Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: 2010 Silly Season (merged)
The AUTOSPORT Bulletin Board > Forums > Racing Comments
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131
wtoyzz
confused.gif confused.gif

what will happen next?
tom
Sad too say, i've just been searching for news on jv, and he says his chances of finding a drive are slim. Guess we knew that but i kinda hoped the old tiger had a trick up his sleeve.
bladesblood
QUOTE (tom @ Jan 12 2010, 08:23) *
Sad too say, i've just been searching for news on jv, and he says his chances of finding a drive are slim. Guess we knew that but i kinda hoped the old tiger had a trick up his sleeve.



Yep, me too ohwell.gif
TheF1PERSON
I have a feeling that once all the seats are filled and JV isn't in one of them, he will criticise the teams and swear or something.
Andrew Hope
It's hard to feel too much sympathy for anyone that doesn't get a drive because of salary demands. The list of things I wouldn't do to drive an unpaid season in F1 is a very, very short one.
alecc
QUOTE (andrew. @ Jan 12 2010, 20:30) *
It's hard to feel too much sympathy for anyone that doesn't get a drive because of salary demands. The list of things I wouldn't do to drive an unpaid season in F1 is a very, very short one.


If it is a short one, then way you don't wrote it here? drunk.gif
rodlamas
Kovalainen (on an interview at formula1.com) is saying that Lotus will only joing the test grid on the 3rd group session.
Arion
QUOTE (alecc @ Jan 12 2010, 19:42) *
If it is a short one, then way you don't wrote it here? drunk.gif


what's the "drunk" smiley about?

Captain Tightpants
QUOTE (TheF1PERSON @ Jan 13 2010, 06:28) *
I have a feeling that once all the seats are filled and JV isn't in one of them, he will criticise the teams and swear or something.

No, he'll just write a song about it.
tom
If he swears it'd be fair enough, they're hiring new lakeys that are bound to make plenty of mistakes, he's a damn good driver on old tyres, especially with slicks back, it'll suit the old dogs bigtime. Cant believe no teams had any faith in him.
Muz Bee
QUOTE (tom @ Jan 13 2010, 17:01) *
If he swears it'd be fair enough, they're hiring new lakeys that are bound to make plenty of mistakes, he's a damn good driver on old tyres, especially with slicks back, it'll suit the old dogs bigtime. Cant believe no teams had any faith in him.

Or Nigel, or Nelson Sr! smile.gif
Captain Tightpants
Virgin rebrands Cosworth engines as Marussia:

http://www.grandprix.com/ns/ns22026.html
Slowinfastout
QUOTE (Captain Tightpants @ Jan 12 2010, 23:19) *
Virgin rebrands Cosworth engines as Marussia:

http://www.grandprix.com/ns/ns22026.html


Weird...
Captain Tightpants
QUOTE (Slowinfastout @ Jan 13 2010, 16:31) *
Weird...

I don't think so. It struck me as odd that Virgin had Marussia as a partner despite the fact that they were running Cosworth engines, so I kind of expected something like this.
Slowinfastout
QUOTE (Captain Tightpants @ Jan 13 2010, 01:31) *
I don't think so. It struck me as odd that Virgin had Marussia as a partner despite the fact that they were running Cosworth engines, so I kind of expected something like this.


Yeah, better than if the engine was re-branded after their other partner Carbon Green, I guess... now that would've been more like a sex change, a shame for a virgin, uninformed decisions and stuff.. drunk.gif

edit: I just checked their website and learned that the Marussia road cars have Cosworth 3.5l V6s... nice touch! lol.gif I'm secretly thankful they didn't dish out more money and re-branded ALL the Cosworth F1 engines though..
Dolph
QUOTE (Captain Tightpants @ Jan 13 2010, 06:19) *
Virgin rebrands Cosworth engines as Marussia:

http://www.grandprix.com/ns/ns22026.html



That's ridiculous. I can understand PLAYLIFE renaming Supertec engines as they are not an engine manufacturer but want more exposure. I can understand Mercedes rebaging Ilmor engines as they financed them and the Ilmor engines were only for McLaren and specifically developed to for the Mercedes brand. But I can't understand Marussia renaming run of the mill Cosworths that four other teams are using. Like we are to believe Marussia is the engine manufacturer!? That's cheap...
Captain Tightpants
QUOTE (Slowinfastout @ Jan 13 2010, 17:46) *
Yeah, better than if the engine was re-branded after their other partner Carbon Green, I guess... now that would've been more like a sex change, a shame for a virgin, uninformed decisions and stuff.. drunk.gif

edit: I just checked their website and learned that the Marussia road cars have Cosworth 3.5l V6s... nice touch! lol.gif I'm secretly thankful they didn't dish out more money and re-branded ALL the Cosworth F1 engines though..

