Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Spa Preview
The AUTOSPORT Bulletin Board > Forums > Racing Comments
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4
Mandzipop
Badoer will be last and/or will crash out, get speeding fines etc etc............................
Tenmantaylor
QUOTE (cheapracer @ Aug 24 2009, 02:19) *
McLaren will romp it, their KERS package is too strong and Spa is a power circuit.


La source to Les Combes is 20s full throttle, KERS can only be used for 6s a lap. T14 to the final chicane is another 15-20s full throttle. KERs will only help Lewis pass once a lap if he he has the aero to stay close. On top of this there are only 2 or 3 big harvesting zones at Spa for the KERs to be recharged which work against it compared to most tracks .

Id still take it if on offer but I dont think its quite the advantage as Valencia where there are 4 shorter straights to deploy and lots of recharge zones.
Ruud de la Rosa
everyone thinks the red bulls will dominate, I however am not so sure after their bad performance in valencia. Why weren't they as good as before in Valencia? purely the nature of the circuit and the temperature? hungary was pretty hot/warm as well and resembles valancia a bit.
engel
Valencia and Hungary are traction tracks (as is Monaco)
Spa (and Nurburgring and Silverstone and Monza etc) are aero ....
hot/cold is more a brawn issue not a redbull issue
K-One
QUOTE (Brawn BGP 001 @ Aug 24 2009, 15:10) *
roflmao.gif

I feel sorry for Seb, he has had some rotten luck this year, I can see him winning here if his engine lasts.


You make your own luck. It's evident that Seb is another car-breaker
mstar
well i have a theory that redbulls big jump in silverstone was HUGE but slowely others have clawed back. Now in spa lets hope its like silverstone (but redbull advantage reduced) rubens still finished on the podium and nobody else could challenge rubens for 3rd. We all agree brawn have improved a little more since then so HOPEFULLY if tyre problem is solved a little brawn can at least challenge for the podium. THe problem is teams like mclaren, williams and ferrari if KERS not much of a help we can eliminate mclaren and ferrari but williams been fast everywhere so they may spoil brawns party if they cannot get the tyres sorted.
dank
Anticipated on track action aside for one moment...

Looks like they've only managed to sell 46,000 tickets for race day and need at least 70,000 to break even. They lost €4m when 55,000 attended last year. Not good.
PNSD
QUOTE (mstar @ Aug 26 2009, 11:23) *
well i have a theory that redbulls big jump in silverstone was HUGE but slowely others have clawed back. Now in spa lets hope its like silverstone (but redbull advantage reduced) rubens still finished on the podium and nobody else could challenge rubens for 3rd. We all agree brawn have improved a little more since then so HOPEFULLY if tyre problem is solved a little brawn can at least challenge for the podium. THe problem is teams like mclaren, williams and ferrari if KERS not much of a help we can eliminate mclaren and ferrari but williams been fast everywhere so they may spoil brawns party if they cannot get the tyres sorted.


Silverstone was very close between Brawn, Ferrari and Williams, but now they all have Mclaren in the mix.

If Button doesnt get qualifying right he could well find himself out of the points...
jdanton
QUOTE (dank @ Aug 26 2009, 12:32) *
Anticipated on track action aside for one moment...

Looks like they've only managed to sell 46,000 tickets for race day and need at least 70,000 to break even. They lost €4m when 55,000 attended last year. Not good.


Well, I'll be there with GA ticket which costs € 160. My hotel and rental car don't cost that much combined. The grandstand tickets were substantially more than that. Stupid CVC debt service.
hello86
http://www.ferrari.com/English/News/Pages/...GP_preview.aspx

QUOTE
The benefit of KERS has been ably demonstrated by our drivers in recent races, however, with the Source hairpin coming so soon after the start, it is unlikely that the first few hundred metres will show the benefit at this track. However, once past the hairpin, the long straight, first downhill to Eau Rouge, a corner which could become more of a challenge again, and then up the hill on the other side will provide the most graphic illustration of what extra power generation can do. In fact, the Scuderia engineers believe that KERS will have more of an impact here than at any other circuit on the calendar. Overtaking is possible at Spa, because of the slipstreaming effect and this year, those cars running KERS will probably be able to run slightly more aerodynamic downforce than those without, thus having a power advantage on the faster sections and more grip on the slower ones.

