Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: 2010 Silly Season (merged)
The AUTOSPORT Bulletin Board > Forums > Racing Comments
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131
Captain Tightpants
QUOTE (klover @ Sep 8 2009, 21:25) *
What do you mean, who is making an announcement today?

Santander, supposedly. Except that they are not a driver, not a team and probably nothing more than a secondary sponsor for 2010, and so have no right and no business making driver annoucements.
CoolFiltered
QUOTE (Albioncita @ Sep 7 2009, 18:22) *
Jajajaj, no, no. In Spain the women like much, are very Beautiful. It he is like Al Pacino but with fewer hair. love.gif

In Spain it is said that Alonso to Ferrari and Vettel to McLaren and Hamilton to Renault. In England also? smile.gif

Kiss roflmao.gif



He looks more like Al Murray than Al Pacino, have a beer!!

Al Murray
fanboy
QUOTE (Captain Tightpants @ Sep 8 2009, 11:45) *
Yes, well, we have this concept called legally-binding documents or contracts which set out the grounds which each party are to abide to. We don't even know what the terms of those contract are, much less whether or not either party have stuck to them.


And as quickly as possible is 2011. On account of the whole aformentioned legal-document thing.

Its down to ferrari's stupidity that the earliest might be 2011 since hes been available since 2008.

QUOTE (Captain Tightpants @ Sep 8 2009, 11:45) *
Let's see here ... Ferrari's first points of 2009? Raikkonen. Ferrari's first podium. Raikkonen. Ferrari's first win? Raikkonen has that one to his credit, too. Almost all of Kimi's dud results are not his fault and his alone. I'd like to see how Alonso would fare if his team sen him out on extreme wets five laps too soon. When you break it down and eliminate all the races where Raikkonen had problems, there are only two this season that can be put down to the Finn: Turkey and Great Britain. Massa's accident was hardly his fault, was it? And up until then, the Alonso-to-Ferrari people held him up as a shining example of what a Ferrari driver should be. So what changed?
Oh, I know: your desperation.


Alonso wouldnt allow his team to go on wet tyres 5 laps before it rains. What changed? Lack of results, from both drivers. Its already cost them the 08 drivers wc, lets see how much else it costs them.
Odvan
QUOTE
D: Massa e Alonso potrebbero essere il dream team del prossimo anno, ma se tu avessi la terza macchina a chi l'affideresti a Schumi o a Vale?
R: Prima di tutto bisogna vedere se la terza macchina è possibile e poi c'è Kimi che ha un contratto per l'anno prossimo. Schumacher ha già deciso di smettere di correre, che è la cosa più difficile per un pilota, però non si sa mai nella vita. Valentino sarebbe interessante, bisognerebbe vedere però, perché non è facile. Anche Michael è andato a girare in moto, ma non devi solo andare forte, c'è anche l'esperienza che conta.

Q: Massa and Alonso could be the dream team next year, but if you had a third car to those who rely on Schumi or Yale?
A: First you need to see if the third car is possible, and then there's that Kimi has a contract for next year. Schumacher has already decided to stop running, which is the hardest thing for a driver, but you never know in life. Valentino would be interesting, but should be seen, because it is not easy. Michael also went to turn in motion, but you must not only go fast, there's also the experience that counts.

http://www.sportmediaset.it/formula1/artic...colo26389.shtml
fanboy
QUOTE (Celloman @ Sep 8 2009, 12:01) *
Ferrari 2007: WDC, WCC, 9 wins
McLaren 2007: 8 wins

Ferrari 2008: WCC, 8 wins
Renault 2008: 1-2 wins

Ferrari 2009: 1 win, 5 podiums
Renault 2009:

Nothing suggests Alonso would give Ferrari a significant upgrade over their current line-up worth the risk.



