years. Shame
I don't know about that. He won a race, which is a lot more than Jan Magnussen did.
#12
Posted 10 January 2010 - 22:52
#13
Posted 10 January 2010 - 23:00
True, but that's partially the point; JM never convinced me he could 'get it done' in F1. H2F, on the other hand, showed at times (such as Jordan '99) what he was capable of and what could have been. SFW signed him because he was reputed to be the man who was faster than MS, which in a way I suspect he was; difference is, I guess, that MS brought a raft of other qualities/characteristics to the party.I don't know about that. He won a race, which is a lot more than Jan Magnussen did.
#14
Posted 10 January 2010 - 23:01
#15
Posted 10 January 2010 - 23:11
True, but that's partially the point; JM never convinced me he could 'get it done' in F1. H2F, on the other hand, showed at times (such as Jordan '99) what he was capable of and what could have been. SFW signed him because he was reputed to be the man who was faster than MS, which in a way I suspect he was; difference is, I guess, that MS brought a raft of other qualities/characteristics to the party.
And I would bet that if Frank could do that one over again, he'd still hire Frentzen. But he and Patrick Head would provide him with the support he needed instead of expecting him to be Alan Jones.
#16
Posted 10 January 2010 - 23:15
He put that Prost on p4 at Spa. That was special... back in them days with the time spread we had.
He was special in places like Spa....
I always thought his weakness was development and setup. Had a ton of natural talent and tended to "drive" around problems rather than solving them. I remember P. Head complaining that HHF could get lost in setup at times - leading the engineers on a wild goose chase.
#17
Posted 11 January 2010 - 00:04
Recap from the French GP in 1999, one of hist best races http://www.youtube.c...feature=related
Other classic HHF moment when gave Mark Blundell the finger in Adelaide 1995. Video
Edited by Romulus, 11 January 2010 - 00:08.
#18
Posted 11 January 2010 - 00:25
True, but that's partially the point; JM never convinced me he could 'get it done' in F1. H2F, on the other hand, showed at times (such as Jordan '99) what he was capable of and what could have been. SFW signed him because he was reputed to be the man who was faster than MS, which in a way I suspect he was; difference is, I guess, that MS brought a raft of other qualities/characteristics to the party.
He, who would have thought we'd agree about a driver one day...
Talent-wise, Frentzen was second to none. But from what I've seen he was too much of an introvert and ultimately lacked ambition to succeed. IMO it all just didn't mean that much to him.
In a way it's a shame, at the same time we have to accept that's the man he is. Talent alone just isn't enough.
Advertisement
#20
Posted 11 January 2010 - 02:40
Maybe i'm, just getting older but i can't help but think people like mika/ frentzen and jv could do alot better than some of the newbies filtering into f1.
#21
Posted 11 January 2010 - 04:30
And I would bet that if Frank could do that one over again, he'd still hire Frentzen. But he and Patrick Head would provide him with the support he needed instead of expecting him to be Alan Jones.
I've heard that Frank and Patrick expect all their drivers to be "Alan Jones". Jones gave the team their first success (even though Regazzoni won their first GP) and it seems they've never quite accepted the fact that Jones isn't there anymore.
#22
Posted 11 January 2010 - 05:44
I place HeinZweiDrei Frentzen in the rare breed of drivers capable of sustaining a middle team in the grid.
Good speed and development skillz.
I place him in a pedestal together with Barrichello and Paniz.
Nobody notices them, but as a pattern, once they left their teams, the middle sized teams started to fade until the bitter end.
IMO these kind of drivers are paramount to F1.
#23
Posted 11 January 2010 - 06:45
In HHF's case I always thought that he needed an arm around his shoulder when he was at Williams. My impression is that he did not get it.
#24
Posted 11 January 2010 - 07:51
Totally deserved. It was outrageous of Blundell not to let him through earlier.
I'm espacially impresssed of him doing it while entering the corner under braking!!!
#25
Posted 11 January 2010 - 09:04
Drivers, quite rightly, get judged on their F1 performances by the F1 community. To be a front running F1 driver, they need to be the complete package. Some drivers have all of the driving skills necessary to succeed in F1 but do not have the man-management skills to project their ambition into their team and mould the team around themselves. We see drivers who come into F1 and look to have a big future in the sport. Yet when they move on to a bigger team that should deliver them race wins and championship challenges they seem to evaporate. If a driver does not feel at home with his team and his engineers he will not produce his best.
In HHF's case I always thought that he needed an arm around his shoulder when he was at Williams. My impression is that he did not get it.
It's kind of ironic that Frentzen was the driver that Frank Williams pushed hard to get ever since the death of Ayrton Senna. Yet when they finally did get him, he wasn't what they hoped he'd be, so they gave him to Jordan so that they could have Ralf Schumacher.
#26
Posted 11 January 2010 - 09:19
And I would bet that if Frank could do that one over again, he'd still hire Frentzen. But he and Patrick Head would provide him with the support he needed instead of expecting him to be Alan Jones.
Frank said once that replacing Damon Hill with Frentzen was his biggest mistake.
#27
Posted 11 January 2010 - 09:47
As for HHF I always liked him, he seemed like a seriously cool guy and by Christ was he quick on his day.
#28
Posted 11 January 2010 - 09:50
#29
Posted 11 January 2010 - 10:04
We have our moments.He, who would have thought we'd agree about a driver one day...
