Williams 2012 - FW34 Renault
#901
Posted 07 February 2012 - 07:48
Advertisement
#902
Posted 07 February 2012 - 07:49
#903
Posted 07 February 2012 - 07:50
Complete new FW on FW34!!!
Actually, no.
#904
Posted 07 February 2012 - 07:53
#905
Posted 07 February 2012 - 07:54
Edited by Jambo, 07 February 2012 - 07:57.
#906
Posted 07 February 2012 - 07:54
#907
Posted 07 February 2012 - 07:55
Duct tape ?
Edited by DracoN, 07 February 2012 - 07:56.
#908
Posted 07 February 2012 - 07:56
BTW, where're ORIS and Thomson Reuters????
#909
Posted 07 February 2012 - 07:56
Scarbs already talking about rear suspension.
The tape is probably a lot of temp. sensors.
Edited by Jambo, 07 February 2012 - 07:57.
#910
Posted 07 February 2012 - 07:57
#911
Posted 07 February 2012 - 07:57
#913
Posted 07 February 2012 - 08:01
It was cross-add deal I guess as Procter&Gamble hold both Gillette and H&S trade marks.What's with the sudden influx of dandruff shampoo sponsorship in F1??
#914
Posted 07 February 2012 - 08:09
#915
Posted 07 February 2012 - 08:11
next thing we will see hair weaving clinics are sponsoring F1...What's with the sudden influx of dandruff shampoo sponsorship in F1??
#916
Posted 07 February 2012 - 08:12
#917
Posted 07 February 2012 - 08:15
Could do with a few more sponsors...
Imagine it without Senna and Pastors sponsors...
#918
Posted 07 February 2012 - 08:17
Then again it could look very different in OZ already.
Edited by Sevach, 07 February 2012 - 08:20.
#919
Posted 07 February 2012 - 08:18
Nice DRS.
BTW, where're ORIS and Thomson Reuters????
Good point, what about HATCH too?
#921
Posted 07 February 2012 - 08:21
#922
Posted 07 February 2012 - 08:22
#923
Posted 07 February 2012 - 08:23
Front suspension arm.
Good spot, couldn't drag my eyes away from the nose...
Looks quite tidy though
#924
Posted 07 February 2012 - 08:25
#925
Posted 07 February 2012 - 08:26
I'm a suspension noob, but at first glance, what Scarbs has drawn as the pull-rod, looks as if it's infront of the suspension arm in the photograph, versus the illustration?
EDIT: Wait hang on, it's not even the Williams
Edited by RoutariEnjinu, 07 February 2012 - 08:29.
#926
Posted 07 February 2012 - 08:36
#927
Posted 07 February 2012 - 08:36
A straight back shot would be better, but at the moment, i don't think the driveshafts are as inclined as last year.
#928
Posted 07 February 2012 - 08:38
A biut to sad to see Sam's heritage, but ... Hope it beats FI. As of Reno, not sure 'cause there Kimi angers the donkey!
#929
Posted 07 February 2012 - 08:39
The rear is a tiny as ever and those sidepods disappear into nothing making it look even smaller. Big undercuts as well.
There's really not a lot of her to cut through the air.
#930
Posted 07 February 2012 - 08:41
#931
Posted 07 February 2012 - 08:43
There's really not a lot of her to cut through the air.
Long ago I was told that rounded front works better when travelling air. The most referred to water drop shape. But you know I was wondering al the time, water drops falls towards gravity, for which most mass of water try to find its place as lowest position as possible, hence rounded front. When a car propelled to move forward, mass of this traveling object does not necessarily be placed at the front end as there is no gravity forcing it to be... So Yes, to ct long BS short, I am optimistic!
Edited by One, 07 February 2012 - 08:45.
#932
Posted 07 February 2012 - 08:46
If you see pics of the FW33 you will see the sidepods they're running now on the FW34 are exactly the same, I'm sure there will be a change.
Really at the rear end you have this big plate, I assume they wil be testing quite bits of exhaust.
#933
Posted 07 February 2012 - 08:46
Can Pastor and Bruno sit there for the entire season? Without the bump she looks great.
#934
Posted 07 February 2012 - 08:48
Long ago I was told that rounded front works better when travelling air. The most referred to water drop shape. But you know I was wondering al the time, water drops falls towards gravity, for which most mass of water try to find its place as lowest position as possible, hence rounded front. When a car propelled to move forward, mass of this traveling object does not necessarily be placed at the front end as there is no gravity forcing it to be... So Yes, to ct long BS short, I am optimistic!
I hate to break the illusion, but the classing water droplet shape is wrong. Air resistance flattens them.
#935
Posted 07 February 2012 - 08:49
#936
Posted 07 February 2012 - 08:50
If you see pics of the FW33 you will see the sidepods they're running now on the FW34 are exactly the same, I'm sure there will be a change.
Once they get some data on the cooling of the Renault they can optimise them, hopefully before the season starts.
It would be a good reference to compare the Cosworth cooling with the Renault, maybe that's why they have same/similar sidepods
#937
Posted 07 February 2012 - 08:52
Similar, but not quite the same IMOIf you see pics of the FW33 you will see the sidepods they're running now on the FW34 are exactly the same, I'm sure there will be a change.
#938
Posted 07 February 2012 - 08:55
Just look at that lump...
#939
Posted 07 February 2012 - 08:56
Advertisement
#940
Posted 07 February 2012 - 08:57
the nose step has "crack". look like "check mark" if viewed from side.
#941
Posted 07 February 2012 - 09:00
still quite inclined, but not sure as much as last year's or not. the drive shaft and lower wishbones are alomst same height now, more precisely wishbones are raised to make more clear space on the upper diffuser. not sure either if it was like that last year already or not.A straight back shot would be better, but at the moment, i don't think the driveshafts are as inclined as last year.
http://motorsport.ne...s-07fev/001.jpg
#942
Posted 07 February 2012 - 09:04
Imagine it without Senna and Pastors sponsors...
Yeah. William's are hanging on a thin thread. Former HRT and Virgin drivers are stark reminders of how quickly pay drivers can lose their backing. Pay drivers are not a sustainable medium for funding an F1 team. All their big name household sponsors are gone with only Reuters sticking around.
#943
Posted 07 February 2012 - 09:06
#944
Posted 07 February 2012 - 09:07
@muramasa
The driveshaft is still inclined but not as much, the gearbox seems slightly higher but slimmer
Still looking for that arse shot though lol
Edited by Sevach, 07 February 2012 - 09:08.
#945
Posted 07 February 2012 - 09:08
Is that the final livery though?Even with the bump, that car looks much better than last year's. No more faux Rothmans livery either. Good luck to them.
#946
Posted 07 February 2012 - 09:09
Normally the dark blue is only reserved for testing.
#947
Posted 07 February 2012 - 09:10
Is that the final livery though?
It comes across as one; if they run an interim livery then it tends to be entirely blue like that picture of the FW33 above.
#948
Posted 07 February 2012 - 09:11
Are we sure it's the final race livery?
Normally the dark blue is only reserved for testing.
I wouldn't mind that as the final livery, much better than a fake Rothmans one as already said.
Couple more sponsors wouldn't go amiss though
#949
Posted 07 February 2012 - 09:13
Similar, but not quite the same IMO
You need pictures from the same angle to compare, sidepods shape and inlets are the same of last year. But they've added a strange thing at the end of them. Trying to hide something?
#950
Posted 07 February 2012 - 09:13
It comes across as one; if they run an interim livery then it tends to be entirely blue like that picture of the FW33 above.
Pretty much this.
And i like it.
Should be even nicer on a sunny day as well.