The AUTOSPORT Bulletin Board > Would Schumacher been better than Fisi

Full Version: Would Schumacher been better than Fisi

The AUTOSPORT Bulletin Board > Forums > Racing Comments

Pages: 1, 2, 3

Odvan

Oct 23 2009, 13:36

QUOTE (qvn @ Oct 23 2009, 17:10)

So what?

SD said F60 is difficult to drive. It is where MS will excel. The more difficult the car is the better MS will be. That is the reason why I say MS would be much better than Fisi and Badoer in F60 and may be beat Kimi at 2nd race.

So that nobody knows how MS would drive F60. That's all. And pass the pipe.

BTW when MS drives last time such car and succeed?

qvn

Oct 23 2009, 13:55

QUOTE (Odvan @ Oct 23 2009, 09:36)

So that nobody knows how MS would drive F60. That's all. And pass the pipe.

BTW when MS drives last time such car and succeed?

Ferrari 1996! It is described by Irvine as "a dog of a car".

George Costanza

Oct 23 2009, 13:57

QUOTE (Odvan @ Oct 23 2009, 09:36)

So that nobody knows how MS would drive F60. That's all. And pass the pipe.

BTW when MS drives last time such car and succeed?

The 1996 Ferrari F310...

Odvan

Oct 23 2009, 14:01

QUOTE (qvn @ Oct 23 2009, 17:55)

Ferrari 1996! It is described by Irvine as "a dog of a car".

So nothing changed during those 13 years. Please.

qvn

Oct 23 2009, 14:05

QUOTE (Odvan @ Oct 23 2009, 10:01)

So nothing changed during those 13 years. Please.

No, a great driver will not lose his still over time. MS still did one of his best race in Brazil 2006 where he did around 14 overtakings in one race and coming from nearly being lapped to 4th.

Odvan

Oct 23 2009, 14:12

QUOTE (qvn @ Oct 23 2009, 18:05)

No, a great driver will not lose his still over time. MS still did one of his best race in Brazil 2006 where he did around 14 overtakings in one race and coming from nearly being lapped to 4th.

So F246 (or how it was named) was bad car or what? Dunno where is connection between driving a good car and bad.

qvn

Oct 23 2009, 14:23

QUOTE (Odvan @ Oct 23 2009, 10:12)

So F246 (or how it was named) was bad car or what? Dunno where is connection between driving a good car and bad.

QVN: "No, a great driver will not lose his skill over time"

This skill includes handling the bad car as well as good car. Do you understand?
This is my last post on this thread.

Odvan

Oct 23 2009, 14:27

QUOTE (qvn @ Oct 23 2009, 18:23)

QVN: "No, a great driver will not lose his skill over time"

BS. Everybody die in the end.

So what's happened with great skill in 2006? Why he retired?

Odvan

Oct 23 2009, 14:29

QUOTE (qvn @ Oct 23 2009, 18:23)

This skill includes handling the bad car as well as good car. Do you understand?

How exactly this skill includes both handling? Where is connection? Button won WDC but is he good in a dog car?

QUOTE

This is my last post on this thread.

Birelman

Oct 23 2009, 14:35

QUOTE (Odvan @ Oct 23 2009, 14:12)

So F246 (or how it was named) was bad car or what? Dunno where is connection between driving a good car and bad.

lol I don't get this qvn guy!

so, since "according to Eddie Irvine" (who of course we can believe every word he says, and never said anything for his own amusement

said the 1996 Ferrari was a dog, then Michael drove the race of his life in a dog in 2006 in Brazil while Massa put that same dog of a car miles beyond anyone else that day?

OHHH, I get it now!!!!

qvn

Oct 23 2009, 14:44

QUOTE (Birelman @ Oct 23 2009, 10:35)

lol I don't get this qvn guy!

so, since "according to Eddie Irvine" (who of course we can believe every word he says, and never said anything for his own amusement

said the 1996 Ferrari was a dog, then Michael drove the race of his life in a dog in 2006 in Brazil while Massa put that same dog of a car miles beyond anyone else that day?

OHHH, I get it now!!!!

Oh dear! Where did I said 2006 is a dog? I used that race just to prove that "No, a great driver will not lose his skill over time".

Get it? If you don't what can I do?

Odvan

Oct 23 2009, 15:15

QUOTE (qvn @ Oct 23 2009, 18:44)

Oh dear! Where did I said 2006 is a dog? I used that race just to prove that "No, a great driver will not lose his skill over time".

Get it? If you don't what can I do?

Ferrari was superior car in that day so nothing extraordinary, even rookie Massa was ahead Alonso on 18s.

Birelman

Oct 23 2009, 15:35

QUOTE (qvn @ Oct 23 2009, 15:44)

Oh dear! Where did I said 2006 is a dog? I used that race just to prove that "No, a great driver will not lose his skill over time".

Get it? If you don't what can I do?

Well it was an odd way of saying it I guess lol

Anyway, drivers do loose reflexes and physical strength with age, and your body aiches just a bit more each day, which, of course, would lead to loss of concentration in a GP, just like everybody else, we just get older each day, there is not exception, Schumacher is human, just like the rest of us. We could easily argue that a younger Schumacher might have won the 2006 championship, who knows? It's only a natural process of life.

There is an old saying "The older I get, the faster I was"

This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.