Talent-wise, Frentzen was second to none. But from what I've seen he was too much of an introvert and ultimately lacked ambition to succeed. IMO it all just didn't mean that much to him.
In a way it's a shame, at the same time we have to accept that's the man he is. Talent alone just isn't enough.
As pjg said, I'm inclined to think that HH just didn't have the confidence, drive and power of character to make a team come to him and work for him in the same was MS did. Almost a case of being to nice a guy.
#30
Posted 11 January 2010 - 10:07
#31
Posted 11 January 2010 - 10:31
Wasn't Heinz-Harald Frentzen regarded as a better driver than Michael Schumacher, prior to them arriving in Formula One?
Yes! Even Karl Wendlinger was regarded as a better driver than Schumi before joining in Formula One. According to Peter Sauber, MS, KW & HHF drove for Mercedes-Junior / Sauber Motor-Sport in the early years, that Frentzen was the man with the most talent, but it came to nothing. When Frentzen made jokes with the mechanics, Schumacher was working in the garage oder even on the circuit. Schumacher was the most professionell of them.
Even Senna said, that Frentzen was a big talent.
Frentzen and Williams were a bad match. He needed a "good" environment, in Germany we called it "Warmes Zuhause" or so, not an adverse environment ;)
#32
Posted 11 January 2010 - 10:52
HHF was quite good, but tended to have problems in his teams for whatever reason. It was Williams, Jordan and then even at Sauber in the end he wasn't exactly happy. If he had the team fully supporting, he was quite a quick driver. IMO he was the best driver in 1999.
Nowadays he's again under the radar, testing from time to time a Gumbert Apollo and stopped racing in the DTM, I think he didn't get a win there. Wendlinger made a career in GT racing, but he doesn't have the many millions from F1.
#33
Posted 11 January 2010 - 10:56
#34
Posted 11 January 2010 - 10:58
#35
Posted 11 January 2010 - 11:54
Frank said once that replacing Damon Hill with Frentzen was his biggest mistake.
Maybe it was, but ever since the mid 90s Frank has been constantly looking for the next Schumacher, and passing on other more talented drivers in the process.
H H Frentzen
Ralf Schumacher
Nico Rosberg
and now Nico Hulkenburg
Edited by johnmhinds, 11 January 2010 - 11:56.
#36
Posted 11 January 2010 - 12:03
#38
Posted 11 January 2010 - 12:22
#39
Posted 11 January 2010 - 15:09
I believe Frank Williams also said that his biggest regret was not signing Michael Schumacher.
When did he ever have the chance to sign Schumacher?
#41
Posted 11 January 2010 - 15:23
Eddie Jordan said that frentzen was a nightmare bcs he wanted to interfere everywhere in the car development, guiding the engineers.
Of course, to act that way, the driver must feel welcome by the technical department.
At Williams, an "engineer team", even Senna felt ignored/unconfortable when asking for modifications in the car.
At McLaren, the mechanics would rush to attend every milimetric change request about anything.
So Frentzen and Williams was a mismatch.
#42
Posted 11 January 2010 - 15:29
I though that Frank Williams said that his biggest regret was signing Mark Webber.I believe Frank Williams also said that his biggest regret was not signing Michael Schumacher.
#43
Posted 11 January 2010 - 15:51
While I love the guy, Zanardi was probably one of their worst signings.
#44
Posted 11 January 2010 - 16:29
The problem is Frentzen wasn't the best suited driver in terms of mental fortitude for Williams environment.
Eddie Jordan said that frentzen was a nightmare bcs he wanted to interfere everywhere in the car development, guiding the engineers.
Of course, to act that way, the driver must feel welcome by the technical department.
At Williams, an "engineer team", even Senna felt ignored/unconfortable when asking for modifications in the car.
At McLaren, the mechanics would rush to attend every milimetric change request about anything.
So Frentzen and Williams was a mismatch.
just read maurice hamiltons book on frank williams, bloody good read and a lot of nice stories/comments. One was by alex wurtz, he says at an early test session he made some comments on the handling and gave theories that he thought the suspension geometry needed changed, by the second test there was new geometry on the car. Wurtz says he was shocked at the speed of resonse as some teams would take half a season to be convinced of a mistake and that he's never worked for a team that is so ready to listen to it's drivers. He claims that if patrick trusts you he'll listen to anything you say, maybe he just didn't trust frentzen?
#45
Posted 11 January 2010 - 16:32
I've heard that Frank and Patrick expect all their drivers to be "Alan Jones". Jones gave the team their first success (even though Regazzoni won their first GP) and it seems they've never quite accepted the fact that Jones isn't there anymore.
i don't think it's that they can't accept jones isn't there, it's just that they are a couple of pragmatic and self contained characters who don't think drivers should be mollycoddled.
#46
Posted 11 January 2010 - 16:32
#47
Posted 11 January 2010 - 16:43
#48
Posted 11 January 2010 - 19:39
The problem is Frentzen wasn't the best suited driver in terms of mental fortitude for Williams environment.
Heinz probably had a hard time looking up the pit lane seeing Corinna in the Ferrari garage and dwelling on what could have been.
#49
Posted 11 January 2010 - 19:44
I though that Frank Williams said that his biggest regret was signing Mark Webber.
Well, apparently he had many regrets.
#50
Posted 11 January 2010 - 19:56