Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: New rules likely to spread out field in 2009
The AUTOSPORT Bulletin Board > Forums > Racing Comments
D.M.N.
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/69774

The significant changes to Formula One's technical regulations are likely to create a far greater spread in performance between teams next year, according to some of the sport's leading figures.

This season has been one of the closest ever, with the gap between the pace of the first and last cars usually around two seconds per lap in race conditions - a dramatic improvement from even five years ago, when it was nearer four seconds.

The stability of the regulations in the last three seasons has allowed the lesser-funded teams to catch up, as those at the front find there are only minor improvements to be made three years into the development cycle.

The regulations have remained largely untouched since the introduction of 2.4-litre V8 engines after the 2005 season, while the switch to a sole tyre supplier after 2006 allowed the gap to close further.

Force India technical director Mike Gascoyne says the consistency of the rules has allowed teams such as his to make huge strides.

"We've had pretty stable rules for the past few years and that is exactly what has happened," he told this week's Autosport. "There are still those doing a better job, but in the midfield group there are times when you have half a second from seventh to 20th, it's incredibly close.

"If you compare qualifying this year to last year, across all the teams, the average improvement is 0.2 seconds, whereas we're more like 1.4 seconds.

"McLaren and Ferrari are still at the front, but they are generally the teams that have made the least improvement, so you would say those improvements are getting harder to find."

But with regulation changes coming into force in 2009, including KERS systems and a reduction in aerodynamic devices, there will be a much greater window for improvement and teams with greater resources develop at a faster rate.

Although most midfield teams are optimistic of taking a significant step forward, the spread at the season opener in Australia is likely to be far greater than it was this year.

Red Bull Racing's Mark Webber predicts that the new regulations will have a detrimental affect on the spectacle at first.

"The racing hasn't been too bad this year," he told Autosport. "My opinion is that next year it will be much more spread out because people will be getting used to the rules.

"It won't be as good in the short term. Whenever you change the rules, some people get it right and some people get it wrong."


I hope it doesn't spread the field out too much. I don't think I'm alone when saying that we've some pretty good racing this season compared to previous seasons.
Atreiu
I really don't know what to expect for next year. With KERS and all, maybe reliability will go down the drain and return to late 90s rate.
Clatter
Well no shock there then.

The big teams are usually the ones who adapt the quickest, and the bigger the changes the greater their advantage.
SeanValen
Big changes take some time, patience as usual will rewards us.

"It is important to remain calm." Schumacher-Imola 2006
repcobrabham
Originally posted by Clatter
Well no shock there then.


with KERS? interesting choice of words ;)
undersquare
I'm hoping it will provide an opportunity for one or more of the midfield teams to break into the top echelon. That's my optimistic side.

On my pessimistic side I can see McLaren pulling ahead of Ferrari and there being no contest at the top.
Man of the race
If Ferrari and McLaren will not be on the top again, I would call it "an artifically balanced situation".
Alfisti
Originally posted by SeanValen
Big changes take some time, patience as usual will rewards us.

"It is important to remain calm." Schumacher-Imola 2006


Here is a challengwe for you, one week without mentioning Schumacher.
race addicted
I'm prepared for something like Melbourne '98 once again. One or two teams well ahead.
the9th
Gascoyne is whining already. He would do it either way. Should focus on his job (whatever that is). F***ing politics. I hope they fire the guy now. tongue.gif Teams should try and see this as a new window of opportunity. If you can't compete, go back to India and may the force be with you! Bring back the costumer teams. Oh, and Funk you Frank!...
Learn how to cheat, Mike! Ask Ferrari for advise, you're just one more of their pawns!
Period. smoking.gif
Motormedia
Spreading out the field... what is the consequence of that? It sure doesn't make Toro Rosso more attractive on the market, does it? 18 cars on the grid for 2010 and a more spread out field - something must be done if the sport is not going to lose even more market shares against other sports.

Motormedia
bankoq
Originally posted by undersquare
In my pessimistic side I can see McLaren pulling ahead of Ferrari and there being no contest at the top.


I see it very similarly. It seems McLaren is clearly the most developed team on the technical side (e.g. their simulator). It will be sad if one team has car 1s faster than anyone else after 2 such close seasons.
OfficeLinebacker
Originally posted by Clatter
Well no shock there then.

EDIT: someone already made the same joke, worded even better.

I think it would be OK to see one team dominate, as long as it was only for a race or two.

That would increase more the suspense leading up to each race.

However I don't think there's any way to create that type of athmosphere other than by changing the rules race-by-race for example by doing weight penalties.
Scorg
Originally posted by the9th
Gascoyne is whining already. He would do it either way. Should focus on his job (whatever that is). F***ing politics. I hope they fire the guy now. tongue.gif Teams should try and see this as a new window of opportunity. If you can't compete, go back to India and may the force be with you! Bring back the costumer teams. Oh, and Funk you Frank!...
Learn how to cheat, Mike! Ask Ferrari for advise, you're just one more of their pawns!
Period. smoking.gif


I wouldnt worry too much about Mike, he was asked for a soundbite and he gave one, otherwise F-I are looking at this as an opportunity.
the9th
I was kind of joking. I hope they are, though!
Risil
Maybe not though. Engines are still frozen, single tyre formula, and now bodywork specs have been virtually standardised? Unless anyone finds a workaround in the rules, or figures out a way to make the KERS actually work, we could also see some very close competition.

