F10 (Codename 281) Ferrari
#6701
Posted 27 August 2010 - 19:23
Advertisement
#6702
Posted 27 August 2010 - 19:28
What exactly are we looking for?F10's front slot diffuser:
http://photos.gpupda...arge/160950.jpg
#6703
Posted 27 August 2010 - 19:40
What exactly are we looking for?
In this pic you can see the slot through the exhaust gases, "feeding" the first level of the diffuser.
Edited by jetalt, 27 August 2010 - 19:42.
#6704
Posted 28 August 2010 - 00:54
Interesting.....So it seems the rumours were true... 'new fuel' and more (lubricants?). Though they haven't tried them in FP1.
From FA's mouth after the FP1:
http://www.efectosue.../#comment-26582
#6705
Posted 28 August 2010 - 09:08
- On the new front wings test: "For the wings we are using here at Spa, we have not made any modifications, because they are okay. The high downforce front wing we have will require some small adjustments though."
- On the nes (Monza) floor test: "There is also a new requirement for the plank, which requires modifications for every car I believe. We had a slightly shorter plank [than the new minimum 1 metre length].
The offset load is a pretty severe load in that position, so all the teams that have got a single strut in the middle will have to do some changes. It is not only for a few teams – I think it is a change of all the specifications in F1."
#6706
Posted 28 August 2010 - 09:37
#6707
Posted 28 August 2010 - 09:42
#6708
Posted 28 August 2010 - 09:44
#6709
Posted 28 August 2010 - 09:45
#6710
Posted 28 August 2010 - 09:47
#6711
Posted 28 August 2010 - 09:54
They (at least Massa) still has one or two used race engines that haven't reached it's mileage yet. Spa is just a circuit you'd like to have a fresh engine forNew engines for both drivers, so 2 units must survive Saturdays and Sundays in Belgium, Italy, Singapore, Japan, Korea and Brazil, with possibility to use old motor in Abu Dhabi. I'm really worried about last GP in that case .
#6712
Posted 28 August 2010 - 10:06
#6713
Posted 28 August 2010 - 10:11
Not looking good. Hope it rains in Qualy.
Maybe it was just fuel, but it seems that Ferrari has a problem with softer compound. Alonso didn't improve on them, did he ??
#6714
Posted 28 August 2010 - 10:16
Him and Vettel improved. But not Hamilton and Webber.Maybe it was just fuel, but it seems that Ferrari has a problem with softer compound. Alonso didn't improve on them, did he ??
#6715
Posted 28 August 2010 - 10:27
#6716
Posted 28 August 2010 - 10:39
#6717
Posted 28 August 2010 - 10:44
Webber only did one run during FP3, on hards.Him and Vettel improved. But not Hamilton and Webber.
#6718
Posted 28 August 2010 - 10:47
#6719
Posted 28 August 2010 - 10:48
If he ran the soft tyres, that's the only tyre he used. He did only one run http://fia.com/en-GB...sion3-times.pdfnah, he did a few laps on softs as well. not looking too good compared to yesterday. they seemed to have migrated towards a lower DF set-up with the older wing package. maybe if it rains they will go back to a higher DF level and they will be more competative.
Advertisement
#6720
Posted 28 August 2010 - 10:51
#6721
Posted 28 August 2010 - 11:33
Edited by Mackey, 28 August 2010 - 11:34.
#6722
Posted 28 August 2010 - 13:07
#6723
Posted 28 August 2010 - 13:08
#6724
Posted 28 August 2010 - 13:08
Edited by gaston_foix, 28 August 2010 - 13:09.
#6725
Posted 28 August 2010 - 13:09
Why is so slow in the S1. What a ****ing strategy they cooked for Alonso?
Will be interesting to see the speed trap times and see if he was running more wing for a wet setup.
#6726
Posted 28 August 2010 - 13:11
So had Webbo in China and all were passing him...Alonso had a setup for wet i think
#6727
Posted 28 August 2010 - 13:14
Edited by GPmaster, 28 August 2010 - 13:15.
#6728
Posted 28 August 2010 - 13:15
Why is so slow in the S1. What a ****ing strategy they cooked for Alonso? If is not raining tomorrow what he will do? He will be a sitting duck for anyone in the longer straights...
It was raining at la source he prob just made a mistake. I think loosing the 3 element flex wing has really hurt the F10
#6729
Posted 28 August 2010 - 13:28
#6730
Posted 28 August 2010 - 13:30
2 Sebastian Vettel 14:47:58 307.8
13 Fernando Alonso 15:07:10 303.5
23 Jarno Trulli 14:10:27 288.5
http://www.formula1....speed_trap.html
So the difference is not as big as it's supposed to be, we need to wait for speed traps on sector lines to see what's going on.
#6731
Posted 28 August 2010 - 13:35
I only see this could work for Alonso if the race starts wet...but even if it does he´ll have to overtake lot of cars...and we know how difficult that is in the rain with the showers.
If it starts dry and then gets wet...well, he´ll be behind Massa so he´ll have to wait for a change of tyres.
I think they got it wrong here, they shouldn´t take risks with Alonso, if so they should do it with Massa, but not the big horse.
