The AUTOSPORT Bulletin Board > Ladies and gentlemen: the truth on the case Alonso-Hamilton

Full Version: Ladies and gentlemen: the truth on the case Alonso-Hamilton

The AUTOSPORT Bulletin Board > Forums > Racing Comments

Pages: 1, 2

Norm

Aug 28 2009, 17:14

QUOTE (TinyJim @ Aug 28 2009, 12:56)

If people want to analyse who is truly the best driver in the world then F1 aint your game. 50% of the drivers wouldn't even win a club kart race let alone an F1 race! F1 is a game.... and it's how you play it that matters. Some fools just don't understand this

mods please lock the BS thread.

otoelpiloto

Aug 28 2009, 17:14

QUOTE (klover @ Aug 28 2009, 18:08)

Yeah, those spaniards and their crazy theories about "McLaren throwing objects at Alonso's car at night"

did any object ever fell over hamilton's? NO

what do you have to say on the extra laps? was it an inaccurate crazy theory as well?

otoelpiloto

Aug 28 2009, 17:15

QUOTE (abc @ Aug 28 2009, 18:10)

They had the same number of laps with exceptions of Hungary and GB, it was nowhere near the score 7:2.
And as for Alonso was faster in Hungary, well thats nonsense anyway, Hamilton never did his hot lap when track improved the most.
Opening posts analysis is just big LOL.

review the season man, 7 extra laps for 2...7-2

Henrik B

Aug 28 2009, 17:16

QUOTE (Albioncita @ Aug 28 2009, 17:57)

Sabotage was a sabotage

An English journalist clarifies it:
....
If an Englishman says it it he is to be true. Sharp is very objective always. Hamilton and McLaren are swindlers.

My god, my god and I without finding out .

Well, false from the very first sentence... The man writing that is a BLOG READER. He has no more authority and no more insight than the average forum poster. And I really doubt you've read anything else from this "Sharpe" to know anything about his objectivity...

mclarensmps

Aug 28 2009, 17:18

People are still hurting over this shit?

Jesus Christ...

gincarnated

Aug 28 2009, 17:43

QUOTE (The Big Guns @ Aug 28 2009, 18:18)

People are still hurting over this shit?

Jesus Christ...

I guess their pride is damaged and the pain hasn't subsided yet. Mention Lewis is better than Alonso and it makes for a hilariously entertaining tread.

On topic, unfortunate for Alonso? All I have to say is better luck next time.

klover

Aug 28 2009, 17:57

QUOTE (otoelpiloto @ Aug 28 2009, 17:14)

did any object ever fell over hamilton's? NO

what do you have to say on the extra laps? was it an inaccurate crazy theory as well?

Falling objects and throwing objects are the same thing? More like a typical Alonso excuse whenever he loses it's a dark conspiracy against the Asturian prince, it's never his driving.
Having extra laps is proof of sabotage? Then surely Hamilton was sabotaged at Silverstone when they put him on the slower 3-stop strategy... Was he sabotaged in China too when they kept him out despite him wanting to come in earlier and change his worn tyres?

P123

Aug 28 2009, 18:09

I thought only the original poster could be so deluded, but from reading the topic there are another couple aswell. Who opened the gates to the assylum?

P123

Aug 28 2009, 18:11

QUOTE (klover @ Aug 28 2009, 18:57)

Was he sabotaged in China too when they kept him out despite him wanting to come in earlier and change his worn tyres?

Oh why not. If you're 10 years old adn believe in conspiracy theories anything goes!

KiloWatt

Aug 28 2009, 18:19

Oh FFS, cry me a river...

Alonso got the same treatment at Renault before he left with fisi and is getting it now with whomever Flavio hires as Freddy's bitch. Bend over... Damn this F1 drivers are all a bunch of prima donnas.

Unrelated: I personally can't wait for him to go to Ferrari, my dad is a red supporter but despises alonso - I cannot wait to see his face.

Now why don't we all take of these dresses and end this little ****ing tea party? This kind of thread, although initially entertaining, gets wearisome after a while.

stevvy1986

Aug 28 2009, 18:24

What a pathetic thread. Why should we take what a journalist says to be true? Why should we even listen to someone who's first post after joining today is to start a thread on something which happened 2 years ago? Waste of time.

Clatter

Aug 28 2009, 18:29

QUOTE (stevvy1986 @ Aug 28 2009, 19:24)

It once again shows that there needs to be a cooling off period after joining before being allowed to start threads. That would also stop the spam threads that occasionally pop up.

Bumper

Aug 28 2009, 18:30

Groundhog day. The topic has been discussed to death 2 years ago with no new arguments this time.

Closed.

This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.