Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Williams agrrement with Renault
The AUTOSPORT Bulletin Board > Forums > Racing Comments
DePortago
Aren´t you excited about the possibility of a Williams-Renault team for next season?
Dolph
QUOTE (DePortago @ Oct 6 2009, 20:03) *
Aren´t you excited about the possibility of a Williams-Renault team for next season?


I'm not that nostalgical.
The Ragged Edge
QUOTE (DePortago @ Oct 6 2009, 18:03) *
Aren´t you excited about the possibility of a Williams-Renault team for next season?


Source?
Dolph
QUOTE (The Ragged Edge @ Oct 6 2009, 20:07) *
Source?


What source??? If they are dumping Toyota, Merc is not an option and they don't want Cosworth the only real options are Renault and Ferrari. So its either one or the other and by that logic the "possibility" is pretty freakin high. So what source do you need again?
The Ragged Edge
QUOTE (Dolph @ Oct 6 2009, 18:11) *
What source??? If they are dumping Toyota, Merc is not an option and they don't want Cosworth the only real options are Renault and Ferrari. So its either one or the other and by that logic the "possibility" is pretty freakin high. So what source do you need again?


I've heard a ton of rumours, but nothing is concrete yet.
raiseyourfistfor
Renault are not what they use to be with their engines so it's not that big of a deal
benn5325
QUOTE (raiseyourfistfor @ Oct 6 2009, 06:14) *
Renault are not what they use to be with their engines so it's not that big of a deal

Yeah, Red Bull have made no use of that lump have they
Jackmancer
Williams with Ferrari engine, now that would be nostalgic.
Louis Mr. F1
QUOTE (benn5325 @ Oct 6 2009, 21:21) *
Yeah, Red Bull have made no use of that lump have they


clap.gif exactly, Red Bull has only scored 4 victories with the Renault engine this year, that's nothing. clap.gif
supasd
QUOTE (DePortago @ Oct 6 2009, 19:03) *
Aren´t you excited about the possibility of a Williams-Renault team for next season?

sounds pretty good, but wouldn't change anything... probably more engine failures, but no performance increase.
Crestie
QUOTE (supasd @ Oct 6 2009, 18:46) *
sounds pretty good, but wouldn't change anything... probably more engine failures, but no performance increase.

Yep, I've lost count of how many engines have let go on Fernando, Romain and Nelson this year.
supasd
QUOTE (Crestie @ Oct 6 2009, 19:50) *
Yep, I've lost count of how many engines have let go on Fernando, Romain and Nelson this year.

thats why I just said probably. Vettel was a bit unlucky.
Crestie
QUOTE (supasd @ Oct 6 2009, 18:57) *
thats why I just said probably. Vettel was a bit unlucky.


Removing my sarcasm for a second, assuming Williams don't 'borrow' the engine cover design from RedBull they should be fine. It's just too skinny to cool the RS27 effectively I reckon.
rayyu882
QUOTE (DePortago @ Oct 6 2009, 13:03) *
Aren´t you excited about the possibility of a Williams-Renault team for next season?


If next season is 1992... Yes!
DePortago
If that becomes truth, let´s hope Williams make a good car, although the "powered" rs27 engine in not as reliable as it used to be. Williams-Renault was a very successful connection, it would be sad to see them crawling.
Owen
QUOTE (DePortago @ Oct 6 2009, 18:03) *
Aren´t you excited about the possibility of a Williams-Renault team for next season?

It's the bland leading the bland.
britishtrident
Oh golly gosh all so exciting I nearly wet myself.
With all the Williams tantrums of late I am surprise any FOTA engine engine supplier wants to deal with them -- let them eat Cosworth.


Dolph
QUOTE (Owen @ Oct 6 2009, 22:00) *
It's the bland leading the bland.


