Maurice's nose
#1
Posted 09 August 2005 - 07:28
I cannot recall EVER seeing a picture of this car before, although I don't doubt there were one or two in Autosport at the time.
The surprising thing to me, apart from the really weird body they clothed this T.51 with, is the fact that the coloured bands around the nose of the car are red, white and BLUE.
I seem to recall a photo of said driver in, IIRC, a Centro Sud Cooper Maserati at the Station in Monaco in 1960 (if I am wrong, please don't hesitate to tell me!) and this car had the same sort of coloured nose bands but red, white and GREEN. Naturally, I assumed that being an Italian entered car, the 1961 car would also include green despite being a different team. Another assumption now is that the blue was in honour of the French driver.
Incidentally, I DO NOT INTEND TO STICK THE INNES IRELAND FIGURE ON THE BACK OF THE CAR (as per the, apparently, famous Spa photograph) for many reasons, not least the fact that scaling up the driver from the 1/43rd scale, he is almost 7 feet tall (over 2 metres!)
I am not looking for any particular reasons for this, although it would be interesting to know, I just needed to tell somebody!
#3
Posted 09 August 2005 - 20:24
You see, I have always 'read' that nose band as green, but clearly it must have been blue all along, though in this picture it is somewhat indeterminate.
As soon as I finish my model, I'll put a picture on this thread.
Thanks for that picture, Rob.
Now, do you have one of M. T. in the Centro Sud car the year before? (#44)
#4
Posted 09 August 2005 - 21:36
This is the 'famous' Ireland pic from 1961 Spa...
#5
Posted 09 August 2005 - 23:31
I was wondering what Barry mean there about the "famous Spa photograph."
#6
Posted 10 August 2005 - 06:29
YES, that last photo is the model I am building. But, as I said, I am leaving off the 7 foot Innes!
I shall number the car as it was at Reims.
#7
Posted 10 August 2005 - 15:19
You'll have to explain the "seven foot" Innes ??
#8
Posted 10 August 2005 - 15:34
I was just on ebay and I saw a model with the Innes figure riding on back.
The description in the ad can not be what is pictured ?? The model in the picture looks way too simplistic and the ad speaks of "photo etched " parts ?? Sorry, I don't see any !! ..... and "cockpit details that will blow you away ??" Don't see that either !!
Very, very strange !!
#9
Posted 10 August 2005 - 19:00
#10
Posted 10 August 2005 - 19:37
#11
Posted 10 August 2005 - 19:44
I don't know about cockpit detail - there is a steering wheel and a pin to use as a gear lever, and of course, a seat for the driver; however, the suspension arms are photo-etched. 'Orrible things you have to bend ar right-angles to get them to fit and the resultant suspension NEVER seems to sit square.
So far I have sprayed the body, base and wheels and have bent the rear suspension arms. There are 2 additional pieces to glue on to create the leaf spring at the rear.
As you can see from the photo, the Innes Ireland looks very tall - 2 metres in scale size, whereas the Trintignant in the car is a dwarf! I shall use neither.
Incidentally, I bought a Mk.1 B.R.M V.16 kit off the same seller.
#12
Posted 10 August 2005 - 19:53
You´re making me to consider resuming modeling.
How did you bend the suspension arms? A trick used to work with me was heating the pieces a little bit with a 100w bulb. Works ok with no significant side effects, other than an even heating of the whole piece.
-pato
#13
Posted 10 August 2005 - 19:59
Bog simple but it works quite well.
Regarding models - I only like unusual ones. I was really disappointed yesterday when I missed a 1963 A.T.S kit. The second A.T.S I have missed in the last couple of weeks.
I have a 1962 Cooper T.60 part made and a D.50 Lancia ready to start.
#14
Posted 10 August 2005 - 20:13
Choices, choices...
#15
Posted 10 August 2005 - 23:11
#16
Posted 10 August 2005 - 23:51
http://www.alpimodel...ixo/lm1951.html
http://www.alpimodel.../bzr/bz124.html
http://www.alpimodel.com/bzr/bz36.html
#17
Posted 11 August 2005 - 04:57
Not necessarily. The 1960 F1/F2 Cooper was the T51. Only the factory had T53sOriginally posted by Roger Clark
I assume that a 1960 Cooper implies a T53 in modern parlance
I was never happy with the Black Book numbering of Scuderia Serenissima entries, but believe there might have been more than one car. Perhaps the Belgian GP car was not the Monaco one at all
#18
Posted 11 August 2005 - 05:55
True, but if DSJ referred, in 1961, to "a 1960 Cooper" I still think it's reasonable to infer that he meant a T53. On the other hand the fact that he didn't say "the Monaco car re bodied" might imply a different car.Originally posted by David McKinney
Not necessarily. The 1960 F1/F2 Cooper was the T51. Only the factory had T53s
I was never happy with the Black Book numbering of Scuderia Serenissima entries, but believe there might have been more than one car. Perhaps the Belgian GP car was not the Monaco one at all
#19
Posted 11 August 2005 - 05:59
.
.
.
.
Advertisement
#20
Posted 11 August 2005 - 07:34
Obviously, being a total know-nothing about chassis numbers etc, I can add nothing to the above posts, except that.... looking to produce a slot-racing version of this car as it is bang 'in period' for one of my series, I find that a T.53 body seems to match the overall shape of the Serenissima special nigh on perfectly.
The strange lump in front of the driver and the flat deck behind him should be quite easily reproduced.
I cannot say with any authority that the car was a 51 or a 53 (the model manufacturers call it a 51), but ain't it nice to see something different....?
#21
Posted 11 August 2005 - 08:27
I disagreeOriginally posted by Roger Clark
if DSJ referred, in 1961, to "a 1960 Cooper" I still think it's reasonable to infer that he meant a T53
I believe that "a 1960 Cooper" would imply T51, especially writing in 1961, when "a 1961 Cooper" would a T53
#22
Posted 11 August 2005 - 10:05
Were those ATS models you missed old discontinued ones, or new?
(GP Models lists a future model with a CGI image:)
http://www.grandprix...&c=&myID=0
Is there a link to them?
Paul M
#23
Posted 11 August 2005 - 14:01
turin posted the link, that can't be the car described in the ad !!
...... best of luck with what you are building.
#24
Posted 11 August 2005 - 15:07
Paul M
#25
Posted 11 August 2005 - 17:51
The only danger is that the tyres have gone hard and split when you stretch them on to the wheels, as has happened with my pre-Costin Vanwall kit.
#26
Posted 11 August 2005 - 23:16
#27
Posted 11 August 2005 - 23:33
Hey... I was 11....
#28
Posted 17 August 2005 - 15:09
#29
Posted 17 August 2005 - 18:26
#30
Posted 17 August 2005 - 20:47
Now you've got to do the 1/32 version1
#31
Posted 17 August 2005 - 20:54
#32
Posted 18 August 2005 - 14:18
Very well done, Barry !!
#33
Posted 18 August 2005 - 21:06
#34
Posted 18 August 2005 - 21:11
Mine will have to be based on a T.53 though.....
#35
Posted 24 August 2005 - 07:01
Now you've got to do the 1/32 version
...and here it is...
As I said earlier, this is based on a T.53 not a T.51. The Serenissima badge is a bit on the big side but the words are actually legible! It is a tad high on the body but this is because I did not want to have to put it across the body join and hence have to slice it in half. Decals are so delicate.
It has not run yet (no engine installed) but will make its debut at my French Grand Prix next week.
#37
Posted 29 November 2005 - 16:05