Nothing in the data you posted is relevant to your conclusion. For the last 2 years the benchmark for ferrari has been felipe massa. Thats all that needs to be said in a debate as to whether alonso would be an improvement. Go and look at the results between alonso and massa in the years they had comparable cars if your really interested in a honest debate on this topic.
Captain Tightpants
QUOTE (fanboy @ Sep 8 2009, 21:34) *
Its down to ferrari's stupidity that the earliest might be 2011 since hes been available since 2008.

Fernando Alonso doesn't guarantee the team results. You - and the bloody tabloids - talk about him like he's the Second Coming. But if he really is better than Raikkonen, why is Raikkonen in front of him in the overall standings?

QUOTE (fanboy @ Sep 8 2009, 21:34) *
Alonso wouldnt allow his team to go on wet tyres 5 laps before it rains. What changed? Lack of results, from both drivers. Its already cost them the 08 drivers wc, lets see how much else it costs them.

And where was Alonso in the 2008 standings?

For a driver who is supposedly better than them, Alonso sure as hell wasn't anywhere near Raikkonen and Massa.
wasssup bra
QUOTE (Captain Tightpants @ Sep 8 2009, 11:41) *
Fernando Alonso doesn't guarantee the team results. You - and the bloody tabloids - talk about him like he's the Second Coming. But if he really is better than Raikkonen, why is Raikkonen in front of him in the overall standings?


And where was Alonso in the 2008 standings?

For a driver who is supposedly better than them, Alonso sure as hell wasn't anywhere near Raikkonen and Massa.



Different teams, Different cars dude
DarthWillie
QUOTE (Captain Tightpants @ Sep 8 2009, 13:41) *
Fernando Alonso doesn't guarantee the team results. You - and the bloody tabloids - talk about him like he's the Second Coming. But if he really is better than Raikkonen, why is Raikkonen in front of him in the overall standings?


And where was Alonso in the 2008 standings?

For a driver who is supposedly better than them, Alonso sure as hell wasn't anywhere near Raikkonen and Massa.

The same reason Schumacher was nowhere in the 2005 standings, no matter how good you are, with the wrong car you can't do anything.
Captain Tightpants
QUOTE (DarthWillie @ Sep 8 2009, 21:44) *
The same reason Schumacher was nowhere in the 2005 standings, no matter how good you are, with the wrong car you can't do anything.

So, by that logic, Alonso shouldn't drive for Ferrari because the success would come from the car, not the driver. If you were to put Nakajima or Piquet into the Ferrari, they would then produce the same results.
RodrigoL
QUOTE (fanboy @ Sep 8 2009, 12:38) *
Nothing in the data you posted is relevant to your conclusion. For the last 2 years the benchmark for ferrari has been felipe massa. Thats all that needs to be said in a debate as to whether alonso would be an improvement. Go and look at the results between alonso and massa in the years they had comparable cars if your really interested in a honest debate on this topic.


Why not look at this year? Both cars have been comparable in performance, as Alonso himself has admitted.

Raikkonen 34 pts
Massa 22 pts (despite missing 3 GPs so far up.gif)
Alonso 16 pts

Ferrrrnandinho is really showing his worth this year drunk.gif
fanboy
QUOTE (Captain Tightpants @ Sep 8 2009, 12:41) *
And where was Alonso in the 2008 standings?

For a driver who is supposedly better than them, Alonso sure as hell wasn't anywhere near Raikkonen and Massa.



Only 14 points behind Kimi and the same number of race wins despite driving a car leagues inferier the wcc winning car. Is that enough for you? lol.gif
fanboy
QUOTE (Captain Tightpants @ Sep 8 2009, 12:47) *
So, by that logic, Alonso shouldn't drive for Ferrari because the success would come from the car, not the driver. If you were to put Nakajima or Piquet into the Ferrari, they would then produce the same results.


Yes and by your logic the same results as schumacher lol.gif
fanboy
QUOTE (RodrigoL @ Sep 8 2009, 12:48) *
Why not look at this year? Both cars have been comparable in performance, as Alonso himself has admitted.

