Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Suzuka 2009 Pre-Race Discussion
The AUTOSPORT Bulletin Board > Forums > Racing Comments
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
klyster
QUOTE (Arion @ Oct 2 2009, 07:33) *
they must have poisoned him!



Some dodgy fugu perhaps?
peroa
LeeMcK said that he got aircon flu on the flight to Japan.
Captain Tightpants
Aircon? Sounds like Legionnaires'. If that's the case, he's not racing.
Ruud de la Rosa
QUOTE (Captain Tightpants @ Oct 2 2009, 09:55) *
Aircon? Sounds like Legionnaires'. If that's the case, he's not racing.


bookmakers still have confidence he will race (and finish the race)

Youichi
QUOTE (as65p @ Oct 2 2009, 08:31) *
both drivers always regarded as rather clean racers all their careers..


Button punted Marcos Ambrose out to win the Formula Ford festival, so I wouldn't say he was regarded as clean his enitre career.
Mastah
QUOTE (Alonzo @ Sep 29 2009, 15:39) *
I say BMW, other than mechanical failure(engine or whatever) or weather events like wet session, will be faster than Mclaren in Q2 and/or Q3(fuel corrected). If no problem occur to both drivers of each team, then it's possible to compare fairly the fastest BMW time and the fastest Mclaren time during each quali part.

What we will bet I don't know, you choose. I just want to friendly recommend to not bet because in Spa it was much less clear that Mclaren was still really bad in high speed corners and I was right, now imo only anormal circunstances(like rain) can make Mclaren beat BMW in qualifying.;)


QUOTE (Alonzo @ Oct 1 2009, 02:44) *
For sure Mclaren will suffer in Suzuka, I have no doubt about it.


QUOTE (Alonzo @ Sep 30 2009, 15:23) *
OK, I think both BMW(besides traffic or any other incident) will go to Q3, at least. Hamilton, I believe will qualify in 12th or worse.


stoned.gif
Raziel
Yeah right roflmao.gif
wingwalker
Wow, so BMW look really solid all of the sudden! I think tire management will be key tomorrow and a lot of drivers is going to struggle with that.
Alonzo
QUOTE (Mastah @ Oct 3 2009, 03:42) *
stoned.gif

QUOTE (rodlamas @ Oct 3 2009, 08:54) *
Alonzo is just an stupid fanboy and I don't know why you guys keep answering him.

Just put the troll on the ignore list and do not care to answer him.

QUOTE (Clatter @ Oct 3 2009, 08:59) *
Is there a limit on the number you can have in an ignore list? Don't know why, but this year we seem to have gained far more trolls than before.

Oh, SHUT UP you all.

THis qualifying was a farce. The 3 of you are clearly stupid for not realizing it.

How can the worst car of F1(Toro Rosso) suddenly do well, and the CRAPPY aero car like Mclaren have decent results????

First of all, due to the rain there was no time for the drivers to make proper setup.

Then, the quali itself was quite a lottery because the track was getting a lot of grip by minute, so it was an clean later lap which would give advantadge.

THe most important factor(concerning BMW WHO HAD THE FASTEST SPEED IN SPOON THEREFORE BEST DOWNFORCE) was the tones of red flags which didn't allow many drivers to do proper laps, in BMW's case, THEY ONLY HAD ONE ATTEMPT DUE TO THE YELLOW FLAGS AND IT WAS SCREWED BY BUEMI WHO LEFT MANY PARTS OF THE CAR IN THE STRAIGHT BEFORE 130R AND HEIDFELD AND KUBICA EVEN GOT STUCKED BEHIND HIM WITH A DAMAGE CAR AS FOM SHOWED.

I was completely right about Mclaren in SPa and in a normal weekend it would have happened again. AS I SAID IN THE BET, ANORMAL CIRCUNSTANCES LIKE WHAT HAPPENED WOULD VOID THE BET.

