Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Pre-season pecking order
The AUTOSPORT Bulletin Board > Forums > Racing Comments
Pages: 1, 2
Nustang70
QUOTE (6string @ Mar 3 2010, 14:28) *
Take a look at last year's thread:

http://forums.autosport.com/index.php?showtopic=107061

Apart from Brawn, people's perception of the pecking order was pretty far off. Virtually no-one put RBR in their top 5, and most massively over-estimated BMW and Ferrari. I have a feeling we're once again going to shocked in some way come Bahrain 2010.



Neat. Thanks wave.gif

noikeee
QUOTE (undersquare @ Mar 3 2010, 17:31) *
Once Merc have applied their major update I don't see a basis for separating the top 4 teams, in terms of their cars' basic pace. Maybe an order will emerge but atm I think it's going to come down to who does the best at the weekend - setups, use of data, and driving. Good Friday, good Qualy, and good raceday.

Fiddling around with corrections until your home boy comes out top isn't much use IMO, except for page hits.

I think people putting Mac and Merc behind haven't adjusted for what we saw on the last day of testing and for Merc's Bahrain update.

Maybe the guys with their 09 RE's will have a slight advantage? Massa, and (I assume) Webbo & Seb.


The big question is whether the update will bring the predicted 4 tenths or not... I've been here for a few pre-seasons now, and there's always a team or two that claims "don't worry, we'll bring updates". Usually that ignores the fact the other teams are also constantly bringing updates! If they don't for Bahrain, they'll do it for the following race and Merc will have nothing to show there. There's also usually some false rumours around about updates. It wasn't long ago that Ferrari was supposed to be working on a super-mega-diffuser to bring at the later stages of testing, I've yet to see it...

Renault are also claiming they have a big update coming. In their case, I am hoping that it will work, because if it doesn't this is going to be a painful season as a Kubica supporter!
HanD
QUOTE (paranoik0 @ Mar 3 2010, 08:45) *
I don't think it's a coincidence that so many teams set these very similar laptimes on short runs on the final days. Those must've been qualy sims. Of course that doesn't mean everyone was running on 100% empty tanks, but assuming they were doing so is the only way to come up with an analysis of the times. Do you have a better suggestion?


interesting considering JA said that looking at sector times, nico could have done a 120.2 and that he was setting fast sector times on different laps, possibly on purpose. also, RB said that Schumi hasn't done a proper low fuel qualy lap yet...how does that factor in?

personally i think merc is highly underrated.

my opinion:

Ferrari, RBR, Merc
Macca


Williams, FI
Sauber, Renault

The rest.
Campeador
Red Bull
McLaren
Ferrari
Mercedes

Williams
Sauber

Renault
STR
Force India

Lotus
Virgin
noikeee
QUOTE (HanD @ Mar 3 2010, 18:40) *
interesting considering JA said that looking at sector times, nico could have done a 120.2 and that he was setting fast sector times on different laps, possibly on purpose. also, RB said that Schumi hasn't done a proper low fuel qualy lap yet...how does that factor in?


That's true, but their long run pace looked shit compared to McLaren. Some guy on the testing thread did the maths and Schumacher lost over 40 seconds through his race sim to Hamilton's. Then again those race sims were weird, for example Red Bull's sim was terrible and even worse than Toro Rosso's.

Maybe Red Bull and Merc were hiding their pace somehow on their race sims, either through running different aero configurations on purpose, running lower engine revs, filling the fuel tank to the absolute maximum instead of the only necessary for completing the race, etc. We don't know. What we do know is that Ferrari has been impressive in the first weeks of testing, McLaren now impressive at the end, and the laptimes back them up, so it's pretty safe to say Ferrari and Mac are somewhere up front. As for Red Bull and Merc, there's signs they might be up there, and there's signs that they might not, Merc in particular seemed to throw some negative vibes to the press, so I'll rank them a little behind as for now.
Biggles Flies Undone
Once McLaren added their moveable front wing this happened.

(ZooL's graph)


Merc are adding their main updates at the race so.....

It could well be Hamilton or even Schumacher at the front after the first stint.
pike
I feel a big surprise coming.
pup
Here's my take...