Raikkonen 34 pts
Massa 22 pts (despite missing 3 GPs so far up.gif)
Alonso 16 pts

Ferrrrnandinho is really showing his worth this year drunk.gif


Im sorry but what evidence is there that they have comparable cars this year? confused.gif
Captain Tightpants
QUOTE (fanboy @ Sep 8 2009, 21:50) *
Only 14 points behind Kimi and the same number of race wins despite driving a car leagues inferier the wcc winning car. Is that enough for you? lol.gif

Nope. Because how many points, podiums and wins have Alonso and Raikkonen racked up this year?

There is nothing tha says Alonso will be, without a doubt, better than Raikkonen at Ferrari. Raikkonen is doing just fine. You are going on a witch-hunt.
Arion
QUOTE (Captain Tightpants @ Sep 8 2009, 11:47) *
So, by that logic, Alonso shouldn't drive for Ferrari because the success would come from the car, not the driver. If you were to put Nakajima or Piquet into the Ferrari, they would then produce the same results.


you forgot Alonso's 0.6 smile.gif
Raj
QUOTE (fanboy @ Sep 8 2009, 16:01) *
If Alonso doesnt go to ferrari next year, then they dont deserve to ever have him and instead deserve to suffer in their current mediocrity for another generation. Only a fool, would not sign up Alonso as quickly as possible. The idea of sticking with a broken down massa and a driver whos no better is seriously mind boggling.


lol.gif lol.gif

Alonso would do no better than Raikkonen. Boy aren't you desperate to see him in a competitive car. If Alonso is so good, he does not need a Ferrari to win.

Funny how just a few seasons ago, Alonso and his fans were against Ferrari. wave.gif
Captain Tightpants
QUOTE (Arion @ Sep 8 2009, 21:56) *
you forgot Alonso's 0.6 smile.gif

No, I just remembered at the beginning of the season where he woul have needed 6.0 to catch Button.
Brawn BGP 001
Somehow I doubt Alonso would do better than 2-3-1 in the previous races.
RodrigoL
QUOTE (fanboy @ Sep 8 2009, 12:52) *
Im sorry but what evidence is there that they have comparable cars this year? confused.gif


Actually you're right. The renault is a complete dog and Ferrrrnandinho is making up all the difference..

But kudos to Kimi and Felipe for developing a better car than Alonso for the third year in a row biggrin.gif
fanboy
QUOTE (Captain Tightpants @ Sep 8 2009, 12:52) *
Nope. Because how many points, podiums and wins have Alonso and Raikkonen racked up this year?

There is nothing tha says Alonso will be, without a doubt, better than Raikkonen at Ferrari. Raikkonen is doing just fine. You are going on a witch-hunt.



You were specifically talking about 2008. I dont blame you for quickly trying to change lanes once I reminded you how much Alonso embaressed Kimi that year, but 2008 proves my case.

Kim is doing just fine because he no longer has an competitive team mate. His team mate had double his points until that point.
BRK
QUOTE (DarthWillie @ Sep 8 2009, 17:44) *
The same reason Schumacher was nowhere in the 2005 standings, no matter how good you are, with the wrong car you can't do anything.


Er,he finished third in 2005.Dock what you will from the USGP that season,Schumacher's never finished a season below 5th in the standings.He didn't race for six freaking races in 99 and ended up third in the championship.Always a scare and a threat in the field.Let's see the same sort of commitment and performance from your boy.
Captain Tightpants
QUOTE (fanboy @ Sep 8 2009, 22:09) *
You were specifically talking about 2008. I dont blame you for quickly trying to change lanes once I reminded you how much Alonso embaressed Kimi that year, but 2008 proves my case.

Yes, because I'm always so embarrassed by another when I beat him at whatever sport we're playing.

Here's a hint: re-register under a new name. Calling yourself 'fanboy' destroys any and all credibility you had or may ever have.
Oho
QUOTE (fanboy @ Sep 8 2009, 04:09) *
Kim is doing just fine because he no longer has an competitive team mate.


