Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Forum upgrade
The AUTOSPORT Bulletin Board > Forums > Website Feedback
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
mahelgel
I think the layout in general is pretty much ok, and if the speed is improved its all for the good (as i'm on an old laptop at the moment, everything is slow and sluggish, but thats the lack cpu and ram, not the forum tongue.gif )...

But, there are a few minor irritations when sorting out what threads that are new, or where there have been activity since the last time i visited. I do know there are "color codes" for checking the activity, but the old system was very simple and effective, more so imho than the new system...

Also, do please bring back the big dot to mark the threads you have been posting in smile.gif

Zmeej
malhegel up.gif up.gif up.gif
QUOTE
there are a few ... irritations when sorting out what threads that are new, or where there have been activity since the last time i visited. I do know there are "color codes" for checking the activity, but the old system was very simple and effective, more so imho than the new system...

Also, do please bring back the big dot to mark the threads you have been posting in. smile.gif

Edited to reflect my view that there are QUITE a few irritations (very politely put) and that they ain't minor. cool.gif




I know, I know... Just think of my whinging as a form of talk therapy... rolleyes.gif
Breadmaster
QUOTE (Hack @ May 1 2009, 13:42) *
Unfortunately, yes. The thread subscription data couldn't be transferred.


nevermind!

i'll just have to be more active on the forum instead of being lazy and sitting back, expecting stuff to come to me! up.gif
Hack
QUOTE (Jackman @ Apr 30 2009, 16:45) *
It doesn't seem to be working with my.autosport.com yet - any idea when that will happen?


Basic My Autosport functionality is now back, although there are a few minor snags to sort out.
turin
QUOTE (Hack @ May 1 2009, 08:29) *
I'm working on My Autosport integration at the moment. Fixing it is not as simple as I'd hoped. ambivalent.gif




you fixed it! thanks HackĀ  up.gif


le chat noir
can we have the dates and times back for when a thread was started please?
Ivan
QUOTE (Bouncing Pink Ball @ Apr 30 2009, 16:35) *
I know the flickering and cutting off have been mentioned, but the longer member names are causing odd realignments to the entire row when moused over in Firefox 3.0.10. They don't fit the drop down they're squeezed into. Also, all the above happens only when I mouse over the name from above or below, not if I direct the pointer toward either from the left to the icon or from the right to where the drop down arrow would appear.

Edited to correct: The resizing still happens no matter how I mouse in, just no flickering. Of course, the cutoff is constant. smile.gif

Are you saying this is an Firefox issue...if so how did you stop the flickering?
Ivan
Hack,
This may have been mentioned before but, I just noticed it. I was just in a thread with a long title...
The - The AUTOSPORT Bulletin Board> Forums> etc stretched all the way across and blocked Calender, Members, etc so that you can't click on those.
Ali_G
QUOTE (le chat noir @ May 1 2009, 17:07) *
can we have the dates and times back for when a thread was started please?


Would like also if possible.
jonpollak
Will this spanking new layout instantly ban these idiots who now inhabit my lovely sandbox?

NO?.. I was afraid not.

I do like it though.

Jp

PS....What's up with these "star ratings"?.... I am guessing it's based on quantity rather than quality?
Raziel
Nice job AS up.gif
Option1
So Zmeej will be happy - I've found something I don't like.

I REALLY do NOT like having images I post resized to 500px max width. Completely unacceptable. No forum software resize gives acceptable quality. It saves not a single jot of bandwidth for anyone. It's completely unnecessary.

Please fix.

Neil
Hack
QUOTE (Option1 @ May 1 2009, 19:51) *
I REALLY do NOT like having images I post resized to 500px max width.


This was on by default. I can't find an easy way to set the sizes, so I've turned it off. Let's see how things work without it.
Option1
Hack, you're a fine upstanding gentleman! biggrin.gif

Besides, no image size limit was the way the old forum worked I believe.

thanks again,
Neil
Dragonfly
Hack
if you want to have a readable, meaningful and friendly BB where the contents is what really matters
- keep directly posted images resized
- encourage posting links instead of images
- avatars may become a bit larger but not unlimited
- limit the signature area

This is based on my personal experience and with my good intentions to be helpful.

Also this is what appears on the top with Mozilla Firefox - two rows override.


On many IPB boards in the marked area there is a line (command) "Mark all forums as read". Very useful if one wants to see the new posts after the last visit. The old platform did this automatically.
noikeee
QUOTE (Option1 @ May 1 2009, 19:51) *
So Zmeej will be happy - I've found something I don't like.

