Your choice for Massa's replacement?
#1
Posted 26 July 2009 - 20:12
#3
Posted 26 July 2009 - 20:14
#4
Posted 26 July 2009 - 20:14
Edit* - so I voted Gene
Edited by MichaelPM, 26 July 2009 - 20:15.
#5
Posted 26 July 2009 - 20:17
#6
Posted 26 July 2009 - 20:19
#7
Posted 26 July 2009 - 20:19
#8
Posted 26 July 2009 - 20:20
#9
Posted 26 July 2009 - 20:21
#10
Posted 26 July 2009 - 20:25
- He deserves his chance after giving Ferrari so much loyal service and being overlooked in 1999.
- Not MS. What has he got to gain? He's won everything there is and if he came in and bombed then it would be a complete embarassement. In light of recent incidents why would he take the risk? Especially in a car that is not really a contender for wins.
- Ferrari are not in a title battle so can afford to be a little sentimental towards Badoer. If they were in a fight there is an argument for MS or an active race fit driver.
- Not Alonso as surely the penalty will be overturned for Valencia.
- Ferrari are a 'family' and are unlikely to bring a 'name' in for the sake of it and firmly believe it will be kept within Ferrari. Besides Gene and Badoer know the cars, the factory and have no doubt been in the simulation countless of times.
......assuming of course Massa isn't fit to race. Although it's a while ago, Burti had a concussion, not as bad as Massa's in 2001 and missed the rest of the season from Spa on.
#11
Posted 26 July 2009 - 20:26
#12
Posted 26 July 2009 - 20:28
There's simply no point putting someone in who they know isn't quick, they need wdc points and Badoer/Gene won't be able to get them.
#13
Posted 26 July 2009 - 20:30
#14
Posted 26 July 2009 - 20:32
his f1 record aint exactly set the world alight tho in all fairness
it's all down to his cars
everybody said the same ##it on de la rosa, and the spaniard given the chance got his first ever podium driving a very decent car...so give gene this ferrari and will prove you wrong
#15
Posted 26 July 2009 - 20:38
But I've already said Bourdais because he's the latest "no-grider", he knows the characteristics of the Ferrari engine and he raced as late as two weeks ago. He might not beat Kimi, or maybe he's diamond in the rough. But it's the sensible and logical choice. Afterall, the show must go on and points count towards the WCC the same.
Sad question to answer.
Edited by VicR, 26 July 2009 - 20:39.
#16
Posted 26 July 2009 - 20:42
Bourdais would be the safest bet.
btw isnt Bourdais manager Nicolas Todt?
anyway agree with VicR, sad to answer, very sad.
#17
Posted 26 July 2009 - 20:48
Felipe Massa
+1 Leave the seat empty till Felipe gets back.
#18
Posted 26 July 2009 - 21:06
It's a question I hate to have to consider really, I'm still shocked at what happened to be totally honest. The sport has had it quite easy over recent years, and in a way, to us fans, it seemed fairly invincible to serious incidents like this. It was very unexpected is what I'm trying to say I guess.
#19
Posted 26 July 2009 - 21:08
1) 2009 regulations would be right up his street, I fully believe he would be challenging for race wins in the 2009 Ferrari
2) The commercial value for F1 and the PR and press the name Villeneuve on the side of a Ferrari again would generate would be immesurable
If he proves not to be up to the job he will have done no worse than Badoer and Gene but would have given Ferrari and F1 incredible levels of media attention and PR and ignited the passions of the tifosi
Advertisement
#20
Posted 26 July 2009 - 21:12
#21
Posted 26 July 2009 - 21:17
Bourdais lacks talent.
You don't become a four time CART champion without talent. Clearly he just didn't gel with the car.
#22
Posted 26 July 2009 - 21:20
You don't become a four time CART champion without talent. Clearly he just didn't gel with the car.
