Schumacher & Senna Brazil 2012 Incident [split]
#1
Posted 27 November 2011 - 16:17
Advertisement
#2
Posted 27 November 2011 - 16:18
#3
Posted 27 November 2011 - 16:19
#4
Posted 27 November 2011 - 16:20
#5
Posted 27 November 2011 - 16:20
Bruno hit him twice!!!
I am passed caring. He has no one to blame but himself for his stupid Saturday strategy. I say that as a fan.
#6
Posted 27 November 2011 - 16:23
He was having a moan at Schumacher whilst turning into the corner, with FOM providing a crappy angle, I'd say Bruno was at fault for the 2nd, the one which has destroyed Schumi's race, collision. Poor concentration.Bruno hit him twice!!!
Edited by DutchCruijff, 27 November 2011 - 16:31.
#7
Posted 27 November 2011 - 16:25
#8
Posted 27 November 2011 - 16:28
#9
Posted 27 November 2011 - 16:30
Schumacher turned in early, Senna was deep on the brakes. Racing incident.
It was a clear overtake. Ha was way ahead of Senna.
#10
Posted 27 November 2011 - 16:31
MS was clearly overtaking him ,leave him enough space.It was a clear overtake. Ha was way ahead of Senna.
#11
Posted 27 November 2011 - 16:36
It was a clear overtake. Ha was way ahead of Senna.
Clearly not, as they hit each other. Schumacher can squeeze but if the guy inside comes in hot, then you're asking for a crash and it happened. If Schumacher took a wider line, and Senna still hit him, then it would be clearly 100% Senna.
Edited by Disgrace, 27 November 2011 - 16:37.
#12
Posted 27 November 2011 - 16:38
I think you forget the first hit and you focus only on the second hit. First hit make MS car jump forward. Clearly MS race pace is not bad. Damn Bruno.Clearly not, as they hit each other. Schumacher can squeeze but if the guy inside comes in hot, then you're asking for a crash and it happened. If Schumacher took a wider line, and Senna still hit him, then it would be clearly 100% Senna.
Edited by ivand911, 27 November 2011 - 16:42.
#13
Posted 27 November 2011 - 16:44
Clearly not, as they hit each other. Schumacher can squeeze but if the guy inside comes in hot, then you're asking for a crash and it happened. If Schumacher took a wider line, and Senna still hit him, then it would be clearly 100% Senna.
It was a clear overtake but Bruno breaks too late...
#14
Posted 27 November 2011 - 17:37
Stupid Senna.
#15
Posted 27 November 2011 - 17:42
#16
Posted 27 November 2011 - 17:43
OMG. What Bruno thougt?
He quite clearly doesn't, as previous races have proved.
#17
Posted 27 November 2011 - 18:17
#18
Posted 27 November 2011 - 18:19
Didn't you watch the race?What's the stewards' decision over the incident?
#19
Posted 27 November 2011 - 18:22
I had visitors and it was on and off; drive through penalty escaped me. Sorry.Didn't you watch the race?
Advertisement
#20
Posted 27 November 2011 - 18:26
#21
Posted 27 November 2011 - 18:26
Yeah, every youngster there behaves like a bull on the arena when he sees MS near him.
Oh come on, the proverbial bully get's bullied and the fans whine?
#22
Posted 27 November 2011 - 18:27
#23
Posted 27 November 2011 - 18:30
#24
Posted 27 November 2011 - 18:31
#25
Posted 27 November 2011 - 18:32
#26
Posted 27 November 2011 - 18:34
2. contact: Senna's fault 100%
#27
Posted 27 November 2011 - 18:37
+1.1. contact: **** happens
2. contact: Senna's fault 100%
#28
Posted 27 November 2011 - 18:47
#29
Posted 27 November 2011 - 18:48
Yeah, every youngster there behaves like a bull on the arena when he sees MS near him.
Yeah, except this time the young bull was named Senna....can noone see the irony in this?
Senna got a drive thru, end of story.
#30
Posted 27 November 2011 - 18:53
I think MS may have squeezed a little early TBO taking Senna by surprise (and MS judging by the jink to the right) but the second hit should not have happened.