Mastah and Rodlamas are 2 stupid fellows who ignore the reality to have their glory moments. DOn't fool yourselfs, this qualifying didn't show the performance reality in Suzuka. BMW potentially had much more speed as they had the best downforce because Kubica was the fastest in SPoon Apex.
alecc
Reasuming the qualies:
P. Driver Team Weight Lap to pit
1. Sebastian Vettel Red Bull Renault 658,5 53,5 17
2. Jarno Trulli Toyota 655,5 50,5 16
3. Lewis Hamilton McLaren Mercedes 656,0 51,0 17
4. Nick Heidfeld BMW Sauber 660,0 55,0 18
5. Kimi Raikkonen Ferrari 661,0 56,0 18
6. Nico Rosberg Williams Toyota 684,5 79,5 27
7. Robert Kubica BMW Sauber 686,0 81,0 27
8. Adrian Sutil Force India Mercedes 650,0 45,0 14
9. Rubens Barrichello Brawn Mercedes 660,5 55,5 18
10. Jaime Alguersuari Toro Rosso Ferrari 682,5 77,5 26
11. Jenson Button Brawn Mercedes 658,5 53,5 17
12. Giancarlo Fisichella Ferrari 661,5 56,5 19
13. Heikki Kovalainen McLaren Mercedes 675,0 70,0 23
14. Sebastien Buemi Toro Rosso Ferrari 665,4 60,4 20
15. Kazuki Nakajima Williams Toyota 695,7 90,7 31
16. Romain Grosjean Renault 691,8 86,8 30
17. Fernando Alonso Renault 689,5 84,5 29
18. Vitantonio Liuzzi Force India Mercedes 682,5 77,5 26
19. Timo Glock Toyota
20. Mark Webber Red Bull Renault

It doesn't look quite bad for KUB and ROS, isn't it? Pretty better than before the stewards decisions.
In my opinion, the one of the two drivers who will be after the first corner higher, can be on podium.
Clatter
QUOTE (alecc @ Oct 3 2009, 13:18) *
Reasuming the qualies:
P. Driver Team Weight Lap to pit
1. Sebastian Vettel Red Bull Renault 658,5 53,5 17
2. Jarno Trulli Toyota 655,5 50,5 16
3. Lewis Hamilton McLaren Mercedes 656,0 51,0 17
4. Nick Heidfeld BMW Sauber 660,0 55,0 18
5. Kimi Raikkonen Ferrari 661,0 56,0 18
6. Nico Rosberg Williams Toyota 684,5 79,5 27
7. Robert Kubica BMW Sauber 686,0 81,0 27
8. Adrian Sutil Force India Mercedes 650,0 45,0 14
9. Rubens Barrichello Brawn Mercedes 660,5 55,5 18
10. Jaime Alguersuari Toro Rosso Ferrari 682,5 77,5 26
11. Jenson Button Brawn Mercedes 658,5 53,5 17
12. Giancarlo Fisichella Ferrari 661,5 56,5 19
13. Heikki Kovalainen McLaren Mercedes 675,0 70,0 23
14. Sebastien Buemi Toro Rosso Ferrari 665,4 60,4 20
15. Kazuki Nakajima Williams Toyota 695,7 90,7 31
16. Romain Grosjean Renault 691,8 86,8 30
17. Fernando Alonso Renault 689,5 84,5 29
18. Vitantonio Liuzzi Force India Mercedes 682,5 77,5 26
19. Timo Glock Toyota
20. Mark Webber Red Bull Renault

It doesn't look quite bad for KUB and ROS, isn't it? Pretty better than before the stewards decisions.
In my opinion, the one of the two drivers who will be after the first corner higher, can be on podium.


Think HK should be in 11th once all the penalties have played out.
wingwalker
SC in the right time and Rosberg or Kubica might finish REALLY high. They're looking good even without that, though.
Urawa
The BMW upgrade might have predicted a serious laptime gain in the wind tunnel (numbers were ~1 sec), but on a real track it looks like the improvement is not even half a second.
aguri
I've got a feeling tomorrows race will be one to remember, especially if it rains.
bond
QUOTE (Alonzo @ Oct 3 2009, 13:17) *
How can the worst car of F1(Toro Rosso) suddenly do well


Toro Rosso has a new floor this weekend...
Alonzo
You know, who doesn't have arguments use emoticons. This is very well known thing in the internet. lol.gif

The facts more detailed: http://www.formula1.com/results/season/200...ctor_times.html
BMW was the fastest in S1, but had bad S2 and S3 because in Q2(where the fastest sectors are set) they only had one lap and Buemi screwed hugely their S2 and S3.

As this was a wacky qualifying with red flags, cars not properly setup due to rain in FP3, I cannot know if Mclaren really would have a decent car in a normal circunstance weekend with dry FPs and normal quali. BUT, I MUST ADMIT IT SEEMS THEY IMPROVED A BIT IN THE AERO SIDE as Hamilton was only 10Km/h slower than BMW in Spoon.