What exactly or even generally is the mechanism? There are 22 cars on the grid. In Massa's absence Räikkönen's performances have improved significantly against most if not all of them. Have all other teams or drivers somehow lost the plot to roughly the same degree as a sign of respect perhaps? Räikkönen looks good because Massa is not there simply does not cut the mustard, but troll on.
r4mses
QUOTE (lustigson @ Sep 8 2009, 11:43) *
A new overview, not of all the ifs and buts, but rather my expectation for the 2010 season.

[...]


up.gif
klover
QUOTE (DarthWillie @ Sep 8 2009, 11:44) *
The same reason Schumacher was nowhere in the 2005 standings, no matter how good you are, with the wrong car you can't do anything.

I thought Alonso was the greatest car developer, why was he still nowhere?
Fallout
QUOTE (klover @ Sep 8 2009, 14:55) *
I thought Alonso was the greatest car developer, why was he still nowhere?


Blame it on the engineers I say! Oh wait, that's not allowed .. at least not in Kimi's case. rolleyes.gif
klover
QUOTE (Fallout @ Sep 8 2009, 12:56) *
Blame it on the engineers I say! Oh wait, that's not allowed .. at least not in Kimi's case. rolleyes.gif

No, it makes perfect sense. smile.gif
Tomerell
QUOTE (fanboy @ Sep 8 2009, 15:09) *
You were specifically talking about 2008. I dont blame you for quickly trying to change lanes once I reminded you how much Alonso embaressed Kimi that year, but 2008 proves my case.

Kim is doing just fine because he no longer has an competitive team mate. His team mate had double his points until that point.



And you mean really that Fred is famous of doing well with competitive team mate's confused.gif

You forget one thing, which is that Alonso has ran almost all of his career with 2nd level team mates except Hamilton, and maybe Trulli, and look what happened, he wasn't that extraordinary anymore.

And please tell me how did Alonso embaressed Kimi in 2008, With 2 win's confused.gif One of those is already been questioned... and by having less point's than Kimi confused.gif

Your case is down to toilet already... wave.gif
Fallout
QUOTE (klover @ Sep 8 2009, 14:58) *
No, it makes perfect sense. smile.gif


Indeed. A driver can only do so much. And please, fanboy (not you klover, the guy named fanboy tongue.gif), tell me, why would Ted Kravitz report that the McLaren engineers were thrilled about Raikkonens ability to just arrive in the pits, tell what's wrong with the car and then go faster?

I say, obviously something's wrong with either the car, the tyres or the engineers. Not the driver. I don't believe that for a second. He never ever had a problem at McLaren. wave.gif

And let me remind you that it's the drivers job to drive, the engineers to set up the car so that the driver can drive fast. This can never be disputed.
noikeee
QUOTE (Captain Tightpants @ Sep 8 2009, 13:25) *
Here's a hint: re-register under a new name.


Again? Think he's had enough.
lustigson
I wonder how this thread on the 2010 silly season ended up in a bashing of Alonso/Räikkönen (depening on which way you look at it). rolleyes.gif
Captain Tightpants
QUOTE (lustigson @ Sep 8 2009, 23:16) *
I wonder how this thread on the 2010 silly season ended up in a bashing of Alonso/Räikkönen (depening on which way you look at it). rolleyes.gif

Because everyone assumes that Alonso is the key to unlocking the driver market. And they are kind of right: whichever way he goes, it's going to have repurcussions for the other teams.
lustigson
QUOTE (Captain Tightpants @ Sep 8 2009, 15:18) *
Because everyone assumes that Alonso is the key to unlocking the driver market. And they are kind of right: whichever way he goes, it's going to have repurcussions for the other teams.

True.

The Alonso-Ferrari rumours are a given, though, and the same goes for any movement on this subject is the key to the driver market. But that doesn't have to mean Alonso fans have to bash Räikkönen and vice versa, does it?
Tomerell
QUOTE (lustigson @ Sep 8 2009, 16:16) *
I wonder how this thread on the 2010 silly season ended up in a bashing of Alonso/Räikkönen (depening on which way you look at it). rolleyes.gif



Well they are the two best drivers most likely to switch the team in 2010, and some of the comment's from the Spanish Armada were so hilarious that you just could not help getting out of the topic.


