Originally posted by marcus123
Well it would be free if I didn't have to buy a TV licence by law.
My point is though, why are the BBC paying so much for it.
Considering the BBC haven't announced what they paid for it or indeed any other sport, how do you know that the BBC
are paying so much for it?
The point is clear that ITV, for whatever reason, needed rid of F1 and fast. Probably down to Michael Grade.
Bernie therefore needed someone to take it on, and that's why he approached the BBC. Don't forget the BBC's statement in which they clearly state Bernie approached
them to take it on.
After all, on UK terrestrial who else is going to take it on?
I can't see Channel4 taking it, they're too interested in constantly broadcasting shows about Al Quieda and people born with 9 arms and 2 heads to show anything that isn't considered subversive and dangerous (even though things that try and provoke shock on purpose are neither of the above - tip to Channel4: shock by mistake is more effective than contrived shock).
The only other people are Channel5 - and don't make me laugh about those guys. They only ever used to show bargain bucket USA sports like basketball and CART that no other channel wanted, and they lost them years and year ago. Channel5 barely even exists.
No way would Bernie even bother putting in a cursory telephone call to either of the above.
So that leaves the BBC.
For all we know we licence-fee payers may be getting an amazing deal on the F1. Somebody had to take it, perhaps for the first time in his life Bernie was the person being screwed and the BBC got it for relatively nothing.
And it depends what channel they show it on. It won't be one of their cable channels, that's for sure, but nobody knows yet if it'll be on BBC1 or BBC2. If it's going to BBC2 they'll have paid even less money for it as that's not their main station.