On the tyre front, Bridgestone is bringing their Soft and Medium compounds, rather than the more usual pattern of bringing two types of tyre with a greater difference between them. It is clear that for the F60 it is usually a case of the softer the better, even if that situation has improved in recent races, but the greater similarity between the Prime and Option at this race, should help on this front. Some uncharacteristic warm weather would also be a benefit.
Crazy Ninja
Ah im so excited!!!!!!!!!!! I just love Spa, even more so after Valencia lol.gif
Jedi_F1
QUOTE (Crazy Ninja @ Aug 26 2009, 20:54) *
Ah im so excited!!!!!!!!!!! I just love Spa, even more so after Valencia lol.gif


And I'm leaving for it tomorrow morning ;-)

Pitwalk on thursday 15:30 is the first thing on the schedule!
Owen
QUOTE (Crazy Ninja @ Aug 26 2009, 20:54) *
Ah im so excited!!!!!!!!!!! I just love Spa, even more so after Valencia lol.gif

Should be a complete contrast, including the weather!
Fallout
Just to satisfy your Spa appetite before the weekend, I bring you the old Raikkonen in 2002 at Spa: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R1Hz7ItDX68

Don't you miss the old qualifying system (and the old Kimi for that sake?) where the drivers were absolutely on the edge? biggrin.gif
DOF_power
Unless it rains it will be another boring race.
sv401
QUOTE (craftverk @ Aug 25 2009, 15:07) *
I don't think KERS will be a big help, it may even be a disadvantage when it comes to car balance in corners like pouhon.


Is the length of the track possibly a disadvantage for KERS ? It is 7 km long, with lap times close to 2 minutes, yet the device can still be used only for 6.67 seconds. I would have assumed that it is better for tracks like Interlagos or Monza, but maybe there are places at Spa where it really gains a lot of time.
Tenmantaylor
QUOTE (sv401 @ Aug 26 2009, 23:21) *
but maybe there are places at Spa where it really gains a lot of time.


I don't think it does. If you set your gearing to take advantage of KERS at the end of straights you'll only be able to use it on one straight and the lower revs you find yourself at the 2nd straight will be a disadvantage. If you decide to use it to get to your top speed earlier it might save1-2 tenths at the most per lap. And as said Spa is only a 44 lap GP due to circuit length. 44x6s deployments = 264s deployment time over the race compared to 342s at Valencia. Spa is primarily about downforce level to achieve top speed and find an excellent mechanical setup for the twisty middle sector.

FIA need to get rid of rev limiters and maybe change the KERS usage time to make it more interesting/usable.
Ruud de la Rosa
QUOTE (Tenmantaylor @ Aug 27 2009, 01:03) *
I don't think it does. If you set your gearing to take advantage of KERS at the end of straights you'll only be able to use it on one straight and the lower revs you find yourself at the 2nd straight will be a disadvantage. If you decide to use it to get to your top speed earlier it might save1-2 tenths at the most per lap. And as said Spa is only a 44 lap GP due to circuit length. 44x6s deployments = 264s deployment time over the race compared to 342s at Valencia. Spa is primarily about downforce level to achieve top speed and find an excellent mechanical setup for the twisty middle sector.

FIA need to get rid of rev limiters and maybe change the KERS usage time to make it more interesting/usable.



if you only use it for a couple of seconds coming out of la source, the extra speed will carry trough during the 1.8km straight. (providing eau rouge is still flat; http://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com/26082009/58/...amp;order=date). That's a massive gain IMO.
engel
I think it's more likely kers teams will try to run half a degree of extra wing (and compensate with Kers) than seek to outright outaccelarate people with it. And remember spa is short lights-to-first-corner so I doubt there will be fireworks at the start.
Melbourne Park
QUOTE (Tenmantaylor @ Aug 27 2009, 09:03) *
FIA need to get rid of rev limiters and maybe change the KERS usage time to make it more interesting/usable.


