Lewis has made too many "tricky" moves since he's driving in f1, this decision is not so outrageos as many can think.
Originally posted by Insane111
Is there any way to contact the FIA by email?
I wouldn't mind telling them what I think of them.
Don't waste your breathe their email server bounces you out as spam

I tried emailing them once before.
Only Massa
Sep 7 2008, 16:21
and this once great forum keeps being flooded by unfair McLaren supporters.
Reality check: the world out there is different and can see things in a non-biased way.
It was a blatant case of bad and unfair driving.
It's simply stupid comparing this to the well-fought (but correct, to the limit) battle between Massa and Kubica.
Keep in mind the difference between two fair drivers and a too-immature driver lacking strategic intelligence.
stevvy1986
Sep 7 2008, 16:21
dont like hamilton,but thats EXTREMELY harsh,he gave the place back,the only thing i can think of is they thought he had an advantage from it heading into turn 1 and being able to pass Kimi
niallmckiernan
Sep 7 2008, 16:21
im looking forward to monza ;)
Slowinfastout
Sep 7 2008, 16:21
The old farts are just after cheap controversy... they don't care one bit about racing.
What a disgrace!
steelyman
Sep 7 2008, 16:21
justice done. if this were earlier in the race he would have got the drive thru then instead of after. and if it were another driver, no one would say anything about it.
if you have raced, its pretty obvious. if you sit on your couch and watch racing its may not be. the people that make these decisions have more info and knowledge than the people that cry on this board.
let the whining commence.
Well, had Hamilton not cut the chicane, he wouldn't have been able to get past Kimi in the hairpin.
Fact: Hamilton benefited from cutting the chicane.
Another fact: You get drive-through penalty for doing that.
And a 3rd fact: If that happens in the final laps of the race, you get a time penalty.
Originally posted by Jamelon
It is a fair decision. The same that has been taken in equivalent situations in the past.
Sorry fanboys, this is called objectivity.
I couldn't care less who wins, objectivity is in the eye of the beholder. The FIA is Ferrari biased, this is the last straw. They make NASCAR look neutral. Last time I get up to watch a race, Max and his band of idiots can rot in hell.
Originally posted by Beyond
Lewis has made too many "tricky" moves since he's driving in f1, this decision is not so outrageos as many can think.
+1
Slowinfastout
Sep 7 2008, 16:22
The old farts are just after cheap controversy... they don't care one bit about racing..
What a disgrace!
HoldenRT
Sep 7 2008, 16:22
Originally posted by Chris Glass
I dont even understand what he did wrong? Cars often cut chicanes and just give position back? The corrupt nature of this penatly is hard to hide its quite blatant even for the FIA who we all know are no better than the mafia. Great for the Wc though.
I think it's simple.. if he didn't cut the chicane he wouldn't of been right on Kimi's tail in the position to overtake. He would of been .5 back and would of needed to slipstream after Eau Rogue.
WDC1992
Sep 7 2008, 16:22
Lazy Prodigy
Sep 7 2008, 16:23
This is as bad as 2007 WCC case
Zarathustra
Sep 7 2008, 16:23
Well I guess it's to be another Ferrari year then. I won't be watching another farce next weekend.
pingu666
Sep 7 2008, 16:23
well even if you say he shouldnt of passed him at the hairpin, kimi did get past later in the lap thanks to the williams, but spun right after..
i just cant see the reason for it, massa didnt deserve the win today, he drove well for sure, but...
Great masterstroke by Bernie ;) now everyone will talk F1 and the season got more interesting.
Damn, a penalty?!
giacomo
Sep 7 2008, 16:24
I support Felipe Massa and would like to see him winning the 2008 WDC - but this decision is a shame and a disgrace.
inca_roads
Sep 7 2008, 16:24
Originally posted by Only Massa
and this once great forum keeps being flooded by unfair McLaren supporters.
Reality check: the world out there is different and can see things in a non-biased way.
It was a blatant case of bad and unfair driving.
It's simply stupid comparing this to the well-fought (but correct, to the limit) battle between Massa and Kubica.
Keep in mind the difference between two fair drivers and a too-immature driver lacking strategic intelligence.
I suggest you watch the Mass-Kubica battle again, and then come back and tell me how many times they cut corners and used run-off areas.
Marcel Schot
Sep 7 2008, 16:24
Most stupid decision in F1 history
Anomander
Sep 7 2008, 16:24
Originally posted by TailG
Well, had Hamilton not cut the chicane, he wouldn't have been able to get past Kimi in the hairpin.
Fact: Hamilton benefited from cutting the chicane.
Another fact: You get drive-through penalty for doing that.
And a 3rd fact: If that happens in the final laps of the race, you get a time penalty.
Fact: Ferrari do anything no penalty
McLaren: Penalty
How do FIA dare after Massa slapped wrist two weeks ago
Dmitriy_Guller
Sep 7 2008, 16:24
Formula 1 never fails to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. The big wigs just can't leave the racing alone, they want to feel important and turn the sport into a court drama.
EvilPhil II
Sep 7 2008, 16:24
Ah fuck it. If this isn’t over turned I am turning my back on F1 finally for good. Its taken me 6 months to start watching it again after last season and I am not wasting my time watching the Max Mosley willy waving completion for another season. I am fucking sick of this
Tigershark
Sep 7 2008, 16:24
As a Ferrari supporter, I'm somewhat disappointed by this decision.
But perhaps this will lead to those in power taking a second look at all the tarmac run-off.
Sorry. Disgusted.
The chicane incident gave Hamilton no advantage.
Watch it. He was alongside on KR's left as they crossed the line.
KR pulled clear and LH passed on KR's right.
No "momentum" possible.
