QUOTE (Seanspeed @ Mar 11 2010, 16:10)

I respect the physical fitness required to drive these cars, but from what I've seen and heard, modern F1 cars aren't really all that difficult to drive in terms of skill. An inferior driver only .2 slower than his teammate is probably largely a result of that.
Don't underestimate how difficult it is to drive something like an F1 anywhere near it's limit. Sure it looks dead easy on TV, but reality is so far from this.
It's so easy to underestimate both the speed and just how physical it is. Even if you had the natural ability and reactions to drive an f1 car quickly, trying to do it while subjected to peaks of 7G for up to 2hrs straight without losing concentation even for a moment is well beyond most people.
If you haven't done so before, get yourself into a REAL kart sometime soon (not some arrive and drive rubbish). You'll be stunned just how quick it feels and how physical it is. If you've not done it before you'll be lucky to do more than 10 laps physically and mentally (that is if you can even keep it pointing in the right direction). That's 35bhp and no aero ... now imagine scaling it up to an f1 car, under the pressure of a race with 25 other cars wheel to wheel with you. Even people who do exceptionally well in slower racing formula often still get to F1 and find themselves unable to adapt to the speed of the cars.
Older F1 cars were a different challenge, challenging in different ways (manual shifting etc) .. but ultimately even driving an f1 car within 5-10secs of the pace for more than 5 laps is beyond the capabilities of the vast majority of people.
"Only .2 slower" is a relative thing too. If you are a racing driver, consistently 2 tenths off your team mate in equal equipment, believe me that feels like a lifetime! The gaps in F1 are smaller now largely due to the increased quality of both the cars produced and the drivers who make it to f1.