Fourms

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Rack and Pinion location, ...behind or in front of the front wheel centerline
meb58
post Nov 4 2009, 17:46
Post #1


Member
Posts: 163
Joined: May 09



Are there any pure performance benefits to locating the rack and pinion gear ahead of the front wheel center line? Feel for example? I know from experience that alignment relationships between camber and tow are more natural; more neg camber adds more toe out...perhaps this is natural to only me.

I imagine in today's world we worry about crashing and the cost of repairs when the rack is ahead of the front wheel centerline...and perhaps packaging.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Greg Locock
post Nov 4 2009, 22:41
Post #2


Member
Posts: 2,654
Joined: March 03



QUOTE (meb58 @ Nov 5 2009, 04:46) *
Are there any pure performance benefits to locating the rack and pinion gear ahead of the front wheel center line? Feel for example?


It is mostly driven by packaging. With FWD it is very hard to get the IS past the engine for a front mounted rack. Mounting racks in B cars and smaller is very tricky.

With a proper engine a front rack is doable, it allows you to drop the sump to the ground clearance line. In theory you can then mount the rack stiffly and soften off the lateral arm bushes to give some compliance understeer. In practice drivers hate that.

If we ever go to steer by wire with no column at all then I think front rack will become almost universal, just because of packaging.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
meb58
post Nov 5 2009, 15:59
Post #3


Member
Posts: 163
Joined: May 09



Steer by wire eek.gif ? I never saw that coming...aren't there some concerns about electronic failure?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
gruntguru
post Nov 5 2009, 22:55
Post #4


Member
Posts: 1,400
Joined: January 09



QUOTE (meb58 @ Nov 6 2009, 01:59) *
Steer by wire eek.gif ? I never saw that coming...aren't there some concerns about electronic failure?


I doubt Toyota will be first out of the blocks.


--------------------
"There is nothing more frightful than ignorance in action" Goethe.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
johnny yuma
post Nov 5 2009, 23:35
Post #5


Member
Posts: 364
Joined: May 07



QUOTE (gruntguru @ Nov 5 2009, 22:55) *
I doubt Toyota will be first out of the blocks.

It impresses me that most cars have had power steering and auto trans for 20 plus years,but because fuel injection and engine management systems are so good,people never seem to experience the almost impossibly heavy steering you get if your motor cuts out.If steer by wire arrives it would need to be,somehow,foolproof.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Greg Locock
post Nov 6 2009, 02:42
Post #6


Member
Posts: 2,654
Joined: March 03



QUOTE (johnny yuma @ Nov 6 2009, 10:35) *
If steer by wire arrives it would need to be,somehow,foolproof.

Because politicians and lawyers and the meeja are involved, yes. Of course in theory one would merely need to do a cost benefit analysis showing that on average society benefits from the elimination of the mechanical linkage. In less emotive industries that is precisely how safety/cost tradeoffs are done. However given that every single "tree jumped out at me" incident will be blamed on the steer by wire I am fairly sure that it'll be a while yet.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cheapracer
post Nov 6 2009, 06:57
Post #7


Member
Posts: 4,095
Joined: May 07



if a rack and control arms are solidly mounted then it only matters where the rack is relative to whatever travel radiuses are happening - comes down to planning. If however bushes are used then I would prefer a rear mounted rack as you are more likely to get toe in with deflection when hitting a bump mid corner.


--------------------
Proud Atlas F1 Forum member since 2000.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
gordmac
post Nov 6 2009, 09:51
Post #8


Member
Posts: 95
Joined: July 08



How would you get any feel in a steer by wire system?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
meb58
post Nov 6 2009, 13:02
Post #9


Member
Posts: 163
Joined: May 09



I agree, feel was one of my first concerns after system failure. But, assuming steer by wire were fool proof, we are but a small leap from cars that drive us to and fro sans our involvement...for better or worse.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kikiturbo2
post Nov 7 2009, 03:12
Post #10


Member
Posts: 129
Joined: December 04



QUOTE (meb58 @ Nov 6 2009, 14:02) *
I agree, feel was one of my first concerns after system failure. But, assuming steer by wire were fool proof, we are but a small leap from cars that drive us to and fro sans our involvement...for better or worse.



smile.gif exactly, I also wanted to point out that most modern steering systems with electric power steering are very poor on the steering feel front..


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tony Matthews
post Nov 7 2009, 09:41
Post #11


Member
Posts: 5,831
Joined: September 08



QUOTE (kikiturbo2 @ Nov 7 2009, 03:12) *
smile.gif exactly, I also wanted to point out that most modern steering systems with electric power steering are very poor on the steering feel front..