That is what the FIA wanted to do, and double the KERS capacity. But the cost was controlling costs! FOTA did not want controls of costs, rather they wanted a "gradual" drop in spending ... in other words, they did not want to drop spending! So the solution is to continue to dumb down F1, and to continue to have high costs. stoned.gif

The good news is that nice chaps like Flavio and Adrian and the rest will continue to get paid a bit more than most blokes do.
Ruud de la Rosa
QUOTE (Melbourne Park @ Aug 27 2009, 03:38) *
That is what the FIA wanted to do, and double the KERS capacity. But the cost was controlling costs! FOTA did not want controls of costs, rather they wanted a "gradual" drop in spending ... in other words, they did not want to drop spending! So the solution is to continue to dumb down F1, and to continue to have high costs. stoned.gif

The good news is that nice chaps like Flavio and Adrian and the rest will continue to get paid a bit more than most blokes do.


how exactly is KERS controlling costs?
Sabre1977
QUOTE (learningtobelost @ Aug 24 2009, 10:33) *
None of these thing are really bad luck. They are mistakes, either by the team (in terms of the mechanical failures) or by the driver. Also, I really have to wonder how you think Alonso was a strong candidate for victory in hungary, he had roughly **** all fuel in the car for qualli and like the few times they've done this earlier in the season he was almost certainly going to be fighting for the last points using this strategy.

It's a shame to see him stuck in that Renault, let's hope the Ferrari deal is true. Renault just aren't going to produce a competetive car for him.

I don´t Know if Alonso was in position to fight for victory with Hamilton, but Alonso was a strong candidate to get a Podium finish in that race.

When Alonso made his first pitstop (Lap 10 or eleven, I don´t remember), he came out of pits ahead of Piquet.
When Kimi (Second in Hungary) made his first pitstop (Lap 17 maybe?), he came out of pits behind Nelsinho.
glorius&victorius
any pictures from Spa? I cant wait to see the atmosphere...
engel
QUOTE (Melbourne Park @ Aug 27 2009, 02:38) *
That is what the FIA wanted to do, and double the KERS capacity. But the cost was controlling costs! FOTA did not want controls of costs, rather they wanted a "gradual" drop in spending ... in other words, they did not want to drop spending! So the solution is to continue to dumb down F1, and to continue to have high costs. stoned.gif

The good news is that nice chaps like Flavio and Adrian and the rest will continue to get paid a bit more than most blokes do.



You are quite wrong on that front ... KERS development costs easily broke the FIA's proposed budget cap.

And the FIA intended to increase KERS capacity in 2011 not 2010, 2011 regulations are still about 10 months away, KERS might still get a boost in the regulations that make it more useful. But keep in mind it will come with a compromise, increased storage requirements ie more batteries ie more weight.
Lazy Prodigy
its supposed to be a dry weekend.
Ruud de la Rosa
QUOTE (engel @ Aug 27 2009, 12:10) *
You are quite wrong on that front ... KERS development costs easily broke the FIA's proposed budget cap.

And the FIA intended to increase KERS capacity in 2011 not 2010, 2011 regulations are still about 10 months away, KERS might still get a boost in the regulations that make it more useful. But keep in mind it will come with a compromise, increased storage requirements ie more batteries ie more weight.


if the output power remains the same the batteries don't have to become bigger. you need to cycle twice during a lap in that case.
Francesc
Some low downforce rear wings:



engel
QUOTE (Ruud de la Rosa @ Aug 27 2009, 11:19) *
if the output power remains the same the batteries don't have to become bigger. you need to cycle twice during a lap in that case.


output power increases actually ... bolded for effect. And I m quoting myself cause I can smile.gif

QUOTE (engel @ Aug 19 2009, 15:51) *
The original announcement was

KERS 60KW - 400KJ/Lap Optional in 2009
KERS 60KW - 400KJ/Lap Mandatory in 2010
KERS 200KW - 1.6MJ/Lap Mandatory in 2011


ie there was no plan for Kers specs changing in 2010. The only deviation from the plan is that KERS wasn't made mandatory for 2010 (since FOTA voted it out earlier this season)

When the cost cap/non cost cap crap was going on they had mandated 120KW Kers units for cost capped teams for 2010 but that was obviously scrapped along with the rest of the cost cap crap.
MichaelJP
QUOTE (Lazy Prodigy @ Aug 27 2009, 11:17) *
its supposed to be a dry weekend.


