VicR
It is YOU who clearly doesn't know a blessed thing about neurology, nor anything else about diagnostic practice, and are contesting the knowledge (not merely the opinion) of a person who briefly ran a neurosurgical practice set up by SID WATKINS!!!!
Have you heard of Sid Watkins?
This Sid Watkins:
http://www.grandprix.com/gpe/cref-watpro.htmlhttp://www.forumula1.net/tag/sid-watkins/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sid_WatkinsIn the meantime, strongly suggest that you follow Dragonfly's advice and stop being abusive to bl-f1.
Given that bl-f1 is a respected medical official for whom the topic of this debate is directly in his field of expertise and you are a random asshole who joined this BB four months ago, it is YOU whose opinion would not be missed.
Rinehart
QUOTE
Firstly I'm not a Massa fan, secondly as per my previous post, you want to call me a hysterical rude biovating whatsit for believing the statements of Massa doctor and surgeon over someone on here who you don't know but claims to be a doctor.
First off, I wasn't addressing myself to you, but VicR, nor did I initially have your posts in mind when I composed my reply to him.
Second, I have absolutely no problem with you or anyone else believing one doctor over another, nor, as it happens, does bl-f1.
However, now that you've drawn my attention to them, there certainly is a problem with
the way you express your disbelief in (rather than simple disagreement with) what bl-f1 has to say. In fact, this post:
QUOTE
"I treat over 100 head injuries per year"
Over the internet? Get a grip...
You say your are thinking the same as many neurosurgeons around the world, but evidently not the one that treated Massa or his doctor.
... suggests to me that you have very little experience with the way that medical professionals can disagree about a diagnosis and treatment, and like VicR and highdownforce, have little or no experience with and knowledge about how neurologists make their diagnoses, and yet you set yourself up as a judge of his expertise.
Not only that, you've repeatedly suggested that bl-f1 is LYING about his qualifications and experience.
OK, then.
So if we do an inventory of the applicability to you of the epithets I use in my reply to VicR - it seems you're not being hysterical, and you haven't really ranted nor bloviated, but you've definitely been as rude as a baboon off the veldt.
EDIT: BTW, suggest you guys read umapython's post above.
Even though
a) I don't agree with him,
b) he clearly disagrees with bl-f1,
he managed to express himself without throwing down any obtuse jailyard challenges.