QUOTE
Ferrari

I'll start off with some controversy. Ferrari is a third-place team. I know, everyone says they're the team to beat, but I see through all their big-talk and fancy lap times and I know their weakness - and it's a doozy. The Ferrari eats tires like the cookie monster eats oreos. Sure, they can do a 40-lap stint, but only on hard tires with their lap times slowly inching up, whereas the other teams are able to lower their lap times as the fuel burns off. And on the soft compounds, I'm surprised that there isn't a visible cloud of rubber trailing behind them.

I know I'm completely out on a limb on that - it's dead opposite of what I've read pretty much anywhere. But I can't help but go back to the final race sims in Barcelona...



You can see what I mean about the Ferrari. They can manage to just keep their lap times even as the tires go and the fuel burns off, but then they get new rubber and fly. The Mac and Merc, on the other hand, seem much easier on the rubber. The first stint is the most important in this regard, given the fuel loads and everyone fighting for position. Massa just killed this particular set of tires, while Schumacher, Button and Alonso managed to at least get theirs to hold. Hamilton's first stint is scary. His entire race sim is scary - I mean you can't even tell where he pits.

The other thing is that while Ferrari might look fast now, they've got no new parts planned until Barcelona; and unlike the other leading teams, they've already got their car pretty much tuned in. So on both counts, there's less room for improvement over the first races.

So yeah, they look quick, but they're not quick enough, because...

McLaren

WDC, WCC. I think they're in a perfect position with the car this year. It was quick out of the box - fastest lap times in all but one of the tests, fastest trap times in all of the tests; it responds well to updates; they've thoroughly mapped out the aero in real life conditions; they've got an update planned for the first race; and they've been more than a bit coy in testing. And as quick as they are, both drivers still say that they're only just now getting into doing setup work.

Not to mention all the complicated gadgetry and cheatery that I'm sure they've yet to completely understand, much less unleash.

This car has legs.

Mercedes

I think they had a bit of a slow start this year. They didn't have the car ready for the launch, had difficulty understanding some problems, and weren't able to get any real updates out during testing. Nonetheless, the car is still quick, and I don't expect Brawn to let his team languish. They'll have a big update in Bahrain, and I think that will set the tone for the season. If it's good, then they'll be the ones to take the fight to McLaren throughout the year. If not, well then they won't. As close as they are, I'm expecting their update to pull them ahead of Ferrari in Bahrain, but not ahead of McLaren, only because they'll have updates of their own.

Red Bull

You never know with them. Last year, everyone had them pegged as solidly mid-pack, but then they came out fighting and almost won the championship. I think they're a bit quicker than they let on; though I expect the extra speed is along the lines of what McLaren and Merc will show. So - I think they'll be fighting Ferrari for third, but who knows.

Force India

If last year wasn't enough of a demonstration, this year will prove to everyone that the key to making the independent teams competitive is through partnerships and customer cars. FI's tie-up with McLaren is deep enough for me to consider them a customer team, and I think it shows. They'll do well this year; every bit as well as...

Sauber

BMW is gone, but Peter got the house in the divorce. And the kids. And...

The only problem is that he didn't get any of the sponsors. I think they'll start well, but the money pinch will show itself soon enough. Expect them to surprise at first, but fade as the year goes by.

Williams

Cosworth's great hope. Solid team; solid midpack performances. They'll fight it out with STR, Renault, and Sauber.

STR

If you liked last year's Red Bull, you'll like this year's STR, only with worse drivers.

Renault

Good driver, but I just don't hold out much hope for the team. Too many personel changes, too steep a drop in budget.

Lotus

Virgin is faster right now, but Lotus is more likely to last.

Virgin

This team is an underrated threat to finish races, I think.

Campos

Late to the race. Later to the finish. If they show up.

Stephan

Maybe it's just me, but I don't think that 40' shipping container looks all that aerodynamic.

USF1

Yeah, right.

FenderJaguar
Very interesting analysis. Can't wait until the first race!
craftverk
good post pup, however I believe Williams is higher than you think, and Lotus seem quicker than Virgin, Virgin couldn't go below 1:26

Red Bull are very, very quick... I'd even say that they are the team with the most raw speed right now

HRT could be the slowest on the grid
four1
QUOTE (pup @ Mar 3 2010, 15:31) *
Here's my take...

Ferrari

I'll start off with some controversy. Ferrari is a third-place team. I know, everyone says they're the team to beat, but I see through all their big-talk and fancy lap times

Just out of curiosity, what "big talk" has Ferrari done? I don't recall them ever saying that they had an advantage over any other team during the tests. In fact, if anything, they said that nobody could draw conclusions from the pre-season tests due to fuel loads.

