QUOTE (Levike @ Dec 31 2010, 06:54)

I don't want them to be on the grid. They don't deserve it.
I don't agree, the team gained the initial approval, they deserve it, the goalposts obviously moved for them, not their fault at all, and it does produce a big gap from what I have seen when teams have collosal pursestrings.
The bigger teams can carry on with a huge development, granted they have had a year to sort out a new chassis/base to build the chassis, but the problem is HRT don't look attractive performance wise, no performance = possible uninterested potential sponsors. would you rather have your logos small on a red prancing horse, or big on a backmarker with no history? I personally would rather have my name emblazoned huge billboard style on a backmarker, but what do i know?!
They struggled/are struggling, They have a 2010 car that raced a whole season, would have been borderline mostly in the 107%. I think it will be another disappointing season performance wise, I just hope sponsors are a little more forthcoming for them and on top of that, wouldn't it be great if they did have some demon engineering on a budget.
just to add, i agree with whoever said about the smaller teams having that 'spark', I really like it when jordan sprang up the ranks. I like that, the paintworks, the trying to build a brand and a race crafted team. I hope names stay the same, but obviously people buy each other out.