I REALLY do NOT like having images I post resized to 500px max width. Completely unacceptable. No forum software resize gives acceptable quality. It saves not a single jot of bandwidth for anyone. It's completely unnecessary.

Please fix.

Neil


It is necessary, for people with lower resolutions so that it doesn't ruin the layout of the page. Has worked fine for ages in another forum I go in.

The limit usually is 800x600.
mach4
QUOTE (Option1 @ May 1 2009, 14:51) *
So Zmeej will be happy - I've found something I don't like.

I REALLY do NOT like having images I post resized to 500px max width. Completely unacceptable. No forum software resize gives acceptable quality. It saves not a single jot of bandwidth for anyone. It's completely unnecessary.

Please fix.

Neil


I thought it was much better with the resizing... you could very easily click on the black bar on top of the image and it would pop-up the full size
Gilles4Ever
QUOTE (Option1 @ May 1 2009, 20:51) *
So Zmeej will be happy - I've found something I don't like.

I REALLY do NOT like having images I post resized to 500px max width. Completely unacceptable. No forum software resize gives acceptable quality. It saves not a single jot of bandwidth for anyone. It's completely unnecessary.

Please fix.

Neil


Doesn't it allow for clicking on the resized image to be viewed in original size, afaik it actually loads the original size and just resizes it for viewing (just click to view original size - it doesn't re-download) if you know what i mean.
Gert
QUOTE (paranoik0 @ May 1 2009, 22:27) *
It is necessary, for people with lower resolutions so that it doesn't ruin the layout of the page. Has worked fine for ages in another forum I go in.
The limit usually is 800x600.

Maybe, but 500 is not even half a screen width for most people...
Option1
Ok so a couple of points.

1. Yes, it did allow clicking to get to the original size, but why the extra effort? Why the unnecessary, wasted effort?

2. As I noted in my first post on the subject, the downsizing to 500px resulted in a freaking horrible image! So bad that I would disable all my links to my images and certainly wouldn't post any again - maybe no great loss, but it does show how badly I think the downsizing was.

3. I hate BBs that decide on some arbitary limit (can you say 10/tenths or whatever they call themselves - they have a photographers forum that actually frowns on anyone posting pictures at all).

4. If you don't want to see images as the photographer intended them then don't click on the threads that may obviously contain pictures.

5. It's 2009, if you can't cope with an image of 150 to 200kb or so in size then maybe you should consider moving back into the cave and ditching your Commodore 64.

6. As I also noted in my earlier post, no size limit for images worked just fine on the old board. No reason it can't work equally well now.

biggrin.gif

Neil
Vitesse2
QUOTE (Dragonfly @ May 1 2009, 21:05) *
Hack
if you want to have a readable, meaningful and friendly BB where the contents is what really matters
- keep directly posted images resized
- encourage posting links instead of images
- avatars may become a bit larger but not unlimited
- limit the signature area

This is based on my personal experience and with my good intentions to be helpful.

Also this is what appears on the top with Mozilla Firefox - two rows override.


On many IPB boards in the marked area there is a line (command) "Mark all forums as read". Very useful if one wants to see the new posts after the last visit. The old platform did this automatically.

Yes, I find it annoying (in some ways) that there's no automatic "mark forums read". From observation - and correct me if I'm wrong - this used to refresh itself after 30 minutes: I'd very often spend about 40 minutes in TNF, then go to PC, to find only a couple of threads which were allegedly unread, despite the fact that I hadn't been online for 12 hours! Same on TrackForum, which also uses vBulletin. But not on 10 Tenths (also vBulletin, but a later version) confused.gif

To be fair, I have little experience of using IP.Board BBs, so perhaps there's no way of doing this. It doesn't appear to be an option on PHP boards either - I'm on several BBs which use PHP and have to use a "mark forums read" link on those.
Greg Locock
Hi , my inbox is 94% full and I have received no messages in it since Jan (nobody love me), yet I have just had one message emailed to me.

Cheers

Confused Greg
wonk123
Maybe I just hate change, but this new look BB sucks. There even be another topic about this but navigating around here makes it hard to find. Hopefully they are just teething problems, but cna someone please fix the page number and box alignment PLEASE. Also what is the go withthe reply button quoting the last post?
primer
QUOTE (wonk123 @ May 2 2009, 06:48) *
Maybe I just hate change, but this new look BB sucks. There even be another topic about this but navigating around here makes it hard to find.

The official whine thread is here.

QUOTE (wonk123 @ May 2 2009, 06:48) *
but cna someone please fix the page number and box alignment PLEASE.