However, at the end of the day it is entirely Schumacher's fault for his shitty qualifying and crappy start putting him back there - I'm fairly certain he would admit that himself.
#31
Posted 27 November 2011 - 19:02
#32
Posted 27 November 2011 - 19:08
Also, MSC had a very similar thing happen to him at T1 in 2006 with Fisichella. video
Edited by wingwalker, 27 November 2011 - 20:53.
#33
Posted 27 November 2011 - 19:15
Penalties are kittyfying F1! Hate em.
#34
Posted 27 November 2011 - 19:23
1. contact: **** happens
2. contact: Senna's fault 100%
Yep.
Schumi was maybe unnecessarily aggressive with his early turn in, but Bruno should have been wise to it. Second contact was avoidable and unnecessary. Correct decision to penalise Senna.
#35
Posted 27 November 2011 - 19:39
#36
Posted 27 November 2011 - 20:31
#37
Posted 27 November 2011 - 20:31
#38
Posted 27 November 2011 - 20:42
Exactly1. contact: **** happens
2. contact: Senna's fault 100%
#39
Posted 27 November 2011 - 20:43
I think the signal will be , don't outbrake yourself and don't hit the guy who already overtake you. Why "no overtaking"? Sutil and Rosberg have similar moment ,but they didn't crash.When you're hard on the brakes into a turn, the speed you are carrying up the inside determines how tight a line you can hold. I would have thought that was obvious to a racing fan. So the first contact was pure racing incident and MS put himself at risk in the move. If we are going to attribute blame for such incidents and punish them then the signal we are giving is "no overtaking". OK I exaggerate but you get my point. The penalty I assume was for the way Bruno then monstered Michael's left rear which looked like anger and frustration.
Advertisement
#40
Posted 27 November 2011 - 20:50
When you're hard on the brakes into a turn, the speed you are carrying up the inside determines how tight a line you can hold. I would have thought that was obvious to a racing fan. So the first contact was pure racing incident and MS put himself at risk in the move. If we are going to attribute blame for such incidents and punish them then the signal we are giving is "no overtaking". OK I exaggerate but you get my point. The penalty I assume was for the way Bruno then monstered Michael's left rear which looked like anger and frustration.
I agree
#41
Posted 27 November 2011 - 20:55
I'm about as dye-in-the-wool when it comes to MSC as it gets, but it wasn't really deserving of a penalty for either. Both a bit careless really. One thing lead to the other, singling Senna out was a tad unfair.
#42
Posted 27 November 2011 - 22:12
#43
Posted 27 November 2011 - 22:17
In MSC vs Senna case, MSC passes Senna, Senna outbrakes himself, MSC does not leave a space, collision.
both at fault, ie, a racing accident. no one to blame. Yet another blunder by the stewards.
#44
Posted 27 November 2011 - 22:24
#45
Posted 27 November 2011 - 22:33
Indeed.I thought it was clear cut, Michael was ahead, Bruno outbraked himself and stuck his hand up instead of focussing on correcting the car and hit him again. Totally avoidable, especially when you saw the space he had on his side.
Rightful decision by the stewards.
#46
Posted 27 November 2011 - 22:49
#47
Posted 27 November 2011 - 23:06
Incorrect. Rosberg braked later and got back fully alongside.. Senna just nerfed into the side of Schumacher while behind. these are wholly different things.It was a racing accident, for comparison look at Rosberg Sutil "near overtake", Sutil passes Rosberg, Rosberg brakes later, Sutil leaves room, both drive off without an accident.
In MSC vs Senna case, MSC passes Senna, Senna outbrakes himself, MSC does not leave a space, collision.
#48
Posted 27 November 2011 - 23:17
Alternatively, drivers like Senna should be send for next five races to the back of grid until he learns how to drive. He can share his new position with Hamilton parking nearby.First hit, racing incident. Second hit, Bruno's fault. This is why he needs to qualify higher.
Edited by Sakae, 27 November 2011 - 23:17.
#49
Posted 28 November 2011 - 01:51
bruno failed to take the opportunity and use more of the track. the second contact was sheer petulance
#50
Posted 28 November 2011 - 02:31
Not going to happen