...says the guy with a McLaren in his avatar roflmao.gif
glorius&victorius
QUOTE (Jackmancer @ Oct 6 2009, 18:28) *
Williams with Ferrari engine, now that would be nostalgic.


and then beating their engine suppliers... now that would be hilarious
George Costanza
Brilliant... Glory Days return. tongue.gif
pgj
If we do sign to use Renault engines we will get a very good engine. I would be very excited if we were not using V8's though. We have more experience of V10's with Renault. So the characteristics of the engine will be an unknown quantity to us.
Muz Bee
QUOTE (Dolph @ Oct 6 2009, 21:57) *
...says the guy with a McLaren in his avatar roflmao.gif

Meaning confused.gif

On topic - what's to be nostalgic about Williams Renault? Seeing a Williams pair both on the podium, that would be something to be nostalgic about! Since they can't afford a top driver and Rosberg appears to be on his way somewhere else I don't see them soaring to the top of the constructors championship anytime soon. Sadly.
V8 Fireworks
QUOTE (Muz Bee @ Oct 6 2009, 21:49) *
Meaning confused.gif


Because McLaren are a bland and most corporate of teams, heavy in Ron-speak.

Toyota may be dull... but at least they don't have three layers of management and thus stumble to do things like: take laps too long to decide to fit wet tyres, have a pit-stop without bringing the tyres out of the garage etc...
Nathan
QUOTE (raiseyourfistfor @ Oct 6 2009, 09:14) *
Renault are not what they use to be with their engines so it's not that big of a deal

Is there a way I arrange this persons post to not appear on my screen?
QUOTE (pgj @ Oct 6 2009, 13:47) *
the characteristics of the engine will be an unknown quantity to us.

Apparantly so it designing a winning chassis. smoking.gif

I like nostalgia, I like this.
Exar Kun
Back in 2006 I liked the sound of going back to Williams-Cosworth. I hope a Williams-Renault partnership turns out to be just a little bit more successful.
Callisto
QUOTE (raiseyourfistfor @ Oct 6 2009, 18:14) *
Renault are not what they use to be with their engines so it's not that big of a deal

so how did vettel win on sunday then?
lbennie
QUOTE (Callisto @ Oct 6 2009, 23:17) *
so how did vettel win on sunday then?


because suzuka is such an engine track isn't it rolleyes.gif

the renault block is weak as piss, RB would have run away with things this year if they'd had a merc in the back
Just waiting
QUOTE (Callisto @ Oct 6 2009, 18:17) *
so how did vettel win on sunday then?

Superior areo and great handling.....with the tires and car set up that worked great for that track surface at that track temperature......and a Renault engine that did not blow up up.gif up.gif up.gif like the others down.gif ..... .......of course i could include the driver tongue.gif
JarnoA
QUOTE (lbennie @ Oct 7 2009, 00:39) *
because suzuka is such an engine track isn't it rolleyes.gif

the renault block is weak as piss, RB would have run away with things this year if they'd had a merc in the back


Because obviously, Monaco for example, is such an engine track, isn't it?

If the Renault block was so bad, it wouldn't have won 4 races. The fact is that Newey makes cars that destroy engines. How many engine failures have Alonso, PK, or RG had?

Red Bull have a fast car at the expense of reliability. Just like the McLaren of 2005.

You could put a Merc, Renault, Toyota, Cosworth, Ferrari or any other engine in the RB. It would win races, but blow engines because of Newey's design's.
Muz Bee
QUOTE (V8 Fireworks @ Oct 6 2009, 23:19) *
Because McLaren are a bland and most corporate of teams, heavy in Ron-speak.

Toyota may be dull... but at least they don't have three layers of management and thus stumble to do things like: take laps too long to decide to fit wet tyres, have a pit-stop without bringing the tyres out of the garage etc...

Oh!
And they have a large collection of cars which go back to the first car - an Austin - which Bruce McLaren raced. I think they have every bit of passion of any of the teams. They have had some of the nicest cars, paint jobs, drivers, wins, failures. They are part and parcel of the DNA of F1. Yes Ron dennis is somewhat of a bland personality - he started his career as a mechanic - but so what? McLaren are more than the sum of their parts, like Williams, they contain a large dollop of F1 tradition and competitive spirit.