I really hope not, F1 could do with an interesting race after the Valencia procession.
Lazy Prodigy
QUOTE (Francesc @ Aug 27 2009, 06:26) *
Some low downforce rear wings:

cool first time all year i think we have seen those.
Ruud de la Rosa
QUOTE (engel @ Aug 27 2009, 12:37) *
output power increases actually ... bolded for effect. And I m quoting myself cause I can smile.gif


is that a upper limit or a fixed value? could they run @ 100 KJ/s for twice the duration for instance?
Ruud de la Rosa
QUOTE (Lazy Prodigy @ Aug 27 2009, 12:56) *
cool first time all year i think we have seen those.


what team will benefit most from the lower downforce? mclaren already had lower downforce in the beginning of the year, could this be an advantage or them? (or less of a disadvantage)
Lazy Prodigy
disadvantage
Hole
QUOTE (Muz Bee @ Aug 25 2009, 00:12) *
You can say it in any language you like Buddy, it's still the same. Do the maths - Alonso + Renault + SLOW, no light fuel load can disguise it and the lap times don't back up the fuel pump claims. We are supposed to be talking about Spa aren't we? If you want to put money on Fernado winning I'mn sure you will get great odds. rolleyes.gif


It's interesting that if you go to Kimi's Official Forum most of forumers there consider Renault to be in the same level than Ferrari. I don't think so of course, but actually you cannot stat anything for sure yet either because neither Hungary nor Valencia can be taken surely to know where Renault really is, due car failures.

In Germany Renault had a pretty competitive performance, even when the car had just loaded fuel. Too bad the awful strategy pushed the Renault to the back of the grid, but still Alonso was able to recover quite a lot to finish in points.

I'm not saying Renault is great, because it isn't. I just mean "wait and see and let's not take Renault out of the battle so surely".
DanDectis
So is the word that it's going to be a dry weekend? I'm shocked autosport doesn't have the weather forecast up for the weekend yet...

I find it funny again though that Planet F1 has an article saying "Weather looks uncertain as ever" and every single other site has it being dry. That site is great to see how wrong they get it
Henrytheeigth
I am curious, has anyone ever actually watched the Belgium GP whilst sitting in a spa bath?
DanDectis
QUOTE (Henrytheeigth @ Aug 27 2009, 08:59) *
I am curious, has anyone ever actually watched the Belgium GP whilst sitting in a spa bath?


No, but that sounds delightful! smoking.gif
Ruud de la Rosa
QUOTE (DanDectis @ Aug 27 2009, 14:54) *
So is the word that it's going to be a dry weekend? I'm shocked autosport doesn't have the weather forecast up for the weekend yet...

I find it funny again though that Planet F1 has an article saying "Weather looks uncertain as ever" and every single other site has it being dry. That site is great to see how wrong they get it


http://www.autosport.com/f1/

rain for Saturday, dry on Sunday. (no mention on what time the rain is supposed to fall)
Henrytheeigth
QUOTE (DanDectis @ Aug 27 2009, 23:01) *
No, but that sounds delightful! smoking.gif


And very apropriate as well! lol.gif
DanDectis
QUOTE (Ruud de la Rosa @ Aug 27 2009, 09:04) *
http://www.autosport.com/f1/

rain for Saturday, dry on Sunday. (no mention on what time the rain is supposed to fall)



ah yes, thank you, I forgot about that part! But I was actually referring to the "detailed weather forecast" which would be...well....detailed.

anyway, thanks for this
DanDectis
I'm doing what I usually do, predicting the result I'm hoping for: A closer championship coming out than going in. It's not that I don't want Button or Brawn to win, it's that I want whoever wins to do so in the last race. Think of the excitement surrounding a championship finale on a new track.

wow
Seanspeed
All gonna depend on the weather. I'm less interested in seeing whether its going to rain, and more interested in the temperatures. Whether its going to rain is hardly ever definite, while temperatures are typically more predictable 3 to 4 days ahead of time.

