QUOTE (Jazza @ Jan 2 2010, 02:48)

Is this not exactly what people are saying? That it is not going to plan?
It is obvious that more than one person on this thread has a wish to see them fail. But I think a lot of people are simply pointing out that the teams progress
appears to be behind schedule.
When a team has a dead line to be ready by mid march they can not afford to fall too far behind. In F1, being just a week behind could be the end of the world
(how about a little helping of melodrama
) if your plan has the start of March already filled up with other work. If they have given themselves a cushion (i.e if they have planned for everything to be done by March 1st), they may be ok, as they have spare time to catch up if they are behind. If they have no planned cushion (or too small of a cushion), then being behind now may be impossible to rectify.
I don't see this as hate, but genuine concern that the team is
maybe behind schedule and will
perhaps be unable to catch up in time for race one.
First off, please don't put words in my mouth thank you.
I never said they
were behind schedule or even allude to it. What I said was that startups rarely ever go
to their planned schedule. Big difference.
Your post in filled with the same words to help push your agenda that USF1 is not going to make it -
IF,
maybe,
perhaps; it's littered throughout your post and everyone elses that is pushing the same agenda. How about some facts? since we don't have those how about just making something up
My questions for all the nay-sayers are:
You say they are behind schedule, so obviously you have seen their schedule otherwise you wouldn't make silly comments like that so have you seen their schedule?
Why does it appear to be behind schedule?
When you built your team from scratch, what was your schedule?
Finally, did you meet every goal along the way?