QUOTE (Tifosi90 @ Nov 20 2009, 18:49)

You just don't seem to get it. Here I will write it as simply as possible.
2005 - Alonso beats Kimi to the WDC. Kimi was already considered one of the best in F1 at that time and many were only waiting when he will win his first WDC. Alonso also smashed Fisi his team mate by 75 points.
2006 - Alonso beats Michael to the WDC. Michael is easily one of the best drivers ever in F1. Alonso again smashes Fisi by 62 points.
2007 - Kimi beats Alonso & Hamilton & Massa. Kimi beats a two times champion and also beats Hamilton who many considered a world champion in waiting. Kimi also beat Massa by 16 points.
2008 - Hamilton beats Massa & Kimi to the WDC. Hamilton beats a world champion and Massa to the tittle.
2009 - Button beats Rubens & Vettel to the WDC. Rubens is considered by many to be an average number 2 driver which he was his whole career. Vettel is considered by many to be very good but he had a bad season with driver mistakes and car unreability. Button beat Rubens by 18 points.
See where this is going? All the current WDC's had a much harder time racing against much better drivers than Rubens or Vettel. Alonso beat Kimi and Michael, Kimi beat Alonso, Hamilton, Massa and Hamilton beat Massa & Kimi to the tittle.
There's a big difference between Rubens, Vettel and the rest of drivers I have mentioned. What I am trying to say Button had an easy competition compared to what Alonso, Kimi and Hamilton had when they won their WDC's.
There's a big difference beating an average number 2 driver like Rubens or beating a 7 time world champion don't you think?
Oh please, So you're going to say that Hill's championship in 1996 was undeserved because his only competition was JAcques Villeneuve and Jean Alesi and Michael Schumacher was in a bad car? YOu gonna say that Piquet was also an unworthy champ in 1981 because he had to face none other than Carlos Reutemann while Alan Jones was busy crashing or breaking his car? OR Rosberg because he had none other than JOhn Watson as a rival and Pironi was in the hospital while Alain Prost was stuck with a grenade exploding Renault? Or Jody Sheckter was less worthy because Alan Jones had an unreliable car and had Gilles Villeneuve as his bitch, and the points standings played in his favor? Is Fittipaldi also unworthy because he had none other than Clay Regazzoni as his rival and a then young crashprone Niki Lauda?
That's all utter bullshit. You fight against the competition you have that year, you beat them, you're a worthy WDC, no matter if it's Michael Schumacher or Jacques Villeneuve. It's not Button's fault that the competition stumbled over each other or had reliability issues. He who's more consistent and wins enough races to be ahead of the rest at the end of the season is a worthy WDC.
Oh, Since when was Barrichello ever been a slouch? He's a very good driver when he has the car behind him. True, he's a moaner to the nth degree, but a BAD driver? That's news to me.