To be honest, I don't think many of them would be overly-interested. It costs an extra one and a half million pounds to do it, which is apparently how much Marussia paid Virgin. So Virgin are really getting the re-branding for free. But as for the other teams, what would they rename to? Lotus are the only ones who could reasonably do it and go from Lotus-Cosworth to Lotus-Proton, or maybe just Lotus, but the first would only serve to cheapen the team and the second might step on a few peoples' toes. After all, they've said they don't want to be pretenders and take from the history of the Lotus name in motorsports, but add to it instead. USF1 don't really have any close affiliation with anyone who could reasonably be a candidate for the re-branding, and nor do Williams. As for Campos, I reckon they should rename the engine the Meta, because Gazprom (/PDVSA) Campos Meta1-Cosworth is quite possible the most inane and odd-sounding name in the sixty years of Formula 1; Gazprom Campos-Meta sounds far better. But if times are as hard on the Campos farm as we've been led to believe, the one and a half million pounds for rebranding rights is probably a luxury.

QUOTE (Dolph @ Jan 13 2010, 18:19) *
That's ridiculous. I can understand PLAYLIFE renaming Supertec engines as they are not an engine manufacturer but want more exposure. I can understand Mercedes rebaging Ilmor engines as they financed them and the Ilmor engines were only for McLaren and specifically developed to for the Mercedes brand. But I can't understand Marussia renaming run of the mill Cosworths that four other teams are using. Like we are to believe Marussia is the engine manufacturer!? That's cheap...

How is the Marussia situation any different to PLAYLIFE? They want more exposure, and they've apparently bankrolled the whole thing. It doesn't cost Virgin a cent, but Cosworth get their money. Marussia get their exposure as a fledgling supercar manufacturer, and everyone wins. I'd say Cosworth might have reservations about it if they were only supplying Virgin, but there's four other teams carrying Cosworths this season. It's not like they're going to lose a fortune in coverage for it.
lustigson
2 Minor updates to Virgin Racing:

Virgin Racing
Virgin VR-01 – Marussia CA2010
Team Principal: John Booth ; Technical Director: Nick Wirth
24. Timo Glock (2-year deal with an option for a 3rd)
25. Lucas Di Grassi (how long a deal?)
Captain Tightpants
I don't think the Marussia will be branded as the Marussia CA2010. That's a Cosworth designation, after all.
lustigson
QUOTE (Captain Tightpants @ Jan 13 2010, 08:29) *
As for Campos, I reckon they should rename the engine the Meta, because Gazprom (/PDVSA) Campos Meta1-Cosworth is quite possible the most inane and odd-sounding name in the sixty years of Formula 1; Gazprom Campos-Meta sounds far better. But if times are as hard on the Campos farm as we've been led to believe, the one and a half million pounds for rebranding rights is probably a luxury.

Judging from the FIA's entry list, both Campos' cars and their engines could have been named 'Campos Dallara', resulting in a Campos Dallara/Campos Dallara combination. That's much like Ferrari, which is, strictly speaking, a Ferrari/Ferrari, of course, hence the appearance of just 'Campos Dallara' on that list.

I'm not at all sure about this, though. wink.gif

QUOTE (Captain Tightpants @ Jan 13 2010, 08:37) *
I don't think the Marussia will be branded as the Marussia CA2010. That's a Cosworth designation, after all.

Me neither, but I have to put in something, don't I? smile.gif

What's the engine designation for the road car? That's a Cosworth unit, too, I understand.

Edit: according to the Russian wikipedia, the engines are currently a Renault-Nissan unit, but a Cosworth replacement is allegedly announced.
Captain Tightpants
I just found these over at F1 Fanatic and thought this was as good a place as any to show them. They were made by the user Jezson, and I'm sure he won't mind if I parade his works here under his name for you all to admire. They're a pair of Toro Rosso mock-ups, one for Red Bull Sugarfree and one for Repsol YPF, and you can find them here. Someone give this man a job designing liveries!

QUOTE (lustigson @ Jan 13 2010, 18:38) *
What's the engine designation for the road car? That's a Cosworth unit, too, I understand.

