QUOTE (Chezrome @ Nov 5 2009, 19:43)

That Ekstrom won the ROC proves was that he was the best in general with the cars that were used at the ROC. Nothing more, nothing less. In 1973 Mark Donohue won three of the four races of the International Race of Champions (IROC), where all drivers used the same Porsche 911's. Wiki says: 'The drivers invited were from a broad range of racing disciplines: NASCAR, Indy cars, sports car racing, and on rare occasions, WoO, and drag racing. Criteria for invitation was very loose, but typically consisted of recent season champions of the respective series, and individual winners of big events (Indy, Daytona, etc.).'
Does that mean he was the best of all those drivers? I don't think so, however I admire the man. He was just the best at that day, in that car, in those specific circumstances.
One thing is certain, if I was repeatedly beaten by someone in different vehicles and on different tracks, I would definitly consider that person being a better driver. Never admit it loud of course, but I would know. What RoC have is different cars, but it is a Micky Mouse track with no speed. The speed is of course the biggest difference between driving perfect in a buggy and perfect in a F1 car. But apart from that, I think RoC is currently the best measure of overall driving talent. Mark Donohue and the others all had the same car, on top of that a Porsche which is a car you simply have to get used to. Now they use cars from completely different categories and Mattias beat Schumi in the open wheeler.
I must say that I am impressed that Schumi and Button takes part, specially Button since he... well, he will never win. Schumi is fast enough, but he is a legend that
must win. Luckily, he does not see it that way and it honors him. Kimi, Alonso and Lewis does not seem to have that courage.