QUOTE (JarnoA @ Oct 7 2009, 00:01)

Because obviously, Monaco for example, is such an engine track, isn't it?
i don't see your point here
QUOTE (JarnoA @ Oct 7 2009, 00:01)

If the Renault block was so bad, it wouldn't have won 4 races.
i said weak, not bad, slight difference there
look at the starting grid for monza (which is THE engine track)
1 Lewis Hamilton McLaren-Mercedes
2 Adrian Sutil Force India-Mercedes
3 Kimi Räikkönen Ferrari
4 Heikki Kovalainen McLaren-Mercedes
5 Rubens Barrichello Brawn-Mercedes
6 Jenson Button Brawn-Mercedes
7 Vitantonio Liuzzi Force India-Mercedes
8 Fernando Alonso Renault
9 Sebastian Vettel RBR-Renault
10 Mark Webber RBR-Renault
see a pattern there? (fred had kers btw)
that is every single merc car on the grid in the top 7, and with the current engine freeze regs, that is a joke (i don't care whos fault it is, merc's, fia's, dodgy regulations, but it's and effing joke)
QUOTE (JarnoA @ Oct 7 2009, 00:01)

The fact is that Newey makes cars that destroy engines. How many engine failures have Alonso, PK, or RG had?
Red Bull have a fast car at the expense of reliability. Just like the McLaren of 2005.
Im talking pure performance here, not reliablity.
but your right, its obvious the tight packaging on the rb5 has compromised cooling somewhat, which has had a major effect on the championship.
but performance wise, the renault has fallen well short this year. (and could possibly be contributing to the cooling problems - look at the massive cooling holes at the rear of the renault, are they compromising aero too much because the engine is too hot?)
QUOTE (JarnoA @ Oct 7 2009, 00:01)

You could put a Merc, Renault, Toyota, Cosworth, Ferrari or any other engine in the RB. It would win races, but blow engines because of Newey's design's.
i agree, but at monza, spa etc it would only win with a merc.
seemed to have drifted off topic here, sorry
...so in conclusion williams should get a merc lol