Originally posted by Tony Matthews
Peter, don't get me wrong, I have been called Mr Pedantic, and I am delighted that you have shone some light on the Tyrrell business. The problem is that I was very new to going to circuits and team headquarters, on my own, charged with handling an unfamiliar camera and having to collect enough information to prepare a cutaway - at that time, also a fairly daunting prospect. The result is that I did not always take enough note of exact types, chassis numbers and other detail that I now wish I had!
The other problem is that (and I may offend a few people here, I sometimes forget that this is not a fire-side chat) there were no natural heirs at Standard House, or so it seemed, to DSJ, and whilst I saw him every so-often, and we occasionally chatted, I got the impression that he was less interested in the F1 cars that were appearing in the early seventies than before. He certainly never discussed the technical detail of the cars I was illustrating with me, which I found slightly odd.
The only time I can remember any lengthy conversation was when he maintained that a reflection that I had painted in a 'chrome' part of the slightly garish paintwork of the Lotus 87 was wrong. I explained why I thought I was right, he maintained I was wrong! I found a photograph in the LAT Photographic department taken from a similar angle and lo!, there was the reflection! But on seeing it he just grunted something about it still being 'wrong'. However, when he wrote the text to accompany the Motor Sport colour cutaways, it was back to the usual DSJ. Perhaps he was just not that interested in technical illustration, or in my work.
So, please don't feel that I am somehow belittling your determination to correct me on detail - I think it is fascinating, more, more...!
tony - i dint take you the wrong way, no need to explain - personally i cant imagine how you could produce such fine work without having the designers pedantry for detail and correctness, so it was assumed on my part that you had before i even started to type! i also share your preoccupation with getting the photography sorted - whenever i am at an historic meeting these days i am usually consumed with getting the pictures i am after to the detriment of enjoying the ambience. still, 10000 digi pics later, im not sorry about that..
interesting that you broach the subject of dsj's contemporary attitude to f1 cars.. in the early 70's he would have been a similar age to myself now, and i can understand where he might have been coming from - it certainly comes across in his writing from that pre turbo era (which seemed to fire him up again) that the cosworth generation of cars was perhaps not the era which stimulated him the most - although i think the engine itself got his attention.
anyway, for reasons almost certainly down to 'formative years', whereas i can struggle to identify one Cooper from another - but am still very interested - the 70's generation is the one that grabs my attention - and eye for detail ! as ive said here before, your early work will have had a lot to do with encouraging that.
cheers
peter