QUOTE (sephiroth @ Feb 12 2010, 01:16)

I am amazed that anyone who has seen any of my postings in the last 2 weeks would think I would bash Schumacher. Unbelievable. Criticizing MGP is something that we all should be doing. The standard excuse (2009 aero parts) shouldn't still be acceptable since Jerez test is meaningful and important. I am sure that Schumacher will be consistently (atleast) 0.5 seconds faster than Rosberg but its not important if he is 1 second slower than alonso.
Rosberg was quickest yesterday in what little dry time there was,so clearly the Mercedes isn't a pathetic dog of a car. Again,even the Ferrari was unable to beat his time from yesterday despite the lengthy amount of dry running everybody got today. Third,Schumacher finished the day ahead of Alonso,and his quickest lap was four-tenths quicker than that of the Ferrari. Both of them did short sprints as well as long distance runs,so there was absolutely no reason to suggest Alonso wasn't in a position to beat Rosberg's time. Fourth, Alonso's longest run was 47 laps long,while MS' long run was interrupted by a clash wit h Kobayashi's Sauber. Michael actually was running around in the 1:25's with damage on his car. Some feat,that.
Result: the Ferrari and it's 2010 aero-package is in no position to challenge the W01 minus it's final diffuser and damaged side pods.
See how silly drawing conclusions from testing can be?
QUOTE (Augurk @ Feb 12 2010, 01:19)

Someone tells his concerns over possible MGP pace, whilst saying several times he wants Schuey to win, and is seen as a Schumacher basher. Apparently I'm not the only one who's been working overtime every day.
Thing is,different people have different ways of looking at the same situation,some inevitably more pessimistic than others. This does not,however,mean you can expect NOT to get criticized for trashing a team/driver. This is an online forum,people don't know each other personally so nobody's going to take it for granted that a poster is an avowed fan,nor would anyone give a damn. There's a fine line between being objective and overdoing the criticism,especially more so if it isn't justified.