QUOTE (OnyxF1 @ Nov 19 2009, 12:31)

This thread has reminded me of why I hate driver worshippers. Let's do a little calculation shall we? Let's see how many potentially WDC winning cars Raikkonen, Hamilton and Alonso have had and compare it to Button. Maybe then we will realise why Button had a "mediocre career".
Hamilton: Had a WDC capable car in 2007, 2008. That's 2 out of 3 years he's been in F1.
Alonso: Had a WDC capable car in 2005, 2006 and 2007. That's 3 out of 8 years he's been in F1.
Raikkonen: Had a WDC capable car in 2003, 2005, 2007, 2008. That's 4 out of 9 years he's been in F1.
Button: Had a WDC capable car in 2009. That's 1 out of 10 years he's been in F1.
And to all those who say that Button had a poor second half to the season, what about Hamilton's messy and inconsistent season last year? Not to mention that he managed very little this year before McLaren sorted out the MP4-24. Alonso? Was nowhere this year in a crap car or at the beginning of last year before Renault made the R29 come good and even then one of Alonso's wins was due to cheating. Also remember that Alonso won 6 races in the first half of 2006 but only 1 in the second. Raikkonen? Crapped out a potential WDC in 2008 and lost to... Massa, who MS destroyed in 2006.
It's very much about the car and not so much to do with the drivers (although they are a minor factor as we see due to teammate battles). Button did what he had to do this year. He won the WDC with a car that was capable of it and beat his teammate. You can't ask a driver to do any more than that. Any speculation that Hamilton, Alonso or Raikkonen would have won 14 races in this year's Brawn is just that: speculation. How do a bunch of frustrated internet fanboys know that the Brawn's handling would have suited any of those drivers?
in 2003 mclaren was alot slower than ferrari. Kimi only won 1 or 2 races and then made alot of podiums. He was consistent but not a real contender against schumi's ferrari.
in 2005 the car wasnt a contender because its not only speed! Reliability also counts and the car was broken all the time. he made 7 wins and other 5 podiums and still finished second because of DNF and penalties due to broken engines. He couldnt have done better himself in those 2 years.
So is not that linear as you put it, and imo kimi only had 2 real chances, the 2 years with ferrari.
yes i am a kimi fan but nevertheless i think i have a point.