Just seen this great pic in a book I have called Motor Cycle Racing by Peter Carrick, first printed in 1969.

I´ve often wondered about how the BM was competitive with it´s boxer configeration, which must have had a limiting influence on ground clearance as well as power output, but I recently read that one of it´s biggest assets was it´s light weight. In fact the machine pictured was, at 302 lbs, the lightest bike in the 500 class by quite some margin, so that must have played a big role in it´s success.

I´ve often wondered about how the BM was competitive with it´s boxer configeration, which must have had a limiting influence on ground clearance as well as power output, but I recently read that one of it´s biggest assets was it´s light weight. In fact the machine pictured was, at 302 lbs, the lightest bike in the 500 class by quite some margin, so that must have played a big role in it´s success.
Don't think that the flat twin concept is a disadvantage in terms of power output, it might even have some advantages as cooling compared to a twin or V... but from a rider's point of view, the transverse momemtum of a flat twin is quite awkward IMHO. Geoff Duke never got accustomed to it, didn't even John Surtees give it a try ??
Anyway, the blown BMW was reported to deliver 55-60 hp in the pre era and something between 80 to 90 hp post war when competing in national races in Germany

Schorsch Meier 50 years after his Senior TT win ( and Ivan Rhodes on the Velo Roarer behind ?)





