QUOTE (Disgrace @ Jan 26 2010, 09:38)

Haha, this thread made me sign up to the forum. Absolute quality thread, been following it from the start.
USF1 are such a curious case. Announced nearly a year ago now, they appear to be the most behind of all of the new teams. Yet Lotus was announced very late and seem to be the favourites to take the new-team honours. Rumours much?
If they want someone who has been driving in TC2000 for the past few leading their team, they are
not investing in him for his skill, technical ability, so called experience and leadership. It has to be the money. After all, it's a championship in which Norberto Fontana has been champion. And who will be their "second" driver? Somebody even less known than Lopez?
As for the team, who are they? Who are the personnel? Ken's son as head of design, really? A bunch of people coming from spec series such as Indycars? What experience to they draw upon to build and design their own car? Lopez can't develop the car either, his Renault testing is now absolutely void: thoroughly out of date given slick tyres and aerodynamic changes that next year, should make sure even the top drivers will take at least the first race or two to get used to. Who will mentor him to drive better if he isn't up to scratch? Who will even mentor the team to mentor him to drive better?
Then there is the risk. Undoubtedly Ken has used his connections such that he can get his pieces from his suppliers, but can they supply F1-grade material that will last a race distance? What about the gearbox they are designing themselves that must last six races? And people think that the Cosworth power unit will be an uncertainty, to them it is the least of their increasingly large list of worries. I think we could see them with fundamental reliability issues, as well as aerodynamic issues with the no wind tunnel time, costing money they probably don't have as will undoubtedly be confirmed by their second driver announcement.
The question is not if they will make it to 2010. I'm sure they will. Whether they will last after the first race is another question though. All of the ingredients are there, as are the parallels, with MasterCard Lola 1997. Not to say it's a certainty they will do so embarrassingly awfully, but the possibility given the immense risks involved means it's a lot higher than for anyone else. If the car lasts the race at all, I will bow down to them. I hope they make it though because otherwise, it would be cringeworthy. It's either one or the other really, then again, it could be said for most of the newbies really.
Well their goal this year is to race, not win, but if that happens all the better.
Who cares what tires Lopez last used, it is about your ability to talk to the engineers and give them feedback on what wheel you feel slipping with your "seat of your pants to be nice". I am sure he can tell understeer from oversteer, can feel an aero change, notice that if he holds his hands up in the air the rpms drop. In karting for example on the superspeedways you could start putting your fingers up one-by-one and see the rpm drop with each. It is not like he is going to tell them the upper a-arm needs to be a different shape, or the wing should use a different profile. Only a handful of drivers in history were that good, and they either designed cars (Bruce) or studied with the engineers to the point they were that good. (Schumacher for example, Senna, etc)
If your driver tells you that the car is lacking grip, but never clarifies where in the corner it is lacking grip then we have issues (Bourdais just yelling that the car is horrible is a good example, engineer says where, he says no grip anywhere - well what good does that do?)