Rosberg - 34.5pts
Nakajima - 0pts

Both drivers did a full season, Nakkers was beaten by Kobayashi who competed in 2 races and got 3pts!

Quite bad TBH, reminds me of 1999 and Ralf Schumacher v Alex Zanardi.

If Lewis would have won, and Kovi finished where he did finish, the point difference between LH and HK would have been 37 points.

1994. MS 92 points, JJ+JV 11 points. That's a massive 81 point difference and must be the biggest.

Even worse considering MS only raced 14 times.

In all those other examples the team mate actually scored!

I don't remember Zanardi scoring in 1999.

Ralf Schumacher 35 points, Zanardi 0 points.

Sorry, mate but I thought your opening post was a question, not a statement. But you did misformulate you opening statement and if we go by your logic then you do lose by 0.5 points

Well I did mean this season.

For this reason - Naka no drive 2010

!963 Clark 54pts (73 scored) Trevor Taylor 1 over a 10 race season. But the points score does not do true credit to TT talents.

Dave Walker once scored no points whilst Fittapaldi won the Drivers Title in the Lotus in 1972.

Exactly, he was another one who could hear the apex coming.

Well I'm pretty sure has a kid, so he must've scored at some point..

Add to that the 6 he lost stupidly in Australia, and the 6 from Monza... he would have spanked heikki by almost 50.

Alonso vs Fisi 2005. Difference of 75 points!

133:58

The year before Fisichella doubled Felipe Massa's points as team mates.

Both Rosberg and Alonso scored all the points for their teams.

Points difference in order:

Rosberg/Nakajima - 34.5 - 100%
Hamilton/Kovalainen - 27 - 69%
Räikkönen/Massa* - 26 - 69%
Alonso/Piquet* - 26 - 100%
Button/Barrichello - 18 - 55%
Vettel/Webber - 14.5 - 55%
Trulli/Glock* - 8.5 - 58%
Buemi/Bourdais* - 4 - 75%
Fisichella*/Sutil - 3 - 62%
Heidfeld/ Kubica - 2 - 53%

* incomplete season.
% - that leading driver scored for the team.

Buddy, your calculator is broken

A number divided by zero is not 100%, in the Real universe.

1972. Fittipaldi 61, Walker 0.

I'd imagine 1993 Senna over Michael Andretti by a 73-7 margin's got to rank way up there?

There's no division going on there - Rosberg scored 100% of the team's points. It's the percentage of the team's points that the leading driver scored. Hence, it must be between 50 and 100% just as it is. Perhaps your reading glasses are broken

Buddy, points difference analysis means one minus the other and the percentage, the difference divided by the total.

He is subtracting first and then dividing

looks right to me.
rosberg scored all of the points, there for; leading driver for williams scored 100% of points.

kubica/heidfield as close as ever.
nick is so underated.

ie Button/Barrichello % diff is 21% ish of the top of my head.

How about Kimi vs Fisi 2009 at Ferrari?

And next year we have a chance to see Alonso vs Massa...

Schumacher scored 144-67 against Barrichello in 2002, that is arguably the second largest margin ever.

2005 BAR-Honda - Jenson Button 37pts/Takuma Sato 1pt

Why are you arguing - it's perfectly clear the % is a % of the team's total points, end of story!

But what does it all mean. Some still adhere to the Rosberg is crap, Naka is supercrap premise. Definitely Kazook is a Toyota pay driver, Rosberg may be future GP winner.....

Suuuuuure, but the fact is that Lewis didn´t won. Sorry.

1994 should not be a reference. Hidden traction control made the work. Thanks Tad.

1985 McLaren: Prost 73 (76 scored), Lauda 14. 59 (62) point difference, not bad when a win was only worth 9.