They are 'fixed' already. Which old browser (and version) are you using?

QUOTE (wonk123 @ May 2 2009, 06:48) *
Also what is the go withthe reply button quoting the last post?


If you want to quote a person, use the button next to their post. If you do not want to quote anyone, use at the bottom and top of the page.

Or you could still click on , select and delete the quoted text and post your own thoughts in place.
wonk123
Thanks for that, using IE7 mods u can delete or merge this if u like, i have had my whinge
primer
Do not worry, large images won't ruin the entire page layout.
Only the post that contains the large image will require scrolling (horizontal), if the image exceeds a user's screen resolution.

For the sake of illustration:



See, all other posts don't require horizontal scrolling to be read because of one large image. It's okay.
primer
Microsoft Internet Explorer 8.
Atreiu
I liked the old look, had an old school feeling compared to this, which is just too cold/square
It's all okay, anyhow.

Quick reply is the best new feature, IMO.
klyster
The new board logs me on automatically now, that never worked for me before....

I like it biggrin.gif

Cheers for the effort.
Alfisti
sO YOUR WHINGE IS oK BUT MINE AND SEVERAL OTHERS ISN'T?

Damn caps!!

IMHO when Hack gets a free second (could take a few months as he has a shed load of work to do now poor bastard), he'll trim this board down to a slimmer, neater and tidier look.

QUOTE (Option1 @ May 2 2009, 00:16) *
Ok so a couple of points.

1. Yes, it did allow clicking to get to the original size, but why the extra effort? Why the unnecessary, wasted effort?

2. As I noted in my first post on the subject, the downsizing to 500px resulted in a freaking horrible image! So bad that I would disable all my links to my images and certainly wouldn't post any again - maybe no great loss, but it does show how badly I think the downsizing was.

3. I hate BBs that decide on some arbitary limit (can you say 10/tenths or whatever they call themselves - they have a photographers forum that actually frowns on anyone posting pictures at all).

4. If you don't want to see images as the photographer intended them then don't click on the threads that may obviously contain pictures.

5. It's 2009, if you can't cope with an image of 150 to 200kb or so in size then maybe you should consider moving back into the cave and ditching your Commodore 64.

6. As I also noted in my earlier post, no size limit for images worked just fine on the old board. No reason it can't work equally well now.

biggrin.gif

Neil

Zmeej
Neil kiss.gif lol.gif
QUOTE
So Zmeej will be happy - I've found something I don't like.

Hey, I'd be delirious if somehow Hack could find a way to preserve all of the looks and customizations of the Atlas BB and yet manage to make the overall thang safe, secure and fast - i.e. keep the wolf sated and the goat whole.
(If you didn't guess, the last bit is a Ukey proverb)
QUOTE
Hack, you're a fine upstanding gentleman!

This he certainly appears to be. up.gif up.gif up.gif


BTW, please do get rid of that infernally irritating and
space-wasting "quote graphic."
Chubby_Deuce
You are very much free to leave. Please consider this option.
Option1
QUOTE (Alfisti @ May 1 2009, 22:44) *
sO YOUR WHINGE IS oK BUT MINE AND SEVERAL OTHERS ISN'T?

Damn caps!!...
But of course. cat.gif

And good to see you finally back to your historical typing skills. tongue.gif

Neil
cheapracer
FWIW with this new BB the pages load way faster for me, thanks.

I don't like the colour scheme though.
Barramut
Why the Board have changed the engine?
Its bcs of the cost of it?
I didn't like it.

Also I can't hide the avatars and emoticons, what meakes it cumberstone to use in the work breaks.
cheapracer
Wheres the search button please?

Oh that would be the one immediately below and to the left DUH!!
mclarensmps
It's fine...
primer
QUOTE (cheapracer @ May 2 2009, 10:39) *
Oh that would be the one immediately below and to the left DUH!!


That too.


primer
QUOTE (Barramut @ May 2 2009, 10:37) *
Why the Board have changed the engine?
Its bcs of the cost of it?


No. The old software had many security holes. Autosport must have *paid* for this upgrade (although they could have used phpbb 3.0.4 for free cat.gif).

QUOTE (Barramut @ May 2 2009, 10:37) *
I didn't like it.

Well, you must be happy now.

QUOTE (Barramut @ May 2 2009, 10:37) *
Also I can't hide the avatars and emoticons

Yes, we can! Yes, we can!! Yes, we can!111
Stephen W
QUOTE (Zmeej @ May 2 2009, 03:49) *
Neil kiss.gif lol.gif

BTW, please do get rid of that infernally irritating and
space-wasting "quote graphic."