The Child Bride's Honda Civic has electric power steering, which seemed OK for the first short trundle or two. Now I've had the chance to fully assess it - I loath it. Very little feel, and despite it being a small, light car, tiring, as the constant small corrections you have to make in a straight line make my forearms ache after half an hour.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
saudoso
post Nov 7 2009, 11:17
Post #12


Member
Posts: 1,249
Joined: March 04



QUOTE (gordmac @ Nov 6 2009, 07:51) *
How would you get any feel in a steer by wire system?


Logitech has that figured out.

About reliability, much like hydraulic braking assistance. 2/3 of drivers wouldn't be able to stop a car if it failed. I happened to me once, and it was close. It just does not fail that usually.

But then again, why would someone fix what is working so well. Don't see it coming until cars handle themselves.

This post has been edited by saudoso: Nov 7 2009, 11:22


--------------------
Pat do you still not think that this is a bit early?
No, no it's going to be alright
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DaveW
post Nov 7 2009, 11:55
Post #13


Member
Posts: 132
Joined: January 09



QUOTE (meb58 @ Nov 5 2009, 15:59) *
Steer by wire eek.gif ? I never saw that coming...aren't there some concerns about electronic failure?

My not infallible memory suggests that Daimler Benz has used steer-by-wire for PSV's.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
McGuire
post Nov 7 2009, 12:48
Post #14


Member
Posts: 8,278
Joined: October 03



QUOTE (Greg Locock @ Nov 6 2009, 11:42) *
Because politicians and lawyers and the meeja are involved, yes. Of course in theory one would merely need to do a cost benefit analysis showing that on average society benefits from the elimination of the mechanical linkage. In less emotive industries that is precisely how safety/cost tradeoffs are done. However given that every single "tree jumped out at me" incident will be blamed on the steer by wire I am fairly sure that it'll be a while yet.


The auto industry is not competent enough to do fly-by-wire steering.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
gruntguru
post Nov 8 2009, 04:18
Post #15


Member
Posts: 1,400
Joined: January 09



QUOTE (Greg Locock @ Nov 6 2009, 12:42) *
Because politicians and lawyers and the meeja are involved, yes. Of course in theory one would merely need to do a cost benefit analysis showing that on average society benefits from the elimination of the mechanical linkage. In less emotive industries that is precisely how safety/cost tradeoffs are done. However given that every single "tree jumped out at me" incident will be blamed on the steer by wire I am fairly sure that it'll be a while yet.

QUOTE (McGuire @ Nov 7 2009, 22:48) *
The auto industry is not competent enough to do fly-by-wire steering.

The cost:benefit and risk:benefit ratios must be very big numbers at present and not dropping too fast either.


--------------------
"There is nothing more frightful than ignorance in action" Goethe.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Greg Locock
post Nov 8 2009, 06:16
Post #16


Member
Posts: 2,654
Joined: March 03



QUOTE
The auto industry is not competent enough to do fly-by-wire steering.

The cost:benefit and risk:benefit ratios must be very big numbers at present and not dropping too fast either.


Sort of agree, so far as maturity goes we can thank our friends in Germany who have at least twice in recent history have bamboozled the world while introducing active safety features - ESC on the A class was overkill, and their rigged demo of active braking wasn't very helpful either.

But imagine the benefit of no steering column on crash. And if we go to robot steering frankly why bother with a column? Maybe the aero would improve if you don't have to mount the engine so far 'above' the ground line? There are lots of possibilities.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DaveW
post Nov 8 2009, 11:07
Post #17


Member
Posts: 132
Joined: January 09



QUOTE (DaveW @ Nov 7 2009, 11:55) *
My not infallible memory suggests that Daimler Benz has used steer-by-wire for PSV's.

A quick search suggested my memory is fallible (perhaps fortunately). However, DB has worked on steer-by-wire, possibly starting in the 1980s, that resulted in several patents, see for example US6394218. Why PSV? I guess because of the compromises inherent in connecting a steering wheel located some way forward of the steered axle.

BTW, Lotus did build a programmable steer-by-wire research vehicle in 1985-ish complete with artificial feel. It incorporated manual reversion, however. In my experience, it was demonstrated most frequently with a steering gain of -1. Most drivers could adapt to gain reversal, except when they had to react instinctively.... Happened in a car park once, fortunately with damage only to the driver's pride.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
carlt
post Nov 8 2009, 11:31
Post #18


Member
Posts: 106
Joined: June 09



QUOTE (Tony Matthews @ Nov 7 2009, 09:41) *
The Child Bride's Honda Civic has electric power steering, which seemed OK for the first short trundle or two. Now I've had the chance to fully assess it - I loath it. Very little feel, and despite it being a small, light car, tiring, as the constant small corrections you have to make in a straight line make my forearms ache after half an hour.


by inference -

Child bride causes muscle decay in the forearms
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tony Matthews
post Nov 8 2009, 12:43
Post #19


Member
Posts: 5,831
Joined: September 08



QUOTE (carlt @ Nov 8 2009, 11:31) *
by inference -

Child bride causes muscle decay in the forearms

lol.gif Actually the reverse - if I drive it much longer I'll end up with arms like Popeye. I much prefer my Volkswagon Transporter.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cheapracer
post Nov 8 2009, 16:24
Post #20


Member
Posts: 4,095
Joined: May 07



QUOTE (Tony Matthews @ Nov 8 2009, 20:43) *
lol.gif Actually the reverse - if I drive it much longer I'll end up with arms like Popeye. I much prefer my Volkswagon Transporter.







