Mac your more intelligent than this, the same happens anywhere in the world and the above, strictly as written, simply doesn't apply to China. You are speaking to a man who's Wife is a top lawyer here with here own law firm with 20 lawyers in our city and a Senior Partner in a major cities law firm so don't you think I know a little about what goes on law wise? Don't you think a normal evening conversation between us is about what case she is doing?
Doesn't that fact that there is law firms here tell you something on it's own? If you were at the mercy of the "State" why would there be lawyers?
Doesn't that fact that there is law firms here tell you something on it's own? If you were at the mercy of the "State" why would there be lawyers?
I can't speak to China and I wasn't. I was speaking to a very common defense of authoritarian governments in general, which I immediately recognized. The idea that one has personal rights as long as one manages to obey the state is logically flawed.
I don't know about China specifically as I've never lived there. But whether there are law firms there is here nor there, really. There were lawyers in the old Soviet Union. Where you have bureaucracy and statecraft you have lawyers. That doesn't mean individuals have guaranteed personal freedoms. Two different things. There were lawyers centuries before the concept of natural rights was ever proposed.
I appreciate your wish to stand up for your adopted homeland. But clearly, the country has a ways to go in terms of personal rights. Now, things are improving in your country every day, we understand. That implies recent room for improvement, doesn't it?
