1. Vettel - Webber the best pairing. Showed in 2010 just how close they are in pace and they are getting every bit of pace out of their car2. Alonso - Massa . Second best. Alonso is the best driver on the grid and Massa can be good too. Massa Matched Hamilton in an inferior car...
3. Shumacher - Rosberg. 3rd best. Rosberg is quick and consistent and if Schumi gets a good car again i think people will see he really hasnt lost much.
4. Vergne - Ricciardo. Ultra talented guys who are the future of the sport. Probably both future WDC's
5. Hamilton - Button. Both overrated. Had great cars in 2010 and 2011 that should have resulted in at least 1 Championship. People forget how useless Button could be in 2010 and 2009, And Hamilton has always been overated as shown by a disaster in 2011
1. That's just undiluted Vettel bias of a massive order - how anyone could say 'they' are getting every bit of pace out of their car is such an obvious attempt to make Vettel look like a God, when everyone knows that whilst Vettel was immense in 2011, Webber seriously underperformed.
2. You have a seriously warped perception of what cars everyone is driving in. On balance, the Ferrari was the class of the field in 2008, they outpaced McLaren many more times than McLaren outpaced them and thumped them in the constructors championship.
3. Nonsense - McLaren had on balance the 3rd best car in 2010, and clear 2nd best in 2011, and the driver pairing yielded consecutive 2nd places in the constructors championship and 11 victories. Not that bad, and certainly not behind Vergne and Ricciardo
Why don't you put the great grandsons of Vettel and Schumacher in 2106 AD in the list too by that logic?