#6732
Posted 28 August 2010 - 13:36
Maybe, but I think he just messed up his first flying lap, hoping that he'd be able to improve later on, but changing conditions put paid to that.Alonso had a setup for wet i think
Praying for rain tomorrow, either way, as he seemed pretty happy in those conditions.
And a good start. He's 10th, which is prime position to get caught up in some melee.
Edited by Seanspeed, 28 August 2010 - 13:36.
#6733
Posted 28 August 2010 - 13:36
Edited by GPmaster, 28 August 2010 - 13:40.
#6734
Posted 28 August 2010 - 13:38
surely that would mean more wing for massa? do you have some pics? I think I understand it wronglywhen they were leaving the pits u could read Santander very easily on Massa while u barely could on Alonso.
#6735
Posted 28 August 2010 - 13:41
I thought he is regretting this stupid strategy...Adam Cooper on Twitter: "Just heard from Alonso, he regrets not going out on options straight away in Q3 but given that he's 10th he's pretty chilled"
#6736
Posted 28 August 2010 - 13:44
Thanks for the infoNew engines for both drivers, so 2 units must survive Saturdays and Sundays in Belgium, Italy, Singapore, Japan, Korea and Brazil, with possibility to use old motor in Abu Dhabi. I'm really worried about last GP in that case .
I really don't understand alonso's calculations.
He believed that he had a 50% prob to win the WDC... and said in to the worldwide press...
#6737
Posted 28 August 2010 - 13:49
#6738
Posted 28 August 2010 - 13:49
from forocoches
#6739
Posted 28 August 2010 - 13:49
From this point of view I understand him.
But tomorrow race will be very difficult. I don't have any expectations.
Advertisement
#6740
Posted 28 August 2010 - 13:50
Maybe, but I think he just messed up his first flying lap, hoping that he'd be able to improve later on, but changing conditions put paid to that.
Praying for rain tomorrow, either way, as he seemed pretty happy in those conditions.
And a good start. He's 10th, which is prime position to get caught up in some melee.
Exactly my thought. While I buy the whole wet setup excuse, it's not easy to forget about his 1st flying lap where he made a mistake that cost him 1+ second, with respect to Massa, Hamilton.
#6741
Posted 28 August 2010 - 13:53
from forocoches
But it can´t be the RW only, because Alonso would´ve been faster than Massa in S2. Maybe he´s running with more RH. But i agree it was an unnecesary risk.
#6742
Posted 28 August 2010 - 13:56
#6743
Posted 28 August 2010 - 14:01
It is for a part a drivers decision. It's not that the team said, Massa, you go for dry, Alonso, you go for wet. It's about what the drivers feel happy about. The team can advise but won't decide on their own.No matter what happens tomorrow, I think that Ferrari made a mistake to put Alonso on the riskier strategy, as he is the one with the best odds for the title. Thus, Massa should have been the one running with more DF on.
#6744
Posted 28 August 2010 - 14:02
Thats very true.It is for a part a drivers decision. It's not that the team said, Massa, you go for dry, Alonso, you go for wet. It's about what the drivers feel happy about. The team can advise but won't decide on their own.
Lets wait and see tomorrow. If it rains, Alonso may look like a genius. If it doesn't, he could well be in for a serious damage limitation exercise.
#6745
Posted 28 August 2010 - 14:02
It´s all so weird and messed up it´s still hard to believe.
#6746
Posted 28 August 2010 - 14:04
It is for a part a drivers decision. It's not that the team said, Massa, you go for dry, Alonso, you go for wet. It's about what the drivers feel happy about. The team can advise but won't decide on their own.
Well, if Alonso's strategy backfires tomorrow, he'll have only himself to blame. While I agree that is their calls, it seems a little risky not to emulate what the other contenders have done in terms of strategy.
Anyway, let's see tomorrow. We should have a great race.
#6747
Posted 28 August 2010 - 14:05
Thats very true.
Lets wait and see tomorrow. If it rains, Alonso may look like a genius. If it doesn't, he could well be in for a serious damage limitation exercise.
Even if it rains it´s going to be veeeeeeery difficult for him, the best chance he has is if the race starts wet, but still he´ll have 9 cars ahead to overtake, and that means almost 0 vissibility, by the 2nd or 3rd lap he could be like 15-16 seconds behind P1.
#6748
Posted 28 August 2010 - 14:08
Felipe 318.3
Fernando 316
S2:
Fernando 206.1
Felipe 203.1
S3:
Felipe 223.4
Fernando 222.3
That doesn't looks like big difference and surely with more wing Fernando should be much quicker than Felipe in S2 (who made mistake in second try), while it's only 1 tenth of a difference. Very puzzling for me .
#6749
Posted 28 August 2010 - 14:09
Never said he was good for a win, but if he can get up to maybe 4th or 5th, I'd say his championship chances will still be alive and well. If the race is crazy enough, a podium wouldn't be out of the question, either. Ya never know. Alonso is a canny racer, lets not forget. I'm very glad to have him in the team, as it was never nice not having confidence in your drivers from such situations as with Kimi and Massa(sorry Kimi.... ).Even if it rains it´s going to be veeeeeeery difficult for him, the best chance he has is if the race starts wet, but still he´ll have 9 cars ahead to overtake, and that means almost 0 vissibility, by the 2nd or 3rd lap he could be like 15-16 seconds behind P1.
#6750
Posted 28 August 2010 - 14:26