I don't know. I can read a little Russian, but it's too advanced for me.
Nustang70
QUOTE (Dolph @ Jan 13 2010, 07:19) *
That's ridiculous. I can understand PLAYLIFE renaming Supertec engines as they are not an engine manufacturer but want more exposure. I can understand Mercedes rebaging Ilmor engines as they financed them and the Ilmor engines were only for McLaren and specifically developed to for the Mercedes brand. But I can't understand Marussia renaming run of the mill Cosworths that four other teams are using. Like we are to believe Marussia is the engine manufacturer!? That's cheap...



Ferrari=>Petronas?
Slowinfastout
QUOTE (Nustang70 @ Jan 13 2010, 02:46) *
Ferrari=>Petronas?


Ferrari=>Acer?
lustigson
QUOTE (Captain Tightpants @ Jan 13 2010, 08:46) *
I don't know. I can read a little Russian, but it's too advanced for me.

I can't read cyrrilic either, but Google Translate helps...
Captain Tightpants
QUOTE (lustigson @ Jan 13 2010, 18:59) *

Google ranslate helps, but I like showing off.
Empy
Senna could switch to Toro Rosso for 2010 - reports
http://www.motorsport.com/news/article.asp...54914&FS=F1
Muzzinho
QUOTE (Captain Tightpants @ Jan 13 2010, 08:46) *
I just found these over at F1 Fanatic and thought this was as good a place as any to show them. They were made by the user Jezson, and I'm sure he won't mind if I parade his works here under his name for you all to admire. They're a pair of Toro Rosso mock-ups, one for Red Bull Sugarfree and one for Repsol YPF, and you can find them here. Someone give this man a job designing liveries!


I don't know. I can read a little Russian, but it's too advanced for me.



Wow. Those mock up Repsol and Sugarfree liverys are great. Much better than the lame copy of Red Bull racing liverys that Toro rosso normally run. That light blue one would be fantastic.
lustigson
QUOTE (Empy @ Jan 13 2010, 10:10) *
Senna could switch to Toro Rosso for 2010 - reports
http://www.motorsport.com/news/article.asp...54914&FS=F1

I've learnt to be weary of GMM 'news', but there is some logic in this.

However:
QUOTE
People speak too much and make trouble for us. We are talking with people who would like to be shareholders. We are looking for investors and sponsors but the project is very much alive. I don't want to sell my part of the team and I will remain the team principal. The condition to be a shareholder is to accept all the existing contracts.
— Adrián Campos Suñer, Campos Meta 1, 12 January, to BBC Sport

And:
QUOTE
[Claims that Campos is behind in payments] not true, not from our side at least. We are still proceeding to build the car and it has passed its crash tests.
Andrea Pontremoli, Dallara Automobili, 12 January, to BBC Sport (through Pitpass)
Captain Tightpants
QUOTE (Empy @ Jan 13 2010, 20:10) *
Senna could switch to Toro Rosso for 2010 - reports
http://www.motorsport.com/news/article.asp...54914&FS=F1

Unlikely. The Brazilian press tend to believe everything they hear about Brazilian drivers. Since Campos' situation is nowhere enar as dire as it has been made out to be, Senna will probably stay.
lustigson
" The cars will not be officially named Virgin-Marussia", says Joe Saward.
highdownforce
I've posted it at the Campos thread but it has a place here too:

QUOTE
"Nonsense. Those news have no sense at all. Bruno will run the first race of the F1 Season in Bahrain for Campos," said Marcio Fonseca, the driver's advisor.
[ GrandePremio ]
THE "driverider"
Goodbye BMW and Toyota, hello Marussia. Still it will good for this company to have its name in Formula One, like Lada in WTCC (but a little different).
lustigson
QUOTE (THE @ Jan 13 2010, 14:33) *
Goodbye BMW and Toyota, hello Marussia. Still it will good for this company to have its name in Formula One, like Lada in WTCC (but a little different).

Allow me to quote myself (emphasis added):
QUOTE (lustigson @ Jan 13 2010, 13:11) *
"The cars will not be officially named Virgin-Marussia", says Joe Saward.

wink.gif
Dolph
QUOTE (Nustang70 @ Jan 13 2010, 09:46) *
Ferrari=>Petronas?


QUOTE (Slowinfastout @ Jan 13 2010, 09:54) *
Ferrari=>Acer?


