Photos from the 'Golden Era'
#1
Posted 24 November 2010 - 15:13
I have been fortunate enough to inherit a couple of boxes of prints/proofs taken in the pre-WWII years when M-B and A-U were strutting their stuff, which I would very much like to share with you all. However, before I post any images, I would just like to be advised by those here more experienced as to whether there is a copyright issue. About a third of the photos have the following legend rubber-stamped on the back: 'This photograph is Copyright of KODAK LTD., and if reproduced must be acknowledged as "Taken by G. C. MONKHOUSE on KODAK S.S. PAN FILM."'
To me, in my optimism, this means that they don't mind it being reproduced as long as the above acknowledgement is made with each image, but these were done a long time before the wondernet, so can I or not? And has the Monkhouse estate (if there is still such a thing) regained copyright of the images?
Also, although the vast majority of the photos appear to be very consistently professional from both composition and technical attributes, most of them are not so stamped - there is no other provenance and my aged aunt from whom they came had no idea how her husband had obtained them (he built and sprinted/climbed quite a well-known Shelsley Special, but that's another story, hopefully to be introduced soon).
I look forward to your authoritative opinions.
Cheers,
Richard
Advertisement
#2
Posted 24 November 2010 - 15:59
http://www.motorgraphs.com/index.php
Very few British photographers worked on GP racing at that time and if the pictures are as professional as you suggest then if not Monkhouse's they may very well be by Robert Fellowes or Louis Klemantaski, both of whose work is also still in copyright.
My suggestion would be to post one or two, though (with a suitable disclaimer) - if they are by the real pros I'm sure we can probably identify the snappers concerned: just be prepared to remove them quickly if necessary!
Edited by Vitesse2, 24 November 2010 - 16:02.
#3
Posted 24 November 2010 - 16:34
#4
Posted 24 November 2010 - 19:45
Roger Lund
#5
Posted 24 November 2010 - 19:49
#6
Posted 24 November 2010 - 21:07
I know he was, Richard. That was the whole point of identifying Kodak as the copyright holder. There is a difference in whether the terms under which he took the shots were as their servant/agent/employee, or whether he was , presumably the case with other photographs in the Monkhouse archives where they may have been of his own creation/ownership, like Jenks, the owner of his work with, in Jenks' case, Motor Sport having, as I understand it, a single use of his work, presumably reflected in the price for the work. I always understood, rightly or wrongly, that the colour film etc which Monkhouse used was supplied by and and owned by Kodak.George Monkhouse worked for Kodak, Roger!
I will be interesting to see to whom the other 2/3rds of the shots can be attributed. Either way, it will be a joy to have the opportunity to see any of them.
Roger Lund
#7
Posted 24 November 2010 - 22:06
I wonder if these prints might be freebies that he used to hand out at his talks and film shows?
#8
Posted 24 November 2010 - 22:12
I will be interesting to see to whom the other 2/3rds of the shots can be attributed. Either way, it will be a joy to have the opportunity to see any of them.
Roger Lund
Hear hear, I can only second that.
#9
Posted 24 November 2010 - 23:06
I've got a photo in front of me from the 1952 IOM TT which clearly states "Photograph supplied by Paul Popper Ltd, to whom the reproduction fee is to be paid and voucher copy sent" Pretty clear message there.
Edited by Redneb, 24 November 2010 - 23:06.
#10
Posted 25 November 2010 - 16:44
Watch this thread!
Cheers,
Richard
#11
Posted 25 November 2010 - 17:20
My first does appear on Motorgraphs site without photographer's identity, but I have a similar shot taken either soon before or soon after which they do not display: Muller's C-type being worked on at the 1938 German GP:
same as Motorgraphs (although their's is rotated 90 right!
removed as suggested
extra image:
More to come,
Cheers,
Richard
Edited by ratkinso, 25 November 2010 - 19:13.
#12
Posted 25 November 2010 - 17:57
#13
Posted 25 November 2010 - 18:46
Use of any material contained on this website is strictly prohibited for use on any other Internet site
#14
Posted 25 November 2010 - 19:12
From Motorgraph's Terms and Conditions (on the website)
Use of any material contained on this website is strictly prohibited for use on any other Internet site
Thank you for that - should have looked more thoroughly at conditions (should have looked - full stop). Although the source was not their site, but my print. Apologies to Motorgraph and will remove link. Will restrict to those not on their site in future. Do you think that will be OK?
Cheers,
Richard
#15
Posted 25 November 2010 - 19:12
Lovely shots though they are, I'm afraid my advice would be to remove them. Especially the first one!
#16
Posted 25 November 2010 - 19:20
Well, up to a point. But they have many, many, many pictures which are not on their site. The problem will be that you may go to all the trouble of scanning them, only to have to remove them again. A PM to Doug Nye about this probably wouldn't go amiss and may save you a lot of time and grief.Apologies to Motorgraph and will remove link. Will restrict to those not on their site in future. Do you think that will be OK?
Cheers,
Richard
#17
Posted 25 November 2010 - 22:36
DCN
#18
Posted 25 November 2010 - 23:08
When it comes to photograph copyright litigation, DCN would be top of my expert witness list.
Case rested, m'lud.
#19
Posted 26 November 2010 - 09:32
DCN
Advertisement
#20
Posted 26 November 2010 - 19:19
Apologies for needlessly whetting appetites, but I hope to be posting photos that I know were taken by my uncle at pre-war Shelsley and speed trial meetings, and some images from immediately post WWII on the resumption of racing in GB.
For instance, from Sept 1937 Shelsley (would welcome identification!),
Should be more up soon,
Cheers,
Richard
#21
Posted 26 November 2010 - 21:58
removed as suggested
such a relief to know that we won't have to see those images without paying their rightful owners; when they just copyright the colours black, white and sepia i will be happy.
have just been looking at another year's bumper crop of poorly written and edited coffee table books, aimed at interests like ours, remaindered in the mall.
we can be sure of many more to come. pleased also to report my regional library is now perfectly innocent of Chris Nixon, Automobile Year etc., etc ....
("Oh - it's good to be alive, in nineteen eighty-five!" 'Mad' Dan Eccles)
Edited by fnqvmuch, 26 November 2010 - 22:08.