Racing car bodywork I designed went into manufacture today!
#1
Posted 18 January 2009 - 00:07
Pictures and links to pictures below and I would like to thank Andy Mitchell of Mitchell Motors in Wiltshire for allowing me to post the pictures on the forum. He will be competing later this year.
Start to finish of the project was 2/3 months.
The pictures show what the bodywork will look like and the former created to make the bodywork in virtual and real life.
Estimated time saving for Andy will be 35%. Accuracy massively improved. If car is crashed, he has the ability to recreate the bodywork exactly as it was before.
"Virtual" finished buck.
Finished buck in real life.
"Virtual" bodywork as it will look when car created in the flesh...colour to be decided.
Real buck/former - close up rear view.
http://i264.photobuc...-manipulate.jpg
"Virtual" tubular chassis.
http://i264.photobuc...ame-VS1copy.jpg
"Virtual" bodywork with tubular chassis added.
"Virtual" rear view of bodywork.
Real buck - corner close up.
Virtual corner close up....very close I reckon...as you would expect.
Real hoop former.
http://i264.photobuc.....g car/b11.jpg
Real view over front of buck.
http://i264.photobuc.....g car/b13.jpg
Advertisement
#2
Posted 18 January 2009 - 01:21
#3
Posted 18 January 2009 - 19:55
The spaceframe was created as the first step to ensure the body would not snag the car inner architecture, whilst also hugging the chassis as close as possible.
#4
Posted 18 January 2009 - 21:28
#5
Posted 19 January 2009 - 08:57
Steve
#6
Posted 19 January 2009 - 09:44
#7
Posted 19 January 2009 - 10:16
#8
Posted 19 January 2009 - 11:04
#9
Posted 19 January 2009 - 11:04
Originally posted by Stephen W
What series is it racing in & when?
It will be racing in an Aston Martin Owners Club classic series. The car will be finished in 3-4 months.
To show a bit more what can be achieved, I have added a couple of pictures below with the body made transparent showing in one case the buck underneath and the other the tubular chassis.
#10
Posted 19 January 2009 - 11:57
#11
Posted 19 January 2009 - 12:02
Excellent handiwork of which you are justifiably proud. It just makes one wonder how all those chaps managed years ago before these computer things did it all for you, especially the small operations where they sourced, produced, matched and built all the components themselves. The joy of progress, I suppose.Originally posted by Bloggsworth
Don't you just love CNC routers........................
Roger Lund
#12
Posted 19 January 2009 - 12:18
Originally posted by bradbury west
Excellent handiwork of which you are justifiably proud. It just makes one wonder how all those chaps managed years ago before these computer things did it all for you, especially the small operations where they sourced, produced, matched and built all the components themselves. The joy of progress, I suppose.
Roger Lund
Not that many years ago! I've posted this before, but it makes an interseting comparison -
http://myweb.tiscali...andora/body.htm
I had fun doing it the old fashined way, with black tape, but what i'd have given to be able to use a computer to do it!
Great looking car - what mechanicals will it be based on?
#13
Posted 19 January 2009 - 12:42
#14
Posted 19 January 2009 - 17:20
Pretty looking car.
#15
Posted 19 January 2009 - 17:28
Originally posted by bradbury west
.......It just makes one wonder how all those chaps managed years ago before these computer things did it all for you, especially the small operations where they sourced, produced, matched and built all the components themselves. The joy of progress, I suppose.
Roger Lund
TNF member Peter Ross built the body buck for the Lotus mark VIII ( also known as the P3 ) in the same 'egg box' type plywood construction for Colin Chapman in the Hornsey factory in 1954 using just hand tools at night. It then went to Williams & Pritchard for the highly complex curved bodywork to be hand rolled and welded in aluminium. Detailed in his book 'Lotus the early years '.
#16
Posted 20 January 2009 - 01:15
Originally posted by bradbury west
Excellent handiwork of which you are justifiably proud. It just makes one wonder how all those chaps managed years ago before these computer things did it all for you, especially the small operations where they sourced, produced, matched and built all the components themselves. The joy of progress, I suppose.
