"He's got the magnets on (WTF does that MEAN????) and you could throw a blanket over them"
....."back to the stripe...."
Posted 16 September 2010 - 09:24
"He's got the magnets on (WTF does that MEAN????) and you could throw a blanket over them"
Advertisement
Posted 16 September 2010 - 09:58
Posted 16 September 2010 - 10:59
Edited by Kucki, 16 September 2010 - 11:00.
Posted 16 September 2010 - 11:01
Posted 16 September 2010 - 11:47
Hello all, fascinating subject so I thought I would contribute.
I'm afraid I'll go against the majority on here and say I honestly don't have a problem with Legard at all. OK, he rambles and "charges" and "goes up hill's" but I don't find that irritating.
Truth is if Legard is replaced by, say Charlie Cox for argument's sake, he will be moaned about at the same level because it's the Internet. Forums will still be full of people complaining about the commentary because that what forums are for. There aren't many forum's made to congratulate people, only to criticise. I also think people underestimate how difficult commentary is. I've tried with the sound down and I either run out of breath or go into ultrasonic, which upsets the dog next door.
Murray made it sound so effortless, but Allen and Legard clearly A) don't have his experience and B) don't have his skill. There will never be another Murray Walker and I think people need to accept that. Yes, there is better than Legard (Ben Edwards for example) and, in my view, there is worse (Carlton Kirby), but we can't always have the best all of the time. The discussions I've read through (Digital Spy, BBC and here) show there isn't one popular consensus (probably with the exception of Ben Edwards) so the Forum moaning will still continue.
Whatever you think of Legard, just take a minute to think about Martin Brundle in all of this. If the Daily Mail is accurate (stranger things have happened) what gives him the right to dictate to his bosses who to employee/sack? If that's true, my opinion of him has just shot through the floor. He's the ex-driver invited by the BBC. Legard is the commentator employed by the BBC. Brundle doesn't have a right to throw his substantial weight around. Yes he has to stand there with Legard but even still, he is a professional. Get on with it Martin instead of backstabbing. If Legard wasn't aware of Brundle's opinion before, the commentary in Singapore is going to be veryfrosty indeed.
Thanks all for reading through my first rambling post.
Posted 16 September 2010 - 11:52
Brundle started doing F1 for the BBC at the same time as Legard, quite where you get this "he was invited" thing from I don't know - he is employed by the BBC (directly or indirectly) just like Legard and is doing a far better job.
Posted 16 September 2010 - 12:12
Posted 16 September 2010 - 12:17
Hello all, fascinating subject so I thought I would contribute.
I'm afraid I'll go against the majority on here and say I honestly don't have a problem with Legard at all. OK, he rambles and "charges" and "goes up hill's" but I don't find that irritating.
Truth is if Legard is replaced by, say Charlie Cox for argument's sake, he will be moaned about at the same level because it's the Internet. Forums will still be full of people complaining about the commentary because that what forums are for. There aren't many forum's made to congratulate people, only to criticise. I also think people underestimate how difficult commentary is. I've tried with the sound down and I either run out of breath or go into ultrasonic, which upsets the dog next door.
Murray made it sound so effortless, but Allen and Legard clearly A) don't have his experience and B) don't have his skill. There will never be another Murray Walker and I think people need to accept that. Yes, there is better than Legard (Ben Edwards for example) and, in my view, there is worse (Carlton Kirby), but we can't always have the best all of the time. The discussions I've read through (Digital Spy, BBC and here) show there isn't one popular consensus (probably with the exception of Ben Edwards) so the Forum moaning will still continue.
Whatever you think of Legard, just take a minute to think about Martin Brundle in all of this. If the Daily Mail is accurate (stranger things have happened) what gives him the right to dictate to his bosses who to employee/sack? If that's true, my opinion of him has just shot through the floor. He's the ex-driver invited by the BBC. Legard is the commentator employed by the BBC. Brundle doesn't have a right to throw his substantial weight around. Yes he has to stand there with Legard but even still, he is a professional. Get on with it Martin instead of backstabbing. If Legard wasn't aware of Brundle's opinion before, the commentary in Singapore is going to be veryfrosty indeed.
Thanks all for reading through my first rambling post.
Posted 16 September 2010 - 12:44
Posted 16 September 2010 - 12:57
Looks like it ends this year.Is it possible for Legard to be dropped for next season or does he have a contract of sorts for next year?
Posted 16 September 2010 - 13:15
Legard is not on contract, he is a BBC staff member. They could remove him from the F1 gig, but they'd have to find him a job somewhere else.Looks like it ends this year.
Posted 16 September 2010 - 14:49
Legard is not on contract, he is a BBC staff member. They could remove him from the F1 gig, but they'd have to find him a job somewhere else.
Posted 16 September 2010 - 14:54
or do the tiddlywinks championship
Posted 16 September 2010 - 14:56
Posted 16 September 2010 - 15:06
Posted 16 September 2010 - 15:14
There it goes.. in the air.. over the hill... into the cup.
