QUOTE (Risil @ Nov 9 2009, 18:40)

Not until there's any interest from equipment manufacturers, it isn't.

Strange thing is, IRL in the last couple of years has had an extremely strong driver line-up, especially if you include a few of the guys of partial schedules.
[tangent]
Indycar needs to wean itself off Honda subsidies, and compete on its own terms. The Daytona Beach-controlled International Speedway Corporation also need to be avoided where possible, and a rear-engined USAC division needs to be created to open up the pipeline of American grassroots talent. Combined with Jeremy Shaw's
Team USA scholarship programme, hopefully the extreme paucity of US drivers in top-level open-wheel motorsport can change. This new Izod sponsorship actually gives me some hope that money will be available to put into these self-sufficiency programmes.
[/tangent]
Let's see; that would mean no races at:
Chicagoland (ouch, best race of the year)
Homestead
Kansas
Watkins Glen (that hurts too...)
As long as ISC are involved we'd have to avoid Phoenix, Fontana, Michigan and Richmond (pretty much their fault there's no OW racing left there). That could leave IndyCar with just five oval races (one abroad), and that would be disastrous and look Champ Car all over again. In that sense, it's pretty dumb thrashing its relations to New Hampshire when the relationship to the ISC is already that fragile. Someone within the commercial department of IRL must have had a hole in his head or something.
If the ISC was excluded, oval meetings could still be held at Indy, Milwaukee (yes, damn it is gone for next year), Texas, Iowa, Las Vegas, New Hampshire, Nashville, Kentucky, Motegi as well as maybe even Atlanta Motor Speedway. Unfortunately, the management of the commercial duties have been incompetent and ruined the IRL of most of its ovals. As a fan of oval racing, that makes me quite sombre thinking about it