--------------------
Proud Atlas F1 Forum member since 2000.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tony Matthews
post Nov 8 2009, 21:17
Post #21


Member
Posts: 5,831
Joined: September 08



If only... Although my son wants one more than I do.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Greg Locock
post Nov 8 2009, 21:59
Post #22


Member
Posts: 2,654
Joined: March 03



QUOTE (DaveW @ Nov 8 2009, 22:07) *
BTW, Lotus did build a programmable steer-by-wire research vehicle in 1985-ish complete with artificial feel. It incorporated manual reversion, however. In my experience, it was demonstrated most frequently with a steering gain of -1. Most drivers could adapt to gain reversal, except when they had to react instinctively.... Happened in a car park once, fortunately with damage only to the driver's pride.


Trilby? I happened to reread my notes on that a while back. The most reassuring noise was the clunk as the real steering column re-engaged.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
meb58
post Nov 9 2009, 13:21
Post #23


Member
Posts: 163
Joined: May 09



One of my chief complaints about Honda products...and I've put over 600,000 miles on some of those cars. 1" total toe in keeps more or less on track roflmao.gif

I am a little confused about compliance understeer Greg...do mean this be toe in in bump as cheapracer wrote? However, one seem like pure bushing complinace where the other is geometrically defined?

QUOTE (Tony Matthews @ Nov 7 2009, 06:41) *
The Child Bride's Honda Civic has electric power steering, which seemed OK for the first short trundle or two. Now I've had the chance to fully assess it - I loath it. Very little feel, and despite it being a small, light car, tiring, as the constant small corrections you have to make in a straight line make my forearms ache after half an hour.


This post has been edited by meb58: Nov 9 2009, 13:22
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Greg Locock
post Nov 9 2009, 20:14
Post #24


Member
Posts: 2,654
Joined: March 03



QUOTE (meb58 @ Nov 10 2009, 00:21) *
I am a little confused about compliance understeer Greg...do mean this be toe in in bump as cheapracer wrote? However, one seem like pure bushing complinace where the other is geometrically defined?


compliance steer is the way that the wheels steer (in degrees) per kN of lateral force. Due to pneumatic trail this force is actually applied a little behind the wheel centre, so the easiest thing is to apply the force below the wheel centre, to give deg/kN, and also measure the torsional stiffness about the vertical axis, deg/kNm. Then when you know your trail you can add these together appropriately to get an estimate of the compliance steer.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tony Matthews
post Nov 9 2009, 21:17
Post #25


Member
Posts: 5,831
Joined: September 08



QUOTE (meb58 @ Nov 9 2009, 13:21) *
1" total toe in keeps more or less on track roflmao.gif

Car or wife?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
meb58
post Nov 10 2009, 16:08
Post #26


Member
Posts: 163
Joined: May 09



I have to work on an answer...my wife is in line...it's the girl friend I have to worry about...


QUOTE (Tony Matthews @ Nov 9 2009, 18:17) *
Car or wife?

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tony Matthews
post Nov 10 2009, 17:09
Post #27


Member
Posts: 5,831
Joined: September 08



QUOTE (meb58 @ Nov 10 2009, 16:08) *
I have to work on an answer...my wife is in line...it's the girl friend I have to worry about...

Steer carefully or you'll be on the rack, pinioned too, probably.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
meb58
post Nov 11 2009, 13:49
Post #28


Member
Posts: 163
Joined: May 09



I am always careful...but being racked and pinioned may be, from a particular syntax perspective, a good thing...


QUOTE (Tony Matthews @ Nov 10 2009, 13:09) *
Steer carefully or you'll be on the rack, pinioned too, probably.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tony Matthews
post Nov 11 2009, 16:11
Post #29


Member
Posts: 5,831
Joined: September 08



One man's rack and pinion is another man's recirculating ball...


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
meb58
post Nov 11 2009, 17:19
Post #30


Member
Posts: 163
Joined: May 09



...well, the girl friend can do more with the recirculating ball for sure...but of course, as the steering changes so does the caster angle...


QUOTE (Tony Matthews @ Nov 11 2009, 13:11) *
One man's rack and pinion is another man's recirculating ball...

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 

Bulletin Board Rules Time is now: 20th November 2009 - 23:45