illegal exhaust Brawn GP?
#1
Posted 05 April 2009 - 15:35
Advertisement
#2
Posted 05 April 2009 - 15:36
#3
Posted 05 April 2009 - 15:46
#4
Posted 05 April 2009 - 15:47
#5
Posted 05 April 2009 - 15:48
Originally posted by Mika Mika
Grooved tyres in the photo???
It was a test, according to the article...
#6
Posted 05 April 2009 - 15:48
And yes, 2cm of alu tube is standing in the way of prince Alonso!
#7
Posted 05 April 2009 - 15:53
Originally posted by peroa
Carlos Miquel and the art of photoshop?
And yes 2cm of alu tube is standing in the way of prince Alonso!
As soon as I saw it was Marca I thought the same. It's likely to be a cut'n'paste from any old car plus an assortment of kitchen utensils.
#8
Posted 05 April 2009 - 15:54
Originally posted by bond
It was a test, according to the article...
Then that's BS, they had 7 days testing with the new car none of which with grooves.
#9
Posted 05 April 2009 - 15:54
Sounds painful.
#10
Posted 05 April 2009 - 15:57
I think its safe to say that if us forum trolls have got a picture of it, the likes of Williams, Ferrari and BMW will also have extensive info about what this is, and have they protested it or even mentioned it?
#11
Posted 05 April 2009 - 15:58
Originally posted by Mika Mika
Then that's BS, they had 7 days testing with the new car none of which with grooves.
According to them it was on the 28th of march...
They were doing refuelling simulations so they fitted with those tyres...
True or not, i don't know, so here's the link...
http://www.marca.com...1238912472.html
#12
Posted 05 April 2009 - 16:03
This is the version raced in Oz;
For AS subscribers (where AS=Autosport rather than another sensationalist Spanish rag), Here is another pic showing the Malay version.
#13
Posted 05 April 2009 - 16:03
Amazing,they know better how to check a car than the scrutineers !
#14
Posted 05 April 2009 - 16:23
Originally posted by big x
The Marca editorial this morning was hilarious."Marca calls for the FIA to investigate" ......
Amazing,they know better how to check a car than the scrutineers !
Marca - EPIC FAIL
#15
Posted 05 April 2009 - 16:31
Actually this is the oil cooling side which has a larger opening.Originally posted by Buttoneer
OMG!!!!!!!!!111111ONEONE Banninate thems!!!!!!
This is the version raced in Oz;
For AS subscribers (where AS=Autosport rather than another sensationalist Spanish rag), Here is another pic showing the Malay version.
The other side is closed with the exhaust sticking out a bit, but I believe it is within the allowed margins.
http://premium.f1-li...0/diapo_118.jpg
#16
Posted 05 April 2009 - 21:38
Originally posted by peroa
Carlos Miquel and the art of photoshop?
And yes, 2cm of alu tube is standing in the way of prince Alonso!
Carlos Miquel now works for Marca?
#17
Posted 05 April 2009 - 22:19
#18
Posted 07 April 2009 - 05:54
1.4 Bodywork :
All entirely sprung parts of the car in contact with the external air stream, except cameras, camera
housings and the parts definitely associated with the mechanical functioning of the engine, transmission
and running gear. Airboxes, radiators and engine exhausts are considered to be part of the bodywork.
#19
Posted 07 April 2009 - 05:58
Advertisement
#20
Posted 07 April 2009 - 06:41
#21
Posted 07 April 2009 - 07:02
#22
Posted 07 April 2009 - 07:06
#23
Posted 07 April 2009 - 07:08
#24
Posted 07 April 2009 - 07:11
#25
Posted 07 April 2009 - 08:03
Originally posted by kaivo
1.4 Bodywork :
All entirely sprung parts of the car in contact with the external air stream, except cameras, camera
housings and the parts definitely associated with the mechanical functioning of the engine, transmission
and running gear. Airboxes, radiators and engine exhausts are considered to be part of the bodywork.
Don't know where those photos were taken but weren't their Virgin logos on the sides of the cars for both races?
Andy
#26
Posted 07 April 2009 - 08:11
Originally posted by Andy Davies
Don't know where those photos were taken but weren't their Virgin logos on the sides of the cars for both races?
Andy
I think only from the Saturday at Melbourne.
#27
Posted 07 April 2009 - 08:17
Originally posted by Andy Davies
Don't know where those photos were taken but weren't their Virgin logos on the sides of the cars for both races?
Andy
I don't think it matters a jot where and when those photos were taken. The BGP001 passed scrutiny at both races. They were deemed legal and complied with rules and regs. The story is just a rag trying to create a sensation, nothing more.
#28
Posted 07 April 2009 - 09:00
Just a bit of rabble rousing to excuse the poor pace of a certain Asturian.Originally posted by ForeverF1
I don't think it matters a jot where and when those photos were taken. The BGP001 passed scrutiny at both races. They were deemed legal and complied with rules and regs. The story is just a rag trying to create a sensation, nothing more.
#30
Posted 07 April 2009 - 12:58
#31
Posted 07 April 2009 - 12:58
#32
Posted 07 April 2009 - 18:52
#33
Posted 07 April 2009 - 18:55
Originally posted by barteks
Quali in Melbourne:
#34
Posted 07 April 2009 - 18:56
Originally posted by barteks
Quali in Melbourne:
That´s definitely not legal according to the rules
#35
Posted 07 April 2009 - 18:58
#36
Posted 07 April 2009 - 18:59
#37
Posted 07 April 2009 - 19:19
#39
Posted 07 April 2009 - 19:40
Hes a comparison picture of the ferrari before it was changed.
http://www.autosport...1757_F2009_26-2
As you can see there is a huge difference between the Brawn and Ferrari.
Its just the paper trying anything to discredit a team doing well.
Advertisement
#40
Posted 07 April 2009 - 20:11
They're fast- honestly fast, get over it, accept it, folks.
#41
Posted 07 April 2009 - 20:38
Originally posted by barteks
Quali in Melbourne:
The brawn is even faster than we all thought if they Qualified in AUS with those tires... DAMN!!!
#42
Posted 07 April 2009 - 20:47
#43
Posted 07 April 2009 - 21:37
Sorry for the lame post but someone had to say it.
#44
Posted 08 April 2009 - 15:22
[IMG]http://inlinethumb21...S500x500Q85.jpg[/IMG]
#45
Posted 08 April 2009 - 15:23