BMW CLEARLY had the best downforce as the Spoon Apex Speed showed and S1(sector with many fast corners). Spoon is in S2 but BMWs weren't able to set their best in there due to Buemi, the same goes for S3.

No Surprise seem Hamilton 3th in S3 as this sector only have 130R(flat out) and a slow chincane. wink.gif


dabrasco
lol and u keep digging... I dont need arguments, the result condemns you. Cherry-picking stats here and there only make you look sillier and more ridiculous. The silver donkey was faster around the circuit than your best downforce BMWS in all 3 qualy sessions. You will think that will make a reasonable poster accept his L and keep it moving...but no, apex speed this, sector 1 that... who cares?

baring any anomalies, the silver donkey will be lapping comfortably ahead of your best downforce BMWs tmrw.

I wonder what new rubbish you will write here to justify that
Alonzo
From my predictions only Mclaren been decent was different from it, but as I said, the circunstances weren't the best to know that for sure.

I was right about Toyota, Force India and BMW been strong again, though.
Alonzo
QUOTE (dabrasco @ Oct 3 2009, 10:21) *
The silver donkey was faster around the circuit than your best downforce BMWS in all 3 qualy sessions. You will think that will make a reasonable poster accept his L and keep it moving...but no, apex speed this, sector 1 that... who cares?

Yeah, the circunstances doesn't matter at all. Tomorrow if a huge crash happen in the start and only Alguersuari, Liuzzi, Fisichella remains intact in the race and finish this way making the podium, you'll say Alg had a win on merit?

Ok, let's forget about the S1, Apex Speed info, but I can't forget that only BMWs weren't punished after passing in Buemi's crash, do you know why???
Because they obviously lost time in there compromising their S2 and S3. Not only there were debris on track but the noob Buemi screwed Nicks 130R and Roberts's approach to the final chincane. I'm just saying that potentially Heidfeld had speed to match RBR in Q2 given the data I mentioned.

But in Q3 there is no excuse. Nick only did one lap but I don't if he made a mistake or not. The fact is that Vettel, Trulli and Hamilton did much better jobs in that session.

PS: Afair, in Q1 BMWs used hard tyres and were ahead of Lewis untill he uses soft.
Lokt
14:05:13
2 1:32.417
3 1:38.789
4 1:31.889
5 1:36.619
6 1:31.056

Lewis first stint in Q1. His last lap (witht the hard tyre) was faster then both BMWs.
dabrasco
QUOTE (Alonzo @ Oct 3 2009, 14:26) *
From my predictions only Mclaren been decent was different from it, but as I said, the circunstances weren't the best to know that for sure.

I was right about Toyota, Force India and BMW been strong again, though.


There is no shame in admitting you got it wrong about Mclaren and overestimated BMWs competitiveness, this is what a proper poster would do


all these other excuses is rather sad and pathetic, even Mario Theissen n anyone else in the BMW team will tell you their car isnt the best on the grid for this race...just let it go man.
metz
You have to love Trulli. drunk.gif

Here is what he said in the PC:
"Unfortunately, we are not known as a good starter. I just hope we can have a good start in my race."

Fixed for him:
"Unfortunately, I am not known a good starter. We just hope that I can have a good start in my race."
Cenotaph
lol Alonzo, cmon man.

Seems i wasnt so off the mark after all for considering McLaren as a valid podium contender.
Alonzo
QUOTE (dabrasco @ Oct 3 2009, 11:56) *
There is no shame in admitting you got it wrong about Mclaren and overestimated BMWs competitiveness, this is what a proper poster would do
all these other excuses is rather sad and pathetic, even Mario Theissen n anyone else in the BMW team will tell you their car isnt the best on the grid for this race...just let it go man.

I realize now that RBR is still fastest although I also must admit the new BMW gained downforce, but the car as a whole isn't great.

I'll stop mocking Mclaren, as I got the impression people are disliking me. I'm not here to make trouble. Now considering all that happened this weekend, Hamilton is really a strong podium contender.

PS: If you are interested in another Jarno moment, check this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2zxNnyfSLTk lol or this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyHjy-QJmPU
raiseyourfistfor
Alonzo, I thought you said BMW will have the best aero efficiency (balance of drag and downfoce), not just the best downforce?