Major exaggeration mate
With the exception of Paul Tracy the rest of the CART drivers he was up against would not even do well in a GP2 race, we had front runners in CART in the Bourdais era like Dan Clarke who had won bugger all outside of Formula Ford for instance, beating a load of bunny's is not a massive achievement for Bourdais
#23
Posted 26 July 2009 - 21:28
You don't become a four time CART champion without talent. Clearly he just didn't gel with the car.
It seems odd I know, but CART was a poor standard. All the F1 rejects who've gone there have been at the top, all the CART stars bar JV and Monty have floppped in F1. We have to judge Bourdais on what he did in F1 and it was poor. Too poor to be in a Ferrari, for sure. The car control isn't there.
#24
Posted 26 July 2009 - 21:58
but is it there for gene or badoer?The car control isn't there.
#25
Posted 26 July 2009 - 22:00
#26
Posted 26 July 2009 - 22:03
But since that's not a real option I go for Bourdais. I would love to see him get a second chance to show that he's a good driver.
#27
Posted 26 July 2009 - 22:04
Edited by jesee, 26 July 2009 - 22:04.
#28
Posted 26 July 2009 - 22:09
#29
Posted 26 July 2009 - 22:13
Villeneuve? No chance
Fisichella? No chance
Bruni? No chance
Piquet? Are you for real, or just a joker?!
#30
Posted 26 July 2009 - 22:14
#31
Posted 26 July 2009 - 22:16
Actually can we get Zsolt Baumgartner back?
I really think Esteban Tuero is the way to go.
#32
Posted 26 July 2009 - 22:18
but is it there for gene or badoer?
No I don't think so. Given FA and MS can't then Ant is the only candidate I think. At least he might be fast enough. Especially with a kers car.
#33
Posted 26 July 2009 - 22:30
Pedro De La Rosa!
But since that's not a real option I go for Bourdais. I would love to see him get a second chance to show that he's a good driver.
One who tested Ferraris stolen data along with Alonso
#34
Posted 26 July 2009 - 22:53
#35
Posted 26 July 2009 - 22:58
Major exaggeration mate
With the exception of Paul Tracy the rest of the CART drivers he was up against would not even do well in a GP2 race, we had front runners in CART in the Bourdais era like Dan Clarke who had won bugger all outside of Formula Ford for instance, beating a load of bunny's is not a massive achievement for Bourdais
Justin Wilson won GP2 in its previous incarnation, and also raced in F1 and wasn't out of his depth there.
#36
Posted 26 July 2009 - 22:58
I really think Esteban Tuero is the way to go.
Riccardo Rosset FTW
#37
Posted 26 July 2009 - 23:07
#38
Posted 26 July 2009 - 23:11
I think it will either be Gene or Alonso
#39
Posted 26 July 2009 - 23:13
#41
Posted 26 July 2009 - 23:18
#42
Posted 26 July 2009 - 23:48
With Renault suspended for Valencia, they really should bring in Alonso as a preview to next year.
#43
Posted 26 July 2009 - 23:57
Edited by halifaxf1fan, 26 July 2009 - 23:58.
#44
Posted 27 July 2009 - 00:16
Are contracts worth nothing and Briatore so stupid he'd let Alonso go in the middle of the season? I can imagine him explaining it to Carlos and the board...
Edited by Atreiu, 27 July 2009 - 00:16.
#45
Posted 27 July 2009 - 00:17
#46
Posted 27 July 2009 - 01:28
The Tifosi would go crazy.
JV is a good friend of Massa and wouldn't be a threat to take his job.
JV being a romantic has always wanted to drive for Ferrari but Michael blocked it. (He didnt want anyone that wouldn't lick his boots)
It would be a real nice gesture in respct of GV and Jacques would do a fantastic job.
#47
Posted 27 July 2009 - 01:30
#48
Posted 27 July 2009 - 01:31
#49
Posted 27 July 2009 - 01:32
The guy did nothing in F1, got booted out of STR with his tail between his legs and now you can consider him for the best seat in F1?
#50
Posted 27 July 2009 - 01:34
Schumacher shouldn't be on the list as he would never drive when he has to race a teammate for the first time in his career.
nice troll attempt