Actually I like the idea but agree there is a bit of wasted space; so why not just reduce the size of it?

wave.gif
Gert
QUOTE (Gert @ May 1 2009, 12:55) *
Hm,

It seems the option to download or print a topic are not working for 100% -- or maybe I haven't figured out yet how to do it...

Short topics seem to work fine, for example this topic, of only 5 pages.

If I pick options -> Print this topic I get a printable version of the whole topic.
Ditto if I go for options -> Download this topic
  • Printer Friendly Version -> gives me the same result as "Print this topic"
  • Download HTML Version -> saves that same result as a html file on my disk
  • Download Microsoft Word Version -> save that same result as a doc file on my disk


If I try the same thing here on this 44-page topic then I don't get all the posts. The last one is from June 30, 2005, while even today replies have been added there.
I can't find a way to download or print the remaining posts.


I've checked a few other topics, and it seems that the printed version and the downloaded versions consistently show only the first 300 posts. There's no option to see, print or save the other ones.

Is there a reason for this, and can it be fixed?
Hack
QUOTE (Gert @ May 2 2009, 11:43) *
I've checked a few other topics, and it seems that the printed version and the downloaded versions consistently show only the first 300 posts.


Seems to be a bug. Not the highest priority to fix, though.
Hack
QUOTE (Ivan @ May 1 2009, 17:36) *
Hack,
This may have been mentioned before but, I just noticed it. I was just in a thread with a long title...
The - The AUTOSPORT Bulletin Board> Forums> etc stretched all the way across and blocked Calender, Members, etc so that you can't click on those.


Fixed. Or should I say Hacked? biggrin.gif
Stephen W
QUOTE (Hack @ May 2 2009, 11:52) *
Fixed. Or should I say Hacked? biggrin.gif


Oh dear - one should never use the word hacked despite using the sobriquet of "Hack". It gets the natives restless!

wink.gif
Hack
QUOTE (le chat noir @ Apr 30 2009, 21:18) *
also i wonder whether the RC subforums need to be shown at the top of the page? is the RC archive really the most important thing? couldn't we move that to the bottom of the page? and does that betting one need to be there? why not add it to the main forum index, or provide a smaller ad for it - you can reduce its biog to one line easy.


If you click the "minus" icon on the right hand side of the sub forums box they will be minimised and the system should remember your preference.
condor
QUOTE (primer @ May 1 2009, 04:17) *
It is not clear you clicked on what over where (and how this should launch a toolbar), so just to be safe download and do a thorough scan with Microsoft Malicious Software Removal Tool. It will remove most malware, adware, hijackers, crapware etc.

Also, if you are using an older version of Internet Explorer, it is time to upgrade to Internet Explorer 8. Microsoft recommends it for security reasons.


Thanks for the info - but microsoft malware remove full scan has said I'm not infected...when I still am.
The drop down thing on the tool bar said to click to install active x....since then It's been very difficult to view any threads as e.machines ( my comp) says it can't find ...then it gives a website 'ads something' which obviously isn't Atlas/Autosport .

I deleted all cookies yesterday...and there's another load of them today ad.yieldmanager@doubleclick seems to be the main one, but there are a lot of other ad type ones there as well.
The next step forward, I think, is for me to delete the cookies agian and look to restore my comp to a previous date....unless there's an easier way to fix this ?
Rob29
No longer seem to receive e-mail advising me of new posts in thread previously subscribed to.
Gilles4Ever
QUOTE (Rob29 @ May 2 2009, 13:14) *
No longer seem to receive e-mail advising me of new posts in thread previously subscribed to.

Subscribed threads didn't survive the migration, you need to re subscribe.
Hack
QUOTE (Zmeej @ May 2 2009, 03:49) *
BTW, please do get rid of that infernally irritating and
space-wasting "quote graphic."


I have tweaked the quote box styling to drop the quote mark image and reduce the space used and also add a bit of an indent. There were some suggestions to use bold text but it looked rather stark and out of place, so let's see how we get on like this.

Regarding thread subscriptions, the easy way to re-subscribe is to click the Options button top left in each thread and click 'Track this topic'.
Runner
Unlike the old version, the new search mechanism does not work for a inquiry of three letters - such as FIA. A search on FIA produced no results. Its very hard to call this an upgrade when it doesn't work as well as the previous version. Functionality seems to have fallen victim to fancy graphics.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2012 Invision Power Services, Inc.