I'm sure if McLaren bolted on the Singapore wings and cranked them up to maximum wing angle they could've been very good as well in the turns but in the straights they would've been god awful slow.
Peter Perfect
It's just a thought, but after watching the qualifying chaos...what chance of multiple SCs during the race?

You heard it here first, Rosberg for the win! wink.gif
raiseyourfistfor
QUOTE (Peter Perfect @ Oct 3 2009, 13:17) *
It's just a thought, but after watching the qualifying chaos...what chance of multiple SCs during the race?

You heard it here first, Rosberg for the win! ;)


It depends when the SC comes out, if its during lap 16 , 17 Vettel and Hamilton will gain from it but if its lap 18 then Vettel would lose alot from it.
Alonzo
QUOTE (raiseyourfistfor @ Oct 3 2009, 14:06) *
Alonzo, I thought you said BMW will have the best aero efficiency (balance of drag and downfoce), not just the best downforce?

I'm sure if McLaren bolted on the Singapore wings and cranked them up to maximum wing angle they could've been very good as well in the turns but in the straights they would've been god awful slow.

you are right, I really claimed that. As you said all teams can increase downforce very easily by lifting their wings. The important is aero efficiency and RBR clear is the best in this field. But, again as I said, is hard to take definitive conclusions from this quali because some cars managed to get closer to their best setups than others. I don't know about Mclaren but Heidfeld said that after FP3 he didn't expect much in quali because he couldn't make a proper setup in that session time.
It's not the case here to try to make a point by speculating if this or that car could have gone faster as we'll never know the asnwer for sure. It's just my opinion that Mclaren benefited from the rainy friday because they supposelly(by me) got a good setup as did Toro Rosso which never was so competitive before this season. But don't get mad at me, it's just a hypothesis. wink.gif

QUOTE (Peter Perfect @ Oct 3 2009, 14:17) *
It's just a thought, but after watching the qualifying chaos...what chance of multiple SCs during the race?

You heard it here first, Rosberg for the win! ;)

I think that's what Rosberg is counting on. But the time of the SC must be precise in order to benefit Rosberg.
Atreiu
QUOTE (raiseyourfistfor @ Oct 3 2009, 14:27) *
It depends when the SC comes out, if its during lap 16 , 17 Vettel and Hamilton will gain from it but if its lap 18 then Vettel would lose alot from it.


It should come out on the first lap when guys have cold tyres and lots of optimism.
smile.gif

MegaManson
Easy victory for Hamilton tomorrow will take the lead within first 3 corners with that KERS and will drive into the distance
Craven Morehead
QUOTE (Peter Perfect @ Oct 3 2009, 17:17) *
It's just a thought, but after watching the qualifying chaos...what chance of multiple SCs during the race?

You heard it here first, Rosberg for the win! ;)


Judging on past performances, I'd say that Rosberg has an excellent chance




...of causing a safety car period. wink.gif
dabrasco
QUOTE (MegaManson @ Oct 3 2009, 18:17) *
Easy victory for Hamilton tomorrow will take the lead within first 3 corners with that KERS and will drive into the distance


U are quite an irritating one arent you... I see what you are trying to do...

set him up really high, and when that doesn't happen (which it wont cos the Red Bull car is clearly the best on the track)....you can bash, or try to fool yourself into being happy that Hamilton "lost"
Lazy Prodigy
Hope Kimi can jump everyone infront of him and drive away. He has been quick all weekend.
Alonzo
QUOTE (raiseyourfistfor @ Oct 3 2009, 14:06) *
Alonzo, I thought you said BMW will have the best aero efficiency (balance of drag and downfoce), not just the best downforce?

I'm sure if McLaren bolted on the Singapore wings and cranked them up to maximum wing angle they could've been very good as well in the turns but in the straights they would've been god awful slow.


Actually, BMW's low speed wasn't due to drag, they STUPIDLY had short 7th gear because they were the only idiots who used rain gear ratio in the dry. sad.gif

Check out in this video, Nick tells it to BBC:
http://www.mediafire.com/?ognj0ydn2yy

Nick: "I think the pace isn't bad, but to be honest, I would like to have more top speed. We are the slowest in the ranking, that's not because of the engine because that is strong, but on friday the weather was difficult to predict what was gonna happen, in the end my seventh gear was too short and now it'll be though"

This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2012 Invision Power Services, Inc.