Yeah, but Acer, Petronas nor PLAYLIFE were car manufacturers. Marussia is. Wouldn't you find it odd if Chevrolet rebranded one of the cosworth units...

The difference that I'm pointing out and you are not getting is that if the team is successful nobody will think that "hey, that Acer/Petronas/PLAYLIFE sure makes good engines/cars". However, they will think that "hey, that Marussia sure makes good engines/cars".
lustigson
QUOTE (Dolph @ Jan 13 2010, 15:25) *
Wouldn't you find it odd if Chevrolet rebranded one of the cosworth units...

Not at all. They actually did so during the 2003 (and subsequent seasons?) in the IndyCar Series. cool.gif
sir jackie walker
I think car manifacturers rebadge engines (or even whole cars) quite customarily. Vauxhall Astra, for example.

And what about the so called "Ford" engines that have claimed 176 Grand Prix victories?
Kirill25
Marussia is russian name (like Mary). So "Virgin Marussia"... It sounds amazing))
lustigson
QUOTE (Kirill25 @ Jan 13 2010, 17:40) *
Marussia is russian name (like Mary). So "Virgin Marussia"... It sounds amazing))

You mean... 'Virgin Mary'? eek.gif
rodlamas
By the way, Autosport says Virgin will joing the 2nd group test on the 10th of February at Jerez and that the car will run for the first time on a Silverstone shakedown in between the 3rd and the 5th of February.
sir jackie walker
Damn those lousy transliterations! Kirill25 made me realize Marussia is supposed to mean Marusya, diminutive of Mariya.

Yep, why not Bogoroditsa Racing?
ezequiel
QUOTE (Dolph @ Jan 13 2010, 15:25) *
Yeah, but Acer, Petronas nor PLAYLIFE were car manufacturers. Marussia is. Wouldn't you find it odd if Chevrolet rebranded one of the cosworth units...

The difference that I'm pointing out and you are not getting is that if the team is successful nobody will think that "hey, that Acer/Petronas/PLAYLIFE sure makes good engines/cars". However, they will think that "hey, that Marussia sure makes good engines/cars".



Weren't the Ford-Cosworth engines in Minardi renamed as Fondmetal-Ford in 2000 and European in 2001?
senna da silva
QUOTE (rodlamas @ Jan 13 2010, 17:50) *
By the way, Autosport says Virgin will joing the 2nd group test on the 10th of February at Jerez and that the car will run for the first time on a Silverstone shakedown in between the 3rd and the 5th of February.


With all of the management changes and now this delay in testing it sounds like Virgin are having some serious issues and it could be likely they never make it off the ground.
Captain Tightpants
QUOTE (senna da silva @ Jan 14 2010, 13:11) *
With all of the management changes and now this delay in testing it sounds like Virgin are having some serious issues and it could be likely they never make it off the ground.

Jesus, you people will take any excuse to doubt a team, won't you? Virgin made one change, and while it might have been a major change, it was just one. Singular. Not the plural you're making it out to be.
senna da silva
QUOTE (Captain Tightpants @ Jan 14 2010, 02:15) *
Jesus, you people will take any excuse to doubt a team, won't you? Virgin made one change, and while it might have been a major change, it was just one. Singular. Not the plural you're making it out to be.


Plus they're based in Yorkshire! roflmao.gif They might as well be in Burkina Faso.
Andrew Hope
I only really lurked in the Nostalgia Forum last year, was this place as depressingly cynical in years previous when we got new teams?
ryan86
We've only had two bona fide new teams since 2000 if I am correct, Toyota in 2002 and Super Aguri in 2006. Toyota were always going to make it and with Super Aguri they openly admitted they'd start the season with a modified 2002 Arrows.
Dolph
QUOTE (lustigson @ Jan 13 2010, 16:46) *
Not at all. They actually did so during the 2003 (and subsequent seasons?) in the IndyCar Series. cool.gif


At least then they had the decency to rebrand all of the engines. Not just two cars.
tom
Any more news on Villeneuve?
Captain Tightpants
Nope, nothing.
lustigson
QUOTE (Dolph @ Jan 14 2010, 08:05) *
At least then they had the decency to rebrand all of the engines. Not just two cars.

True. Although I reckon that was due to a different engine concept in IndyCar, the fact that, IIRC, Chevrolet ordered the engines from Cosworth prior to badging them, compared to F1's team-by-team engine concept, as well as the Cosworth deals already being in place prior to the now refuted engine badging.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2012 Invision Power Services, Inc.