Back to the silly season 2010 guy's hop hop...
Mandzipop
So what day do we expect the announcement? Friday, Saturday or Sunday?
klover
QUOTE (Mandzipop @ Sep 8 2009, 14:33) *
So what day do we expect the announcement? Friday, Saturday or Sunday?

The announcement will come on Day Z, if not, then on Day Z+1, for sure roflmao.gif
kismet
Yes, ideally we'd all behave ourselves but it's not often a top team fires a driver, let alone a WDC, for basically being a bit shit. It really seems too good an opportunity to miss.

But anyway... This is all so very, very boooooring. Someone really should just sign/announce something. Set the goddamn ball rolling already! I'm going to keel over from sheer boredom if I need to wait until bloody Christmas for Ferrari/Alonso/whomever to make up their minds. I don't care about them, I want to know what'll happen to everyone else!
klover
QUOTE (Fallout @ Sep 8 2009, 14:06) *
Indeed. A driver can only do so much. And please, fanboy (not you klover, the guy named fanboy tongue.gif), tell me, why would Ted Kravitz report that the McLaren engineers were thrilled about Raikkonens ability to just arrive in the pits, tell what's wrong with the car and then go faster?

I say, obviously something's wrong with either the car, the tyres or the engineers. Not the driver. I don't believe that for a second. He never ever had a problem at McLaren. wave.gif

And let me remind you that it's the drivers job to drive, the engineers to set up the car so that the driver can drive fast. This can never be disputed.

Indeed, Peter Windsor reported way back in 2006 that according to McLaren engineers Kimi's feedback was very precise, that piece from Ted Kravitz only confirms what was previously said. Unless both of them made it up. However the fanboys know nothing better than "Kimi cannot develop cars, Kimi is lazy and eats icecream instead of working out, Kimi cannot set up his car, etc." They have repeated it among themselves so many times that they believe it's true. I don't know what the reality is for I have never worked in either Kimi's or Fernando's garage but I suspect they are not that apart when it comes to feedback to the engineers and also their role in the development of the car is far less than the Spanish Armada fanboy choir would have us believe, at least in the Prince Nando's case.
Captain Tightpants
QUOTE (lustigson @ Sep 8 2009, 23:20) *
The Alonso-Ferrari rumours are a given, though, and the same goes for any movement on this subject is the key to the driver market. But that doesn't have to mean Alonso fans have to bash Räikkönen and vice versa, does it?

First of all, this is the internet. Welcome.

Secondly, you can kind of see where both parties are coming from. The pro-Alonso people want to see him in a Ferrari because they think he'll be good for the team, that he can get another World Championship if he races for them. The pro-Kimi party want to see Raikkonen remain at the Scuderia because they're having a hard time justifying Ferrari dismissing him based on hisresults alone.

But, as with all arguments, there are more forceful sides. The extreme pro-Alonso side takes issue with the fact tha Kimi likes to have a good time, that his personality doesn't "fit in" with Ferrari the way Massa's does, and seem to take the word of all the tabloids and rumour-mongers; when enough people start saying something, it's generally true if you know how to sort it all out properly, but since every rumour can be traced back to the Spanish tabloids, the extreme pro-Kimi supporters take issue with it and heads duly butt.
FENIX
QUOTE (FENIX @ Sep 7 2009, 15:33) *
Im just telling what will happen tomorrow, what are the plans right now, that is the information i got this morning from an insider. If its not tomorrow it will be on Wednesday, Thursday... who cares, blame me if you want but Ferrari will announce Alonso this week. 100% sure.



Announcement is scheduled at 1800 on ferrari and FA websites. Don't know if it is still valid at this moment or not, sorry.

QUOTE (FENIX @ Sep 7 2009, 15:10) *
Don't worry, It could be that Massa will not be ready to race next year, or maybe Ferrari will race 3 cars next season... afaik nothing was said about the future of kimi or felipe, i don't know their plans.