Roger Lund
When I was going to design school, one of the things I learned in my first term (from
Strother Macminn ) was lofting: making sections in three views of a complex organic shape. Lofting came from boat hull designs and then went into car body design.
MacMinn designed this car and had it built using the technique:
Road and Track Le Mans coupe
#17
Posted 20 January 2009 - 01:31
55 years ago, toiling over my drafting table with T-square and triangle, I never could've imagined work like yours being accomplished.
Just brilliant, my friend!
#18
Posted 22 January 2009 - 15:44
I've only done one piece of three-dimentional design, like so many things I've done, simply because I was asked to - I'm a push-over, basically - and dropped in at the deep end I had to rely on skills developed as an aero-modeller!
The late, much-missed Paul Morgan called me one afternoon, I asumed to talk about an illustration, but it was a request to change the rear-end of his Talbot single-seater, originally a large saloon, to make it more elegant. He had cut-and-shut the rear of the chassis to enable the fitting of a tapered tail, and would I have a go? "It's probably only a day's work for you, Tony!" He supplied me with a 1/8 scale chassis drawing and, er , nothing else. He wanted it to look GP Talbot-ish, so I checked some books and a part-work and set to.
I drew an outline on his side-elevation, and some sections on his chassis sections, but after a couple of days realised that I needed to see it in the round. I also wanted something I could show Paul that would have more impact than a side-view. I made a 1/8 card model, complete with foam-board and gummed brow-paper wheels and set off for Brixwoth. He was happy with what I had to show him, and after I had supplied his body shop with full-size sections and a set of sketches that showed the 'skin' over the formers, there was nothing to do but wait.
Five years, to be precise!
Hopfully, pics to follow!
#19
Posted 22 January 2009 - 15:58
Originally posted by Jones Foyer
When I was going to design school, one of the things I learned in my first term (from
Strother Macminn ) was lofting: making sections in three views of a complex organic shape. Lofting came from boat hull designs and then went into car body design.
The sail loft was the largest area of clear floor in shipbuilders yards, large enough to cut the largest sail, so the hull cross-sections were laid out on the loft floor, hence Lofting - Don't you just love the way language develops.
#28
Posted 22 January 2009 - 16:18
Do you have any pics of the actual moulding process? I still haven't the faintest idea how the bodywork is actually shaped to make it that smooth...
#29
Posted 22 January 2009 - 17:46
I think they probably use an English Wheel rather than hammer and anvil.Originally posted by anbeck
Wow, impressive!
Do you have any pics of the actual moulding process? I still haven't the faintest idea how the bodywork is actually shaped to make it that smooth...
#30
Posted 22 January 2009 - 17:53
Originally posted by D-Type
I think they probably use an English Wheel rather than hammer and anvil.
I was sure anbeck was talking about Whitney's computer imagery, not Paul Morgans car! If I'm wrong then, yes, the brilliantly simple, elegant English Wheel. I have other photographs of the aluminium body under construction but none of the wheel being used.
#31
Posted 22 January 2009 - 18:30
Originally posted by anbeck
Wow, impressive!
Do you have any pics of the actual moulding process? I still haven't the faintest idea how the bodywork is actually shaped to make it that smooth...
It's not all that different from what we used to do at Specialised Mouldings, though of course that was to make a buck to take moulds from, to end up with fibreglass bodies, not metal ones as in this case. We usually started with ply formers, all cut about half an inch undersize, and fairly roughly band-sawed for the most part. We covered these with flexible wood laths nailed to the formers, and then put a skin of fibreglass mat over that. The workmanship was only as good as it needed to be where the woodwork was concerned, it wasn't cabinet-making. Joints had to be made accurately to keep everything rigid, but it was the cured fibreglass that the real work was done on, endless applications of microballoons and P-38 polyester filler, and finally a surfacing resin. As Pete and Dave kept reminding their employees, all they were interested in was an accurate hard surface to take moulds from, any fancy craftsmanship under that was just a waste of our time and the customer's money. Congratulations to all responsible for a lovely piece of work.
#32
Posted 22 January 2009 - 18:38
the longest bit of the process was doing the tape line drawings. It's just thin black masking tape which you can lift off the paper and re-apply if you aren't happy with the lines. You can do several layers, but guarenteed that at some stage you will rip off one line in disgust, only to find that you had subsequently applied a line you were hapy with over the other end of it and that you have just removed both of them......