In fact, I have never heard any team talk "big" based on pre-season tests.
pup
That was something I call a "joke". You can read up on it here.
BiH
here goes. btw last year i predicted round 1
ferrari, brawn, bmw, toyota, rbr.....

for 2010 season round 1.

i put mercedes in third due to significant upgrade coming. the surprise team will be either sauber or force india.
williams will struggle due to cosworth engine.


1: Red Bull
2. Ferrari
3. Mercedes
4. McLaren
5. Force India
6. Sauber
7. STR
8. Williams
9. Renault
10. Lotus
11. Virgin
12. Campos
magicon
That chart is quite illuminating. I think Mclaren are tops too.
race addicted
Everybody agrees it´s very close. And everybody agress about those four teams having an edge on the ones immediately behind.

I´m thinking Hamilton on pole, and Alonso to win Bahrain. The Red Bulls will be top five in both qualifying and the race.
Francesc
I hope to be way wrong:

Qualy pace:
Red Bull - McLaren
Mercedes
Ferrari
Williams
Force India
Sauber
Renault
STR
Virgin
Lotus
Hispania?

Race pace
Ferrari- McLaren
Red Bull
Mercedes
Sauber
Renault
Force India
Williams
STR
Lotus
Virgin
Hispania?

Owen
QUOTE (pike @ Mar 3 2010, 19:28) *
I feel a big surprise coming.

The only one I can see is Sauber, at least according to Autosport. The car is being super kind to its tyres apparently.
FSA
QUOTE (race addicted @ Mar 5 2010, 13:31) *
Everybody agrees it´s very close. And everybody agress about those four teams having an edge on the ones immediately behind.

I´m thinking Hamilton on pole, and Alonso to win Bahrain. The Red Bulls will be top five in both qualifying and the race.



I think the Red Bulls are better than top five. I think it's more likely to be Vettel on pole and then Alonso for the race win in Bahrain. Regardless of the exact order of the starting grid, if Alonso qualifies in the top three he wins the race on superior tyre performance. That's the closest prediction I can make at this point.
pgj
QUOTE (FSA @ Mar 5 2010, 21:23) *
I think the Red Bulls are better than top five. I think it's more likely to be Vettel on pole and then Alonso for the race win in Bahrain. Regardless of the exact order of the starting grid, if Alonso qualifies in the top three he wins the race on superior tyre performance. That's the closest prediction I can make at this point.


Good post.

I fail to see how anyone can map what has happened in testing this year onto race pace. In most years anyone at or near the top of the timesheets has generally been in with a shout. This year top speed is not enough. It will come down to the car that preserves its tyres best in the first one or two stints. Out and out pace will only be an advantage in the latter part of the race. If a driver in a faster car uses its pace too soon, he will not have enough rubber left to complete the stint.
undersquare
QUOTE (paranoik0 @ Mar 3 2010, 18:39) *
The big question is whether the update will bring the predicted 4 tenths or not... I've been here for a few pre-seasons now, and there's always a team or two that claims "don't worry, we'll bring updates". Usually that ignores the fact the other teams are also constantly bringing updates! If they don't for Bahrain, they'll do it for the following race and Merc will have nothing to show there. There's also usually some false rumours around about updates. It wasn't long ago that Ferrari was supposed to be working on a super-mega-diffuser to bring at the later stages of testing, I've yet to see it...

Renault are also claiming they have a big update coming. In their case, I am hoping that it will work, because if it doesn't this is going to be a painful season as a Kubica supporter!


I know what you mean, there's no way to be sure, but I think Merc will make up ground on the others. The late introduction indicates a weakness I think, I don't see it as a deliberate plan but being late, so on that basis they do have a bigger performance step due as they claim. I see them with a driver disadvantage over the season, not sure about Bahrain though.

Renault - totally agree it would be great to see them up there again. No evidence yet tho. But Kubi can at least show a good relationship and build his reputation for working well with a proper racing team (I don't see Schumi doing all his 3 years...).
femi
QUOTE (pup @ Mar 3 2010, 21:31) *
Here's my take...


I like your writing style. Fun to read - never a boring moment. up.gif
Mandzipop
I haven't got the foggiest idea.

They are all saying everyone is faster than everyone, but not their own team. confused.gif
Alonzo
QUOTE (Owen @ Mar 5 2010, 17:30) *
The only one I can see is Sauber, at least according to Autosport. The car is being super kind to its tyres apparently.