Today i can confirm that Kimi won't drive for Ferrari next season (yeah, most of you already know it). Sorry Kimi fans.

BTW, you can trust me or not, i really dont care. kiss.gif
engel
Apologies for interrupting the rollercoaster ... but Haug confirmed they are talking to Rosberg apparently, whatever bearing that has on the 2010 silly season
http://www.planet-f1.com/story/0,18954,3213_5544346,00.html
wasssup bra
QUOTE (FENIX @ Sep 8 2009, 13:48) *
Announcement is scheduled at 1800 on ferrari and FA websites. Don't know if it is still valid at this moment or not, sorry.



Today i can confirm that Kimi won't drive for Ferrari next season (yeah, most of you already know it). Sorry Kimi fans.

BTW, you can trust me or not, i really dont care. kiss.gif


Thanks dude, I thought so as well but when i said it i was hounded around here with insults
BRK
I hope he moves to Macca,should pay off in the long run.That'd leave the door open for the other Nico-game on.
Odvan
QUOTE (Mandzipop @ Sep 8 2009, 17:33) *
So what day do we expect the announcement? Friday, Saturday or Sunday?

All are extremely quiet now. I think Friday or Sunday after race. In any case it ends soon - Ferrari will announce Alonso or keep Kimi for 2010. Silence will indicate some backroom deal with high chances to see Alonso in red car next year.
mclarenplayer
QUOTE (FENIX @ Sep 8 2009, 14:48) *
Announcement is scheduled at 1800 on ferrari and FA websites. Don't know if it is still valid at this moment or not, sorry.



Today i can confirm that Kimi won't drive for Ferrari next season (yeah, most of you already know it). Sorry Kimi fans.

BTW, you can trust me or not, i really dont care. kiss.gif

Let‘s just wait and see... up.gif
klover
QUOTE (FENIX @ Sep 8 2009, 14:48) *
Announcement is scheduled at 1800 on ferrari and FA websites. Don't know if it is still valid at this moment or not, sorry.



Today i can confirm that Kimi won't drive for Ferrari next season (yeah, most of you already know it). Sorry Kimi fans.

BTW, you can trust me or not, i really dont care. kiss.gif

1800 on what day?
Korben82
QUOTE (FENIX @ Sep 8 2009, 15:48) *
Announcement is scheduled at 1800 on ferrari and FA websites. Don't know if it is still valid at this moment or not, sorry.


At 18:00 GMT? Which day, today?
Fallout
QUOTE (FENIX @ Sep 8 2009, 15:48) *
Today i can confirm that Kimi won't drive for Ferrari next season (yeah, most of you already know it). Sorry Kimi fans.

BTW, you can trust me or not, i really dont care. kiss.gif


How is it that you can confirm that? Are you indeed a Ferrari insider?

And don't say sorry, most of us Kimi fans haven't exactly been enjoying his Ferrari time. Come back McLaren! clap.gif
mclarenplayer
QUOTE (Fallout @ Sep 8 2009, 15:29) *
How is it that you can confirm that? Are you indeed a Ferrari insider?

And don't say sorry, most of us Kimi fans haven't exactly been enjoying his Ferrari time. Come back McLaren! clap.gif


QUOTE
Apologies for interrupting the rollercoaster ... but Haug confirmed they are talking to Rosberg apparently, whatever bearing that has on the 2010 silly season
http://www.planet-f1.com/story/0,18954,3213_5544346,00.html


Bad news...Haug prefer Nico to Kimi...wink.gif
Fallout
QUOTE (mclarenplayer @ Sep 8 2009, 16:31) *
Bad news...Haug prefer Nico to Kimi...;)


Where did he state that? confused.gif He said that they were in talks with Nico, what you state is BS. wave.gif

And he didn't deny that they were in talks with Kimi, ergo that means nothing. smile.gif
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2012 Invision Power Services, Inc.