At any rate, at least Red Bull and Toro Rosso should be close.
Mauseri
I wonder what kind of effect kers will have. I'd think there will not be much advantage gained or losed directly with it, but the complications to balance could be a key. Also the aero rules will have some effect for sure, but simpler aero should be easier to figure out fast...
Kooper
"It is important to remain calm." Schumacher-Jerez 1997
beanoid
Originally posted by the9th
Bring back the costumer teams.


Yes, I just love it when they wear those little masks.
SeanValen
Originally posted by Alfisti


Here is a challengwe for you, one week without mentioning Schumacher.





As long as two teams are strong, 2009 should be aliright, the key is what seat will Alonso be in? If you got him in a competitive car, it's gonna be better, because in 2007 we had Alonso and Hamilton at Mclaren, we enjoyed something we don't normally get, and that is lacking in 2008.

Maybe one team will surprise like Honda or BMW.

Of cource if a Ferrari driver is failing to achieve certain results, there should be no delay in getting Schumacher to check the car out and perhaps drive a GP, it would be the moment of the year.
sopa
Originally posted by Alfisti


Here is a challengwe for you, one week without mentioning Schumacher.


Will he use word 'Schumacher' in every sentence also in the year 2030?smile.gif
the9th
Originally posted by beanoid


Yes, I just love it when they wear those little masks.

Yes, those are fine, although I don't really know what you mean.
Anyway, the customer chassis looked like a nice prospect when you realize there's little shifting going on in the stiff hierarchy that is Formula 1, from the bottom of the pit to skyward and going holy Bernie (although it's tighter now!).
Yes I know that Sauber can go on a shivering roller coaster ride from as high as 3rd to 5th or 4th in the course of a decade, if my lazy perception doesn't trick me. That is all dandy, but racing should be about winning. Unfortunatelly, for the fans I guess, this sport has been turning itself into a narcoleptic show, a tv show, a parade for losers, some sort of a windowshop for the manufacturers, sponsors, you name it. As long as everyone is happy that way and their business is good, ride along. I mean, Fisichella would extend his deal with Force India through another 5 years, even if he knew they'd be stuck at the back of the line for that little while. And why? Because it's good for his business, lots of media attention, lot's of hype, keeps the cash flowing. As long as he can compete with his team mate, it's a great deal. Good for the team too, in some way, to have such a high profile driver...
As for me, as a fan, I can't say that I'm happy. cry.gif
I don't mind if the new rules will spread out the field, in fact I'd love to see the worst teams suck - please don't take that away from the fans! But if we're waiting for another five years for them to copy properly what the best teams are doing (since copying is cheaper) then why wait? Bring the customer chassis back now.
I know it's hard on the brain so nevermind... It'll be OK...

Edit: Ok, a customer is not necessarilly a costumer... wink.gif
Mauseri
Originally posted by sopa


Will he use word 'Schumacher' in every sentence also in the year 2030?smile.gif

For sure, except if Alonso or someone has passed all Schu's records lol.gif
beanoid
Originally posted by the9th
Edit: Ok, a customer is not necessarilly a costumer... wink.gif


Sorry, I'm an English teacher, and sometimes I just can't help myself. wink.gif
Lazy Prodigy
With PDLR comment about having to be 2 seconds(or something close to that) faster to overtake I wouldn't mind seeing it get spread out again.
wingwalker
I hope the field will not only be spread out more (which might and might not be a good thing), but the teams will loose/gain a lot more coming from track to track. These days teams have a solid setup even before start of FP1 and unless something goes wrong they now where they stand. In 2009 cars will be unknown to the teams (compared to now) so I guess we will see more of missed setups and simply cars being a lot quicker on certian trakcs - 2008 cars have years of "how to make them stronger on the tracks they suck on" work in them, which is natural with little change of regulations. 2009 might be different, and I hope it will be.
Perigee
Originally posted by micra_k10

For sure, except if Alonso or someone has passed all Schu's records lol.gif

I can't help but admire unbridled optimism in the face of all reason smile.gif
pingu666
i hope it varies abit more, throughout the field

we might see some interesting kers useage too, like not fit it in qualy but use it in the race

kers will also vary the speed of the car alot over a lap...
Tenmantaylor
Are we going to see a return to the 60s in terms of driver safety with battery electrocutions and fires in place of fuel/magnesium fires?
Mauseri
Originally posted by Tenmantaylor
Are we going to see a return to the 60s in terms of driver safety with battery electrocutions and fires in place of fuel/magnesium fires?

Or fly-wheels spinning to grand stands :\

It will be interesting to see how Williams plans unfold.
Jimages
New regulations, or at least a change in the regulations more often than not causes there to be a wider spread of performance through out the field. Personally I think we can't expect a close midfield next year.

I'd also expect there to be one team who dominate in terms of performance, probably either McLaren or Ferrari, but the stronger will be pegged back over the course of the year.

I don't really see the regulations producing a big shake up, not at all really. I don't see Honda suddenly becoming winners, although if they make a step forward it would be more down to Ross Brawn's method of working starting to show through.

Force India are unlikely to suddenly become regular points scorers or podium contenders, although if they produce a quick and tidy car out of the box they could grab a couple of early giant killing results, but they'd slip behind the pack as usual as the season wore on.

But to me the big question is can McLaren or Ferrari turn up at Melbourne with the kind of car performance advantage enjoyed by McLaren in 1998? Probably not, not five seconds a lap but I could see a one of them having a one second plus advantage.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2012 Invision Power Services, Inc.