Hi Francois,
No one denies that some of the 1/32 scale models have faults too. The 1960's to 1990's Scalextric for example, are nothing but lumpy and shapeless toddler toys to me, but this has drastically changed since manufacturing moved to China.

. The others had to adapt and the models are better than ever, especially the Slot.It models that can take on ANY 1/43 scale hand-built expensive models. HO are good and fun, no one denies that either. However please compare the net aesthetic result as shown on the posting regarding the Cobra Daytona.
As far as what is underneath, I can agree with you that the cheap plastic chassis are rather poor, but what is so different with the HO cars?
As far as FLY wheels out of round, it is a well-known fact and one that has its roots in their engineering and lack of understanding of the basic principles of compressing gases VS the cracking or deforming of cheapo plastic hubs, not in their looks. Is not it what we are talking about here, looks? :yawn:
As far as the on-track speed and behavior of HO cars VS 1/32 scale cars, I am sorry to disagree. The HO cars are over-magnetized and stupidly-fast for their size, resulting in crashes making the car fly 3 miles from the track when a shade too much throttle is applied. If the magnets are removed, the cars are uncontrollable. One notable exception to that are the old 1960's Aurora T-Jet cars (the ones that REALLY look like lumps but are "cute"), and the Riggen cars with the brass chassis, and the look of those is to say the least, pathetic (but oh so cute!).
Not the case for the modern 1/32 scale cars that in most cases can run fairly decently without their traction magnets.
After that, it is a matter of personal preference, but I would like to call things as they really are, reality VS perception. The larger the model, the more chances it will offer greater accuracy and precision. I hope that you do not mind. That still does not stop me from liking the HO cars, but let's apply reason against emotion...
Kind regards,
T54