QUOTE (Kenaltgr @ Oct 31 2009, 15:20)

Why was he 15th and 16th in the races at the start of the year with his natural ability, Oh forgot, he didn't have the best car back then.
Frank Williams said recently that if you have a car that is 1/4 of a second to half a second off the best car, then if you have the best driver in the world, he will make a difference. But if you have a car more than 1 second off the pace, having the best driver in the world will make no difference.
By all accounts, McLaren was somewhere in the neighborhood of 1.75-2.5 seconds off the pace in Melbourne. So according to Frank Williams, who I think we can all agree has the experience upon which to base knowledge of what he's talking about when it comes to drivers, no one could have done anything with that car.
I'm not saying Hamilton is necessarily the best driver in the world. (He may be, but that's not my point.) The point is that sometimes the car is so bad, you can't do anything with it. Vettel didn't exactly shine in the Toro Rosso the first few races of 2008 before he got the 2008-spec chassis from Red Bull Technology.
And he didn't qualify 15-16th in every race at the start. Melborne, yes. Sepang, he made Q2. Shanghai and Bahrain, he made Q3 with a massaged- but still crap- car. Even with a crap car, he still had good race pace and managed to finish in the points in the first four races of the year.