And given KR's car positioning no option but to cut the chicane apex.
The chicane approach move was clever, inviting KR onto the wet line, but KR didn't go straight through...
I did wonder rather whether there were (or should have been) yellows where the Williams pulled directly across the scrapping KR + LH.
I really think decisions like this "bring the sport into disrepute".
And after the GP2 drivethroughs but the Ferarri whitewash, there's a lot of disrepute.
DriveFastLiveSlow
Sep 7 2008, 16:24
Originally posted by Nukle
+1
+1
Now, hopefully Kimi is able to help Felipe for WDC.
HoldenRT
Sep 7 2008, 16:25
And people want Jean Todt to be Max's successor.
Originally posted by Beyond
Lewis has made too many "tricky" moves since he's driving in f1, this decision is not so outrageos as many can think.
The problem is I think that there is a general feeling that the FIA is not too fond of McLaren, is fond of Ferrari and likes close world championships ..something this decision has done nothing to undermine.
Regards
Andy
wrighty
Sep 7 2008, 16:25
that is the most utterly biased, bent, corrupt decision i've ever seen, i'm fuckin disgusted.
COMPLETE BOLLOCKS!!!
boydy87
Sep 7 2008, 16:25
Shocking decision, absolutely shocking. The worst and most baffling decision in sporting history. Any incidint involvling mclaren these days is an automatic fine, ban, punishment, whatever.
Insane111
Sep 7 2008, 16:25
Originally posted by Chiara
Don't waste your breathe their email server bounces you out as spam
I tried emailing them once before.
I expect you're correct, dictatorships work in that way I guess.
Dragonfly
Sep 7 2008, 16:25
This is nor good. This is really BAD.
FIA
I am a Raikkonen supporter and indirectly a Ferrari one but can't find a justification for such a decision. They were fighting for God's sake and under heavy conditions.
I think the penalty was deserved: he clearly took advantage from cutting the chicane.
ensign14
Sep 7 2008, 16:26
Let's look at the facts.
Hamilton tried to get past Raikkonen. He got ahead but missed out the chicane. He therefore let Raikkonen back past. Ron Dennis asked Charlie Whiting is that was in order and Whiting said yes.
Hamilton then overtook Raikkonen.
The stewards did not take any action during the race so there was no chance that any penalty could be sorted during the race. And Whiting did not say "let him past again" which Hamilton could have done.
Hamilton won the race.
Ferrari then protested.
The stewards then decided to add time to Hamilton to ensure he did not win.
Sorry, but this is more bullshit than the entire output of the genus Bos for the past thirty million years if they all had had continuous diarrhoea.
Originally posted by DriveFastLiveSlow
+1
Now, hopefully Kimi is able to help Felipe for WDC.
Now hopefully both Ferrari's detonate at the next GP.
Love those smokescreens they pull.
EvilPhil II
Sep 7 2008, 16:26
Assuming that when Rosberg/Nakajima went off the road that there were yellow flags out... and that Kimi overtook Lewis for the lead on that corner is Kimi going to be given a grid penalty next race?
DoubleWDC
Sep 7 2008, 16:26
Originally posted by TailG
Well, had Hamilton not cut the chicane, he wouldn't have been able to get past Kimi in the hairpin.
Fact: Hamilton benefited from cutting the chicane.
Another fact: You get drive-through penalty for doing that.
And a 3rd fact: If that happens in the final laps of the race, you get a time penalty.
Yep that's the story cut short. If LH had not cut the chicane he would have been nowhere near him at the straight.
Originally posted by ilfulo
I think the penalty was deserved: he clearly took advantage from cutting the chicane.
Like here?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-5UnPeyzcHM
Originally posted by ensign14
OK, fuck you FIA. Fuck you, Max, you fucking cunt. Fuck you Ferrari you cheating bastards.
You can't blame Ferrari. The stewards started investigation on their own (?), and in any case, all teams look to maximize their points.
FIA stewards and penalty system needs work. Fix it for GP2 as well. :\
The penalty doesn't fit the crime, it was tough racing and probably over the limit but a 25second penalty is too much, a grid penalty for the next race would have been more reasoneable.
PS:and we yet have to see if Heidfeld is penalized
Originally posted by Beyond
Lewis has made too many "tricky" moves since he's driving in f1, this decision is not so outrageos as many can think.
Personally I don't agree with this penalty, but I DO agree with the above statement.
And listening to Lewis complaining in the press conference that he was pushed off by Kimi, that there wasn't enough room.
I think the good Lewis should go home and look at EVERY SINGLE PASS he, himself has made down the inside into a corner. He runs people wide more often than Montoya used to do, and he did it A LOT!
Jamelon
Sep 7 2008, 16:27
Hamo should have waited two more corners, he would have overtaken Kimi's poor handling Ferrari easily before the first chicane. It was exciting to watch but against the rules, he gained an advantage, that's the bottom line.
Originally posted by primer
You can't blame Ferrari. The stewards started investigation on their own (?), and in any case, all teams look to maximize their points.
FIA stewards and penalty system needs work. Fix it for GP2 as well. :\
Ferrari lodged the complaint what I read.
Originally posted by wdh
Sorry. Disgusted.
The chicane incident gave Hamilton no advantage.
BS, watch it again.
Hamilton got a much better acceleration on the straight because he drove through the chicane.
Originally posted by TailG
Well, had Hamilton not cut the chicane, he wouldn't have been able to get past Kimi in the hairpin.
Fact: Hamilton benefited from cutting the chicane.
Another fact: You get drive-through penalty for doing that.
And a 3rd fact: If that happens in the final laps of the race, you get a time penalty.
Precisely so.
This forum should be renamed "Mclaren Fanboys"...
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.