Your last set of comments could be applied to any team in F1 - human errors occur at every team including the beloved Scuderia Ferrari. The three wheeled Ferrari or Renault, the fuel hose which made it all the way to the end of pitlane etc....

I don't dislike any team although there have been times when it has been hard to love Ferrari in the Schumacher era.
wewantourdarbyback
QUOTE (britishtrident @ Oct 6 2009, 21:11) *
With all the Williams tantrums of late


Like?

KERS - never said they were going to use just that they were to develop it, remember it would be a good external business for them.
14th team - They weren't the only team who objected to it.
Signing up for next season - Ensured the team survived.

Captain Tightpants
QUOTE (DePortago @ Oct 7 2009, 04:03) *
Aren´t you excited about the possibility of a Williams-Renault team for next season?

Not really. While the Renault engine as been better than their current Toyota units, it's still not as good as the Mercedes ones.
George Costanza
QUOTE (JarnoA @ Oct 6 2009, 20:01) *
Because obviously, Monaco for example, is such an engine track, isn't it?

If the Renault block was so bad, it wouldn't have won 4 races. The fact is that Newey makes cars that destroy engines. How many engine failures have Alonso, PK, or RG had?

Red Bull have a fast car at the expense of reliability. Just like the McLaren of 2005.

You could put a Merc, Renault, Toyota, Cosworth, Ferrari or any other engine in the RB. It would win races, but blow engines because of Newey's design's.


Explain to me that how did Newey's designs win with Williams from 1992 to 1997?
lbennie
QUOTE (JarnoA @ Oct 7 2009, 00:01) *
Because obviously, Monaco for example, is such an engine track, isn't it?


i don't see your point here

QUOTE (JarnoA @ Oct 7 2009, 00:01) *
If the Renault block was so bad, it wouldn't have won 4 races.


i said weak, not bad, slight difference there

look at the starting grid for monza (which is THE engine track)
1 Lewis Hamilton McLaren-Mercedes
2 Adrian Sutil Force India-Mercedes
3 Kimi Räikkönen Ferrari
4 Heikki Kovalainen McLaren-Mercedes
5 Rubens Barrichello Brawn-Mercedes
6 Jenson Button Brawn-Mercedes
7 Vitantonio Liuzzi Force India-Mercedes
8 Fernando Alonso Renault
9 Sebastian Vettel RBR-Renault
10 Mark Webber RBR-Renault

see a pattern there? (fred had kers btw)
that is every single merc car on the grid in the top 7, and with the current engine freeze regs, that is a joke (i don't care whos fault it is, merc's, fia's, dodgy regulations, but it's and effing joke)

QUOTE (JarnoA @ Oct 7 2009, 00:01) *
The fact is that Newey makes cars that destroy engines. How many engine failures have Alonso, PK, or RG had?
Red Bull have a fast car at the expense of reliability. Just like the McLaren of 2005.


Im talking pure performance here, not reliablity.
but your right, its obvious the tight packaging on the rb5 has compromised cooling somewhat, which has had a major effect on the championship.
but performance wise, the renault has fallen well short this year. (and could possibly be contributing to the cooling problems - look at the massive cooling holes at the rear of the renault, are they compromising aero too much because the engine is too hot?)


QUOTE (JarnoA @ Oct 7 2009, 00:01) *
You could put a Merc, Renault, Toyota, Cosworth, Ferrari or any other engine in the RB. It would win races, but blow engines because of Newey's design's.


i agree, but at monza, spa etc it would only win with a merc.

seemed to have drifted off topic here, sorry
...so in conclusion williams should get a merc lol
vipul_singh
In these days of equalized engines, one can't expect to be as excited about any engine deal as in the old days.
pgj
QUOTE (Nathan @ Oct 6 2009, 23:47) *
Is there a way I arrange this persons post to not appear on my screen?

Apparantly so it designing a winning chassis. smoking.gif

I like nostalgia, I like this.



Wow!
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2012 Invision Power Services, Inc.