Low temperatures(below 75 degrees) - I expect Red Bull to be strong. The track will already be good for them, with the fast corners and all, too. One big problem, though - Spa is hard on engines, which is probably a big concern for the Red Bull guys right now.

Warmer temperatures - I expect it will be much closer between Red Bull and BrawnGP.

Of course, I think Lewis could be a genuine threat again, too. Their car seems to work well regardless of the temperatures. I'm not sure how much of their recent success has been down the track layouts suiting them, but I'm guessing that there's much more to their improvement than just that.

And while I think Kimi is usually great here, I'm worried that since Ferrari have kinda stopped their development of the car for the most part, that there might not be much he can do to pull a surprise win or anything. I think a podium would be a good result.

Rosberg and Alonso are always up there, but I dont think they're gonna be threatening the guys up front at all. Behind them, who knows? The field is quite tight and things tend to get a bit more unpredictable, especially with BMW and Toyota being so incredibly inconsistent from track-to-track.
Ruud de la Rosa
QUOTE (DanDectis @ Aug 27 2009, 15:12) *
I'm doing what I usually do, predicting the result I'm hoping for: A closer championship coming out than going in. It's not that I don't want Button or Brawn to win, it's that I want whoever wins to do so in the last race. Think of the excitement surrounding a championship finale on a new track.

wow


It will be difficult to beat Brazil 2008 but I'd love to see it come close this year!
Slyder
The only way that it wil come close will be if all 4 drivers (RB and Brawn) are within 4 points of each other, or a 4 way tie, and it's decided on the last lap at the finish line.... by a nose... IRL style wink.gif tongue.gif
DanDectis
QUOTE (Ruud de la Rosa @ Aug 27 2009, 09:17) *
It will be difficult to beat Brazil 2008 but I'd love to see it come close this year!


That's what we said after Brazil 2007! lol.gif
Ruud de la Rosa
formula1.com weather:

rain for practice & qualifying

Welcome to the Belgian Grand Prix at Spa-Francorchamps, the 12th round of the 2009 FIA Formula One World Championship.

Despite a heatwave in the Hautes Fagnes region last week, Spa looks set to be wet as showers are forecast for Thursday through Saturday, when the ambient temperature will begin at 24 degrees Celsius and decline to 20, then 17. Race day should be dry with partial cloud and 18 degrees.

The race will run over 44 laps of the 7.004 kilometre (4.352 mile) track, or 308.176 kilometres (191.494 miles). It starts at 14.00 hours local time, which is two hours ahead of GMT.
abc
QUOTE (AdamKOR @ Aug 27 2009, 13:47) *
In Germany Renault had a pretty competitive performance, even when the car had just loaded fuel. Too bad the awful strategy pushed the Renault to the back of the grid, but still Alonso was able to recover quite a lot to finish in points.

Yes, throwing the car off the track in Q2 was definitely awful strategy by Renault. rolleyes.gif
DanDectis
QUOTE (abc @ Aug 27 2009, 09:44) *
Yes, throwing the car off the track in Q2 was definitely awful strategy by Renault. rolleyes.gif


"I can't believe that spin didn't save .7s!"
Hole
QUOTE (abc @ Aug 27 2009, 15:44) *
Yes, throwing the car off the track in Q2 was definitely awful strategy by Renault. rolleyes.gif


Alonso finished 7th despite during the race he was pushed back to the last positions. His strategy got ruined in part for the same reason than Kimi.

When Alonso pitted for the last time he started a quite nice recovery. In fact he got the fastest lap of the race, lap 49 (he pitted in lap 46). Of course BRawnGP had problems with their tyres, colder weather doesn't suit them very well, but Alonso was going during a lot of times and with similar conditions than others only slower than the Red Bulls.

So my statement is still standing.
Youichi
QUOTE (DanDectis @ Aug 27 2009, 14:08) *
ah yes, thank you, I forgot about that part! But I was actually referring to the "detailed weather forecast" which would be...well....detailed.

anyway, thanks for this


How detailed did you want ?

http://live.autosport.com/commentary.php/id/135
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2012 Invision Power Services, Inc.