Posted 16 September 2010 - 21:34
Posted 17 September 2010 - 14:54
Posted 17 September 2010 - 15:58
This is payback for all the idiots that hated the knowledgable, passionate and charismatic James Allen for no reason.
Posted 17 September 2010 - 16:04
There weren't many real reasons, it just came down to preference. I thought Allen sounded excited, not smarmy at all...That's the sort of gushing, brown-nosing, smarmy language that Allen used to use all the time - and which gave many intelligent people good reason to dislike him.
Posted 17 September 2010 - 17:52
Posted 17 September 2010 - 19:36
FWIW Allen wasn't that bad I don't think, remember he replaced Murray, who it has to be said did get overexcited every so often himself.
At least Allen knew what the feck was going on..
Posted 17 September 2010 - 19:37
Edited by Garagiste, 17 September 2010 - 19:38.
Posted 17 September 2010 - 19:44
+1The way he used questions that he patently knew the answer to in order to educate the viewer really got on my wick - "Tell me Martin, what do they mean by tyres?" Just ask MB to talk about the tyres, rather than making yourself sound like a berk FFS!
Posted 17 September 2010 - 21:47
Edited by Jimmy, 17 September 2010 - 21:54.
Posted 17 September 2010 - 21:55
No-brainer. Some of the Allen criticism is like something you'd expect to hear from a typical school bully.So... What would viewers rather hear, Martin Brundle's answer to the "tyres" question -- which, in reality -- was probably more like "what do we mean by tyres graining".
Or:
Vettel now. Over the hill and into two.
Webber... The lead is three seconds. Needs to push on now.
Button. Biding his time in the McLaren.
Rosberg. What can this man do?
Hamilton. Chasing hard as comes across the line. 1:23.5. Not good enough.
Posted 17 September 2010 - 21:58
Posted 17 September 2010 - 23:02
I'd quite like Allen to come back. Or if Karun is free.
Whoever they choose, they CANNOT get another dud. They need to test him out properly with a random test audience.
What about a woman? How would that go down?
Advertisement
Posted 18 September 2010 - 00:06
Better the school bully than the school toast rack.No-brainer. Some of the Allen criticism is like something you'd expect to hear from a typical school bully.
Posted 18 September 2010 - 07:42
I'd quite like Allen to come back. Or if Karun is free.
Whoever they choose, they CANNOT get another dud. They need to test him out properly with a random test audience.
What about a woman? How would that go down?
Posted 18 September 2010 - 13:30
Look how it turned out when they tried it with football! It wouldn't go down well.
Posted 18 September 2010 - 14:02
After reading the latest developments on the BBC coverage thread, I thought it might be helpful to gauge people's opinions through the results of a poll.
Murray Walker is not included as he is officially retired, and neither are broadcasters such as Anthony Davidson or Karun Chandhok because they are colour commentators.
Posted 18 September 2010 - 14:22
Can't say that you're not proving my point!Better the school bully than the school toast rack.
Posted 18 September 2010 - 14:40
Posted 18 September 2010 - 18:09
What have the beeb got to lose by letting brundle have a crack at lead comentator?
Bring in a more recent f1 driver to join him at the start of next year,or maybe the
last couple of races this year, if it doesnt work, it doesnt work.
They can still bring in edwards or whoever (not allen).
Posted 19 September 2010 - 00:50
Why would that have anything to do with it? There are sports that have women commentators so just because it didn't work with football doesn't mean it couldn't with F1
Posted 19 September 2010 - 00:51
What have the beeb got to lose by letting brundle have a crack at lead comentator?
Bring in a more recent f1 driver to join him at the start of next year,or maybe the
last couple of races this year, if it doesnt work, it doesnt work.
They can still bring in edwards or whoever (not allen).
Posted 19 September 2010 - 07:55
Posted 19 September 2010 - 14:31
Well strip my bed and steal my clothes!Ben Edwards is perfect for the job for me.
I don't mind Charlie Cox, but he would get on the nerves of 99% of the people on the boards with his "he's got the magnets on", "across the stripe" banter, just as much as the Leg's "up the hill", "on a charge" stuff...
Posted 19 September 2010 - 14:33
Posted 19 September 2010 - 16:03
I think you guys would quickly grow tired of this style of commentary
Posted 19 September 2010 - 16:21
I think you guys would quickly grow tired of this style of commentary
Posted 19 September 2010 - 17:51
I think you guys would quickly grow tired of this style of commentary
Posted 19 September 2010 - 18:03
Edited by Kucki, 19 September 2010 - 18:05.
Posted 19 September 2010 - 18:50
Posted 19 September 2010 - 19:23
Exactly my thoughts!I had to look twice there. I thought initially it was Richard Hammond.
Posted 19 September 2010 - 20:38