Probably you saw that on the paid content. Obviously this is private for those who correctly support autosport but I don't know if you can say if there is any interview or info autosport have regarding Sauber qualifying speed, can you?

PS: I also think RB is the best car but not in Bahrain where corners are of slow speed. Ferrari, Mclaren and Mercedes(only with Schumacher) are more likely to shine there.
toonczyk
Race positions:
Ferrari
Macca
RBR
Mercedes ~ Renault ~ Williams ~ Sauber ~ Force India (all very close)

But in qualy I guess RBR will easily take pole.
Italiano Tifoso
After the last day of testing i must say that McLaren looked most impressive both in short stint pace and long stint consistency.

Red Bull, Ferrari, and Mercedes all have pro's and cons against them but out of these 3 i think Red Bull is best placed as their car to me seemed faster than the Ferrari and Merc, however reliability will be the issue for them it seems.

Ferrari are reliable, but i am unconvinced about their long run pace, it seems they have gone the other way in regards to their tyre usage. Last year they were too easy on their tyres, this year it seems they may be a little too hard on them in order to get them working in qualy. It is this balance between qualy and race setup with respect to tyre peak performance in qualy and durability in the race which will be so hard to get just right. It seems the Ferrari is just taking way too much performance from their tyres over a long stint. Lewis was on it and his pace was great over the long run assuming a similar strategy to Ferrari. It should be noted though that Ferrari were not doing a race sim apparently on their last day with Massa.

So far it seems the McLaren may have found the balance if they did not alter the setup from their qualy run to their race sim. But this is an unknown from the last day of testing.

Overall, there doesn't seem to be one team that has everything sorted, they all have their weaknesses, but for me McLaren seems a little bit ahead fo the rest in terms of overall pace and reliability combined. On pace alone Red Bull is ahead but i think reliability will let them down a little.

But as the saying goes, it is easier to make a fast car reliable than to make a reliable car fast. Ferrari may have their work cut out for them to find that extra 2 tenths it seems to me they are missing on their long runs.
Mc_Silver
Qualy Trims

1- McLaren
2- Red Bull
3- Ferrari
4- Mercedes

Race Trims

1- McLaren
2- Ferrari
3- Red Bull
4- Mercedes

They re all very close. I think they are all between 0.3 tenths. There is no room for any mistakes.
Italiano Tifoso
QUOTE (Mc_Silver @ Mar 6 2010, 01:35) *
Qualy Trims

1- McLaren
2- Red Bull
3- Ferrari
4- Mercedes

Race Trims

1- McLaren
2- Ferrari
3- Red Bull
4- Mercedes

They re all very close. I think they are all between 0.3 tenths. There is no room for any mistakes.


I would roughly agree with this. Unless McLaren were running lighter than usual it seems they made a big step on the final day of testing.
FenderJaguar
Want to bump this after the first race. It seems Ferrari and Red Bull are the strongest and that Mercedes and McLaren are slightly behind. Then Force India maybe?
noikeee
QUOTE (FenderJaguar @ Mar 15 2010, 14:28) *
Want to bump this after the first race. It seems Ferrari and Red Bull are the strongest and that Mercedes and McLaren are slightly behind. Then Force India maybe?


From what we saw at Bahrain I think this is the current order:

Red Bull = Ferrari
McLaren
Mercedes
Renault
Force India
....
Williams
Sauber = Toro Rosso
....
....
....
....
Virgin = Lotus
....
....
....
....
HRT
Mandzipop
QUOTE (FSA @ Mar 5 2010, 21:23) *
I think the Red Bulls are better than top five. I think it's more likely to be Vettel on pole and then Alonso for the race win in Bahrain. Regardless of the exact order of the starting grid, if Alonso qualifies in the top three he wins the race on superior tyre performance. That's the closest prediction I can make at this point.


And you were absolutely spot on. eek.gif
RSNS
QUOTE (RSNS @ Feb 28 2010, 16:10) *
First tier
RedBull, McLaren, Ferrari

Second tier
Mercedes, Williams, perhaps Sauber

If I were to predict the first winner, I'd say Vettel.
The only real candidates will be Red Bull, Ferrari, McLaren, Mercedes. The other teams do not have consistent enough drivers.