You learn quickly to check!
I have to say it's quite a satisfying and pleasant process to work through.
#33
Posted 22 January 2009 - 18:43
#35
Posted 22 January 2009 - 19:38
1. are the panels on the shelves as small as they look? perhaps for exclusive pedal cars? I spy E type, C type, P3/4 and DB2/4
and
2. who's admitting ownership the inflatable sheep?
I have long wanted a shot of an english wheel. It is possible to hire a smallish one for a week to try from a guy who makes a CNC machined kit which you build yourself. Can't convince my wife that it's an effective use of a weeks annual leave!
#36
Posted 22 January 2009 - 20:07
Roger Lund
#37
Posted 22 January 2009 - 21:15
I'm sorry if this is already common knowledge but sometime I feel I ought to contribute something.
#38
Posted 22 January 2009 - 22:23
Originally posted by Mistron
2 things in the above photo, both of real importance:
1. are the panels on the shelves as small as they look? perhaps for exclusive pedal cars? I spy E type, C type, P3/4 and DB2/4
and
2. who's admitting ownership the inflatable sheep?
I have long wanted a shot of an english wheel. It is possible to hire a smallish one for a week to try from a guy who makes a CNC machined kit which you build yourself. Can't convince my wife that it's an effective use of a weeks annual leave!
They were full-size, Mistron, it was a large workshop, the end wall is further away than it at first looks. As to the inflatable herbivore, I asked it if it was OK stuck up on an English Wheel, it just gave me a sheepish wink.
Convincing women that anything that interests us is worth while is an up-hill struggle, their attitude, if they would only understand it, is counter-productive, and leads to secrecy and furtivness. Ooh, sorry darling, didn't see you there....
#39
Posted 22 January 2009 - 22:32
Originally posted by Paul Rochdale
It was explained to me that British sports racing car bodies were traditionally built using the English Wheeling machine whereas Italian sports racing car bodies were beaten out with mallets on sand bags. He mentioned than once the paint was removed, the amount of filler the Italians used was amazing whereas amost none was use on the wheeled bodyshells.
It is occaisionaly surprising to see a stripped Italian classic, the word golf ball springs to mind, whereas a freshly wheeled body, well - you just want to polish it!
Advertisement
#40
Posted 22 January 2009 - 23:54
He remarked that the first time he pinched a finger in it was a painfully enlightening experience!
#41
Posted 23 January 2009 - 09:24
#42
Posted 23 January 2009 - 12:55
Originally posted by Lotus23
He remarked that the first time he pinched a finger in it was a painfully enlightening experience!
I actually flinched when I read that!
#43
Posted 23 January 2009 - 13:40
"As to the inflatable herbivore, I asked it if it was OK stuck up on an English Wheel, it just gave me a sheepish wink".
..........And you accused me of being a punster!?!
Cheers
Pat
PS, I love the pen work!
#44
Posted 23 January 2009 - 15:18
#46
Posted 23 January 2009 - 20:12
#47
Posted 23 January 2009 - 20:27
#48
Posted 23 January 2009 - 21:29
Some pictures of the car as she stands tonight. Front wings coming together well.
Forgot to say. Designed buck so that it splits in half saving workshop space.
#49
Posted 29 January 2009 - 19:00
2 inch box section ladder frame with smaller section square tubes making a frame for the panels, rather like superleggera type. First effort was with a Minor 1000 cockpit area cut to open top to use as bulkheads, later scrapped. It use Rover V8 and box, Sierra diff and rear hubs, and mk Cortina front stub axles IIRC. The standard of build was of a very high quality, just for fun. This is the front end. He even taught himself trimming.Originally posted by David Birchall
What chassis is it on Roger?
He did another one a la 1930s sports car FNash/HRG type for an octogenarian retired motor trader and specialist engineer, who used to be a pal of Maurice Charles.- Le Mans D and E types etc.
For the curent one he liked the style of the Mercedes 500/540K type of body
Roger Lund
#50
Posted 03 April 2009 - 19:32