Just to congratulate myself smile.gif
Alonzo
QUOTE (paranoik0 @ Mar 15 2010, 16:47) *
From what we saw at Bahrain I think this is the current order:

Red Bull = Ferrari

How can you get things wrong when there is no guessing anymore? lol.gif

RBR > Ferrari
noikeee
QUOTE (Alonzo @ Mar 17 2010, 12:29) *
How can you get things wrong when there is no guessing anymore? lol.gif

RBR > Ferrari


I'm not sure they were ahead in Bahrain. Slight advantage in qualy and in the first stint, but come the second stint the Ferraris were quicker. Maybe that was Vettel's problem but it seemed to me that Alonso and Massa were both closing in before Vettel's engine issue started doing any effect.

Also, so far, Ferrari's reliability > Red Bull's reliability, even if Ferrari have changed engines as a precaution.
race addicted
QUOTE (RSNS @ Mar 15 2010, 23:29) *
Just to congratulate myself smile.gif



Yeah, congrats man! Being humble I have to say I´ve nailed it pretty spot on earlier years, but I got Merc´wrong now. You were right though, they are not quite there.

Seems we have a very good and interesting second tier this year; Mercedes - though I totally expect them to break free and into tier 1 relatively soon - Williams, Renault, Force India, Sauber and perhaps Toro Rosso as well (some competitive laps in Bahrain).
FSA
QUOTE (Mandzipop @ Mar 15 2010, 20:59) *
And you were absolutely spot on. eek.gif


Thanks mate. Not that I was 100% sure when I made the prediction. It was just obvious to me that Red Bull were fast and that Ferrari were not too far behind, and perhaps even equal to them. It's a shame Alonso didn't win it by passing Vettel on the track. I firmly believe Ferrari had the superior race pace in the last 20 laps (when it was going to count the most) and would have had better tyres than Vettel at that point. Alonso would have been on his gearbox all the way to the flag, and could have muscled past. It's a shame it got ruined by the Red Bull problem. Let's hope we see a proper finish to the race in Australia. I hate when a driver inherits a win because the other guy broke down.
Alonzo
forget this tier thing, it's not precise. The thing is:
Red Bull>Ferrari>>Mclaren>Mercedes>Renault>Force India>>Williams>Toro Rosso about the same as Sauber.

I expect some changes in Melbourne though.

race addicted
We talk about tiers only because the pecking order is likely to change a bit between tracks.
...you´ve picked up on that yourself. Really no point in saying firmly that X is faster than Y.
aditya-now
QUOTE (Turbo4 @ Feb 28 2010, 15:04) *
Ok, the pre-season testing will be over in a few hours and I think we've all had a close enough look at the times/likely fuel loads/length of stints to form a view on who's where.

For me, its

1. Ferrari

juuust ahead (in race pace anyway) of

(equal 2nd) Red Bull & McLaren

who have a slight edge over

(equal 4th) Mercedes & Williams

then, in order

6. Sauber
7. Renault
8. Force India (not as good as they think, imo)
9. Toro Rosso (though they could be a surprise when the real show starts)
10. Lotus
11. Virgin

I think the team most likely to be foxing is Red Bull. They might be well out in front once the flag drops for first qualifying in Bahrain, at least if their car doesn't break down every hour. Why do I think this? They seem to be able to do longer stints at the same laptime as teams like Mercedes (in particular) who are doing shorter stints. Of course, this might just mean other teams are carrying the same fuel load but not burning it all up before they pit. Plus I think that Red Bull will be the only top team with a real desire to mask their true pace and thus not encourage a bunch of copycat aero bits turning up in Bahrain, something that happened A LOT in the second half of last year.

No science to my thoughts really, just hunches. lol.gif


The OP is quite spot on as well, especially: "I think the team most likely to be foxing is Red Bull. They might be well out in front once the flag drops for first qualifying in Bahrain, at least if their car doesn't break down every hour."

Congrats also to all the others, you are Nostradamuses!!!
GAZF1nut
QUOTE (Alonzo @ Mar 17 2010, 16:18) *
forget this tier thing, it's not precise. The thing is:
Red Bull>Ferrari>>Mclaren>Mercedes>Renault>Force India>>Williams>Toro Rosso about the same as Sauber.

I expect some changes in Melbourne though.


Yeah
Everything the same except Mclaren is much closer,if not equal, to Ferrari and Red Bull.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2012 Invision Power Services, Inc.